Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claiming American Express Over 6 years Penalty Charges


Dot1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3416 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I had two accounts with Amex opened in 2003, One was Amex blue and the otherone was Gold Charge Card. I ran into financial problem and the accounts were terminated and sold to Capquest. I was first offered the Gold Card then followed by the Blue Card.

Well, there is no outstanding debts on them now but there were penalty charges on both cards which I would like to claim back. I wrote to them requesting them to repay but they refused.

I then sent a LBA and their response is basically the same.

 

Below is their reply to my LBA: (Two letters for the two accounts but the contents are the same)

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS

 

Dear Mr...

 

Thank you for your letter dated --.12.2014 concerning the default charges applied to the above account.

 

While we are disappointed that you rae not satisfied with our response, we confirm that your claim has been reviewed in accordance with time frame limited by law and that, as confirmed in our final response letter dated -- December 2014, no refunds of default charges are due in respect of this claim.

 

If, however, despite our final response, you decide to pursue legal action, American Express will have no alternative but to defend such proceedings and recover its costs of doing so from you. We trust this will not prove necessary and that we can avoid unnecessary use of the court's time and legal expense.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

Now, my question is, Has anyone had experience with Amex?

Any success story to read?

 

It is my intention to follow it through.

 

I want to issue a claim but would want to hear your opinions before I do that.

 

Thanks

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing I would also appreciate your views on is, If I decide to issue the claim, will I have to do them separately or can I combine them into one claim?

 

Any idea of the difference between a charge card and a credit card?

 

Are they both covered by CCA or not?

 

Thanks

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found out that charge card does not charge interest, if am to claim refund on the charges, do I request interest? If so what rate should I ask for? I did not have this information so I requested it at the same rate as the credit card.

 

Any suggestion?

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

dot

what is the value of your potential claim, roughly.

 

Hi Ford,

 

Thanks for taking time to look at my thread. Charges applied on each card is about £140.00.

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, would be small claims.

yes, if claiming charges then wld be with interest. any interest wld be at least statutory interest, so you wld have to claim that at least in your particulars. but, if was re contractual, then would be claiming that back. whichever, wld need to be pleaded in your particulars.

am not sure re this, would it be out of time? need further input. bump re that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, would be small claims.

yes, if claiming charges then wld be with interest. any interest wld be at least statutory interest, so you wld have to claim that at least in your particulars. but, if was re contractual, then would be claiming that back re the net loss. whichever, wld need to be pleaded in your particulars.

am not sure re this, would it be out of time? need further input. bump re that.

 

Thanks for that Ford.

 

I want to make sure that I get everything right before I make any move. A good start hopefully will make a good ending. I hope.

Hopefully, some one will come along to help too.

 

Thanks

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the Amex reply, that is exactly what they are saying. But according to some members, they were successful in charges over 6 years. The difference might be that theirs, the account is still running or terminated recently. Hopefully, someone will shed lights on it.

 

Dot

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

you've already done the lba, so its do or dont.

re the charges, are you referring to those 12£ or more ones?

 

All the charges are more than £12 as the account was before the fee was adjusted. They were all in the region of £20.

 

I really want to follow it through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the Amex reply, that is exactly what they are saying. But according to some members, they were successful in charges over 6 years. The difference might be that theirs, the account is still running or terminated recently. Hopefully, someone will shed lights on it.

 

Dot

 

poss 12 years? depending on the circs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the charges are more than £12 as the account was before the fee was adjusted. They were all in the region of £20.

 

I really want to follow it through.

 

 

ok, maybe a good shout for a claim then? you can see what i was getting at :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss 12 years? depending on the circs.

 

Well, what happened is that I requested this money be paid but Amex refused yet the account was already sold to Capquest.

Instead they claimed that the money will be paid to Capquest. I protested but without success. This happened in 2010.

From what I now know, they are not allowed to do that especially when the debt is sold to a third party already which was the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, maybe a good shout for a claim then? you can see what i was getting at :)

 

Yes Ford,

 

I see what you mean. I know many years went by and that is why I need help and advise before I decide to make any claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dot

 

Maybe I can add to the information which Ford has already given.

 

The problem you might face is that we are talking approx 4 years ago that this claim money was sent to the DCA. You were probably unaware at the time that there was no right of set off and it should not have happened.

 

My view would be that you could challenge this if it cropped up but I think you ought to ask yourself the question "what would I have done with the money had it come to me"? would you have paid the debt (if it was legit) and if so there is no difference as to whether Amex paid it direct or whether you paid out out of the proceeds of your claim.

 

It opens up all kinds of questions really, one of which is would CQ have had (or could they still get) the relevant paperwork to enforce in court had the debt not been at least partially paid?

 

As you know we are not into debt avoidance but you would need to sit down and look at what may have happened if the money had been paid to you rather than passed on.

 

As has been said, charge cards do not generally charge interest although many of them contain a term that say that interest can be charged if the account is not settled in full at the due date and I am sure that the contract is for payment in full at a certain time. Failure to pay all of the balance is technically a breach of contract.

 

Having said that, we are not talking about charges being unfair under the Consumer Credit Act but more under unfair terms where a charge must not exceed the pre-estimate of loss suffered by the business as a result of your breach. If they do exceed that figure then it is is deemed an unenforceable penalty and is reclaimable as such.

 

Forget the idea that there was any rule, regulation or other authoritative regulation which said that £12 was ok.....it was only the OFT (as it was then) who said they would not investigate charges of £12 and under.

 

Interest in restitution is all about relieving the business of the unlawful/unjust profit they would have made on the money they had from you. It is not directly related to the rate of interest they were charging you.

 

They could well have charged you zero percent on the charges they levied but that charge could have allowed them to lend to some other person and make profit on that amount which, had the charge not been levied on you, they could not have done.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...