Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest Default


jimmybwa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a default of £2,976 with Natwest.

 

£1,176 of which is made from fee's from when I went over my overdraft limit

and then couldn't afford to pay enough money back to the bank to be able to get myself back under the limit.

 

I accrued the overdraft while at Uni.

This was a student account to start of with.

 

The first time I went over the limit was in May 2011.

My owed balance went up from £1767 to over £3000 in the space of 8 months.

 

Even though I complained to the bank that this was spiralling out of control and I didn't know what to do.

They just said you need to pay it back now to get under your overdraft limit.

 

I couldn't afford this, I was only just breaking even at the end of every month anyway.

 

I am now finally in a place financially where I can actually start paying something back.

 

However, I am unsure as to how to go about this.

I have already had debt collectors (Robinson Way) trying to contact me.

This was about 2 years ago.

 

Can anyone advise me on what to do?

What about the fee's of approx. 140 a month will I need to pay all this back?

 

This has been troubling me for a long time and I want it sorted as I really want to try getting my credit record in order

to enable me to get a mortgage.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this on your credit file then and defaulted?

 

and are these PENALTY charges etc since nov 2009?

 

if so you could try BCOBS complaint

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this is showing up on my credit file now,

 

Equifax, Experian and Noddle all show it.

 

The charges are penalty charges.

 

In 2009 Natwest changed how they charge for going over their overdraft limit.

 

it was I think 35 pounds for going over which was charged once in the month.

 

They then set it to be charged per day and that worked out at £5 a day.

 

when I got my statement at the end of the month I was over,

plus they were going to charge me approx. £125 in penalties.

 

This then happened each month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they do this in nov 2009 and afterwards too?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

brill

 

click the bcobs

 

and read the blue RBS link.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have a default of £2,976 with Natwest. I actually posted about this sometime ago, but have never managed to get it sorted out.

I really would like to, as its getting me down and holding me and my family back.

 

£1,176 of the total is made from fee's from when I went over my overdraft limit

and then couldn't afford to pay enough money back to the bank to be able to get myself back under the limit.

 

I accrued the overdraft while at Uni.

This was a student account to start off with.

The first D on my Noddle Credit Report is on June 2012.

My owed balance went up from £1800 overdraft to over £3000 in the space of 8 months.

Its now sat at £2976 and has been at this value since October 2014.

 

Even though at the time I complained to Natwest, that this was spiralling out of control and I didn't know what to do.

They just said you need to pay it back now to get under your overdraft limit. And offered no help.

I couldn't afford this, I was only just breaking even at the end of every month anyway.

 

I am now finally in a place financially where I can actually start paying something back.

And hopefully I would like to get a mortgage.

I am in the position where I could pay the money back in full.

But I'd really rather not pay the extra £1200 of charges.

Robinson Way contacted me about this initially and I think Westcot as well, however I did not acknowledge any letters.

 

I went to speak to a bank about the possibility of a mortgage the other day and I mentioned the default.

They say I would need to satisfy the default before I would be considered.

 

I really do not want to risk a CCJ.

The bank(Skipton Building Society) suggest I should complain to Natwest and hopefully they might let me pay back the £1800 without the charges.

 

 

Could anyone please help with what to do?

I only have 9 months until the 6 years of the default is up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

robbers way and wescot dont buy debts. Theyre just rent a muppet hoping to [problem] you into paying.

 

Just wait for the 9 months imo, as paid or not, if that default is on your file, it wont make any difference to the status of the debt. The default will still be there, paid or not.

 

The debt will become legally unenforceable if you havent paid in 6 years and havent given written acknowledgement the debt is yours.

 

The default will be removed 6 years from date of entry. If you pay it, imo its wasted money as that default will still be there, and the majority of mortgage companies will still refuse you

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged..please keep to one thread per issue.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

not paying them anything are you?

ie you've not use the account since?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good so statute barred then..

they cant get a CCJ..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb is 6yrs yes.

 

 

whats your problem

its dead..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be statute barred by Sept 2018.....officially ( The first D on my Noddle Credit Report is on June 2012. ) Thats allowing 3 months for service of the recall notice.

 

But what date did you last actually use the account...deposited money or paid a Direct Debit ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb is 6yrs yes.

 

 

whats your problem

its dead..

 

OK, thank you.

 

It will be statute barred by Sept 2018.....officially ( The first D on my Noddle Credit Report is on June 2012. ) Thats allowing 3 months for service of the recall notice.

 

But what date did you last actually use the account...deposited money or paid a Direct Debit ?

 

Andy

 

The date of the default is the 31/05/12. I think I stopped using the account before October 2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the default was placed 8/9 months later..of course if it went to court they would argue the cause of action runs from xx April ? 2012 (the date on the Recall Notice) and the default was entered 31/05/12...so April/May 2018 would be the creditors version of statute barred.

 

So unless a court claim is issued from now till then it really is not a problem.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...