Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breaking News re Roxburghe


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Administrators arrived yesterday. All staff were made redundant without pay and sent home. Am couple of people kept on to help sell business but basically fu clef everybody over. I have known some of these people for 15 years and they have treated people like dirt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Dont tske this the wrong way... Im sorry to see you out of work and all but...

Another one bites the dust.

 

I hope you and your colleagues find something else quickly...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Rubin and partners. I am only posting this cos I am so upset at how we were all treated

 

You should be due statutory redundancy.

 

https://www.gov.uk/redundant-your-rights/redundancy-pay

 

This will have come as a shock. But you need to make sure you register ASAP for any entitlements you may have. e.g JSA, council tax benefit. You may be waiting quite awhile, before you know the position. Benefits can take awhile to come through, with forms to be completed.

 

I don't know what your finances are like, but if you have any mortgage redundancy cover, you should notify the Insurers of a possible claim.

 

Also check your bank statements and see what you have outgoing. You may have to cancel or reduce your ongoings.

 

Get onto the local Job Centre to see what they have available and start applying. Your colleagues will be doing the same, so you need to see if you can get there first.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How odd that Roxburghe’s director Gary Osner’s LinkedIn profile already has his job title changed to Managing Director, ZZPS Ltd. A company set up ages ago...

 

I should imagine that this has been on the cards for quite awhile. I think this company lost their credit licence earlier this year, which would have concerned current clients.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Rubin is also the administrator for HFO (UK) Holdings Ltd, which went into VOLUNTARY liquidation – in other words, the company chose its own liquidator. I would put money on the same thing happening here. After over two years, the HFO (UK) Holdings situation has still not been sorted out, and as it owns HFO Services (which has lots of assets), it will be interesting to see where all this goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your advice. I am seeing my solicitor later on today to go through my options as I think they have acted illegally so I will update my posts on here

 

What they have done is unfortunately standard practice. I have known this to happen to a few friends, who have turned up for work as normal with 10 years + service and they have had the annoucement followed by security escorting them out of the building.

 

You will get a letter from the administrators shortly which will contain all the relevant information about your rights etc.

 

You have been made redundant with immediate effect and there is a standard process that is followed.

 

ACAS are worth phoning, as they will have information about this situation. They will know more than your Solicitors, unless you have an employment law specialist.

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1410

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other companies to look out for in the HFO Capital/Roxburghe/Concilian world are:

 

– Cograd Ltd (formerly Roxburghe parking Services Ltd) opened by Gary Osner of Rox, but director now Badri Nathan & ultimately owned by Concilian

– ZZPS Ltd, owned wholly by Gary Osner

 

– Peckwater Capital Ltd (started in Ireland recently by Alasdair Turnbull and another director of HFO Capital Ltd (Ireland)

– Prime Arbor Finance Ltd and Prime Arbor Ltd, founded recently by Badri Nathan (and Turnbull is associated), but no info on ultimate owner

 

A dormant (now closed) company registered by Turnbull changed its name last year to Prime Arbor Capital – I now assume to protect the name until launch.

 

Watch this space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5064331&goto=newpost%5C

 

DonkeyB.. it is mentioned in the MSE link above, with a little more information.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 Sep

Roxburghe call centre hours

 

Mon - Fri: 08:00-20:00

Sat: 09:00-13:00

Sun: Closed

Bank Holidays: Closed

 

17 Sep

Roxburghe call centre hours

 

Mon - Fri: Closed

Sat: Closed

Sun: Closed

Bank Holidays: Closed

 

The “Make a secure payment online” link still seems to be active though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going by comments on the Parking Pranksters blog, there is not much sympathy for the staff who have lost their jobs. I am inclined to agree with them:-

 

If you lie down with dogs, you will get fleas. Anybody who worked for this shabby outfit will have been aware of their reputation, and their intimidatory tactics in attempting to collect so-called 'debts' relating to fake parking tickets.

Somehow I struggle to feel compassion with those who worked for this outfit. If your job is to screw other people then it's good news that you're now the one who is screwed.

 

These are the reasons why the OFT refused to renew their licence:-

 

  • Sending debt collection letters which misrepresented debtors' legal position
  • Misleading and otherwise inappropriate behaviour by HFO and Roxburghe agents during phone calls to debtors
  • Failing to properly investigate disputed debts
  • Failure to respond appropriately to the concerns of regulators, including the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going by comments on the Parking Pranksters blog, there is not much sympathy for the staff who have lost their jobs. I am inclined to agree with them:-

 

If you lie down with dogs, you will get fleas. Anybody who worked for this shabby outfit will have been aware of their reputation, and their intimidatory tactics in attempting to collect so-called 'debts' relating to fake parking tickets.

Somehow I struggle to feel compassion with those who worked for this outfit. If your job is to screw other people then it's good news that you're now the one who is screwed.

 

These are the reasons why the OFT refused to renew their licence:-

 

  • Sending debt collection letters which misrepresented debtors' legal position
  • Misleading and otherwise inappropriate behaviour by HFO and Roxburghe agents during phone calls to debtors
  • Failing to properly investigate disputed debts
  • Failure to respond appropriately to the concerns of regulators, including the OFT.

 

I think that’s just a generous summary. The detail of the group’s activities – visible all over CAG, and especially emanating from Turnbull Rutherford – was astonishing. Good riddance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...