Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claiming American Express Over 6 years Penalty Charges


Dot1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3416 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I had two accounts with Amex opened in 2003, One was Amex blue and the otherone was Gold Charge Card. I ran into financial problem and the accounts were terminated and sold to Capquest. I was first offered the Gold Card then followed by the Blue Card.

Well, there is no outstanding debts on them now but there were penalty charges on both cards which I would like to claim back. I wrote to them requesting them to repay but they refused.

I then sent a LBA and their response is basically the same.

 

Below is their reply to my LBA: (Two letters for the two accounts but the contents are the same)

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS

 

Dear Mr...

 

Thank you for your letter dated --.12.2014 concerning the default charges applied to the above account.

 

While we are disappointed that you rae not satisfied with our response, we confirm that your claim has been reviewed in accordance with time frame limited by law and that, as confirmed in our final response letter dated -- December 2014, no refunds of default charges are due in respect of this claim.

 

If, however, despite our final response, you decide to pursue legal action, American Express will have no alternative but to defend such proceedings and recover its costs of doing so from you. We trust this will not prove necessary and that we can avoid unnecessary use of the court's time and legal expense.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

Now, my question is, Has anyone had experience with Amex?

Any success story to read?

 

It is my intention to follow it through.

 

I want to issue a claim but would want to hear your opinions before I do that.

 

Thanks

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing I would also appreciate your views on is, If I decide to issue the claim, will I have to do them separately or can I combine them into one claim?

 

Any idea of the difference between a charge card and a credit card?

 

Are they both covered by CCA or not?

 

Thanks

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found out that charge card does not charge interest, if am to claim refund on the charges, do I request interest? If so what rate should I ask for? I did not have this information so I requested it at the same rate as the credit card.

 

Any suggestion?

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

dot

what is the value of your potential claim, roughly.

 

Hi Ford,

 

Thanks for taking time to look at my thread. Charges applied on each card is about £140.00.

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, would be small claims.

yes, if claiming charges then wld be with interest. any interest wld be at least statutory interest, so you wld have to claim that at least in your particulars. but, if was re contractual, then would be claiming that back. whichever, wld need to be pleaded in your particulars.

am not sure re this, would it be out of time? need further input. bump re that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, would be small claims.

yes, if claiming charges then wld be with interest. any interest wld be at least statutory interest, so you wld have to claim that at least in your particulars. but, if was re contractual, then would be claiming that back re the net loss. whichever, wld need to be pleaded in your particulars.

am not sure re this, would it be out of time? need further input. bump re that.

 

Thanks for that Ford.

 

I want to make sure that I get everything right before I make any move. A good start hopefully will make a good ending. I hope.

Hopefully, some one will come along to help too.

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the Amex reply, that is exactly what they are saying. But according to some members, they were successful in charges over 6 years. The difference might be that theirs, the account is still running or terminated recently. Hopefully, someone will shed lights on it.

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

you've already done the lba, so its do or dont.

re the charges, are you referring to those 12£ or more ones?

 

All the charges are more than £12 as the account was before the fee was adjusted. They were all in the region of £20.

 

I really want to follow it through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the Amex reply, that is exactly what they are saying. But according to some members, they were successful in charges over 6 years. The difference might be that theirs, the account is still running or terminated recently. Hopefully, someone will shed lights on it.

 

Dot

 

poss 12 years? depending on the circs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the charges are more than £12 as the account was before the fee was adjusted. They were all in the region of £20.

 

I really want to follow it through.

 

 

ok, maybe a good shout for a claim then? you can see what i was getting at :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss 12 years? depending on the circs.

 

Well, what happened is that I requested this money be paid but Amex refused yet the account was already sold to Capquest.

Instead they claimed that the money will be paid to Capquest. I protested but without success. This happened in 2010.

From what I now know, they are not allowed to do that especially when the debt is sold to a third party already which was the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, maybe a good shout for a claim then? you can see what i was getting at :)

 

Yes Ford,

 

I see what you mean. I know many years went by and that is why I need help and advise before I decide to make any claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dot

 

Maybe I can add to the information which Ford has already given.

 

The problem you might face is that we are talking approx 4 years ago that this claim money was sent to the DCA. You were probably unaware at the time that there was no right of set off and it should not have happened.

 

My view would be that you could challenge this if it cropped up but I think you ought to ask yourself the question "what would I have done with the money had it come to me"? would you have paid the debt (if it was legit) and if so there is no difference as to whether Amex paid it direct or whether you paid out out of the proceeds of your claim.

 

It opens up all kinds of questions really, one of which is would CQ have had (or could they still get) the relevant paperwork to enforce in court had the debt not been at least partially paid?

 

As you know we are not into debt avoidance but you would need to sit down and look at what may have happened if the money had been paid to you rather than passed on.

 

As has been said, charge cards do not generally charge interest although many of them contain a term that say that interest can be charged if the account is not settled in full at the due date and I am sure that the contract is for payment in full at a certain time. Failure to pay all of the balance is technically a breach of contract.

 

Having said that, we are not talking about charges being unfair under the Consumer Credit Act but more under unfair terms where a charge must not exceed the pre-estimate of loss suffered by the business as a result of your breach. If they do exceed that figure then it is is deemed an unenforceable penalty and is reclaimable as such.

 

Forget the idea that there was any rule, regulation or other authoritative regulation which said that £12 was ok.....it was only the OFT (as it was then) who said they would not investigate charges of £12 and under.

 

Interest in restitution is all about relieving the business of the unlawful/unjust profit they would have made on the money they had from you. It is not directly related to the rate of interest they were charging you.

 

They could well have charged you zero percent on the charges they levied but that charge could have allowed them to lend to some other person and make profit on that amount which, had the charge not been levied on you, they could not have done.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...