Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

claim form IND/Heggarty on old Lloyds (5 and a half years) credit card debt***Claim Dismissed***


Miscreant
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there.

 

I disputed a credit card account by LloydsTSB back in May 2009.

At the time I was receiving numerous phone calls to multiple households regarding this.

 

Firstly I requested paperwork to be able to arrange a payment plan based on my incoming and outgoings. this form never arrived.

 

I requested a proof of postage as i did not believe this form had been sent out. i never received this either.

 

My closing statement was this:

 

"Therefore I am requesting that you send me a verification and validation of the debt,

I understand that you are required to send this to me by law upon request and that all collections activity must cease until the requested information is provided

- this specifically includes any and all phone calls to any number regarding this issue.

 

Upon receipt of the requested information I would be happy to consider arrangements to repay any money that I legally owe."

 

The letter was sent recorded delivery and from the date of delivery I received no further communication from Lloyds regarding this.

All phone calls stopped and no more letters were sent by Lloyds.

 

Two (apparently) independent debt collectors wrote to me regarding the account and

I wrote back informing them that I was still awaiting documents from Lloyds and that until such documents were received

could they please ensure that they were acting in an appropriate and lawful manner.

Neither company wrote back.

 

2 letters were sent to an address in the last 2 months but were returned to sender.

 

Today a letter arrived from IND acting as claimant for this account with a vastly increased amount now totaling over £5000

 

This seems to be the standard claim form from IND. Northampton Crown Court.

 

I disputed the claim back in 2009 and have not acknowledged it since then.

If I respond to this letter then am I not acknowledging the account again?

 

If I ignore this then what is the worst that can happen? A CCJ?

 

Can I question the legitimacy of IND to even be acting in this way with no CCA or signed contract to be found anywhere?

 

As soon as we reach May 2015 this is 6 years old and null and void.

is this just a last ditch effort to try and scare me into acknowledging this debt?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so you HAVE received a COURT claimform {CCBC N1]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tough

 

NEVER ignore a claimform...ok back to basics FORGET all that has gone on in the past.

 

please fill this out and post the results here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant: IND LTD

Date of Issue: 05 Sept 2014

 

Claim for Lloyds TSB credit card account

 

Value of claim £5184.00

 

Debt was assigned to IND LTD

 

Previous letters were returned unopened as I was not in residence at the property at the time.

Have not received any correspondence since 2009

 

Payments ceased due to a dispute over the interest and penalty charges.

 

Documents were requested from the original creditor which were not provided.

 

Financial problems were communicated to the original creditor relevant paperwork was not sent to be able to enter into a debt management plan.

 

 

I have read the CPR 31.14 request.

Should I add "statement of validation of the debt" to 6:

[any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]?

 

I will send this off pronto.

 

Oh and the original agreement was entered into back in 1996!

 

Within the particulars of the claim is this:

 

Interest under s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 3/1/08 to 5/9/14 of 1,627.93

 

This is longer than 6 years, is this right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you sent this" Request for validation of the debt" what were you expecting to receive?

 

What you should have done was a CCA request together with the £1 statutory fee, without this I'm not at all surprised you received nothing back.

 

The interest will until judgement or earlier payment so it's right.

 

A CCA request is what you need to do now.

CPR31.14 will probably get the response that Claims Issued via NCCBCC cannot have documents attached.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wanted was a validation and verification of the debt. Proof of accounting that showed Lloyds were at any kind of a loss.

 

I want to re-iterate that the phone was ringing non stop, 9pm on a Sunday night, calling multiple households. This was happening on a daily basis and was consistent. They were also sending many letters.

 

Once I had sent this initial letter with the request on the end the phone calls stopped dead and did not start again. I also received no more letters from Lloyds. The collections activities from lloyds ceased with immediate effect and did not start again. Lloyds have not contacted me directly regarding this debt since they received my letter.

 

I am happy to do a CCA request was was waiting for Lloyds to respond before I did this they just never did.

 

I can send one now. I was only going to send a CPR31.14 as per instructions in the post above.

 

Thanks.

Edited by Miscreant
Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request to IND is a MUST

 

if sols are mentioned send them the CPR

 

if IND get a CCA request out of Lloyds for a 1996 Credit CArd ...NO CHANCE!! i'll eat my hat

 

have you ACk'd the claim..Defend all?

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you stopped payments for whatever reason,

 

dispute or no dispute the creditor will be at a loss,

 

if you have dispute start with the obvious such as the CCA request and if PPI /reclaimable penalty charges are a part of the debt a SAR is needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Miscreant and welcome to CAG

 

The time line for you to follow is provided in the link by DX above post #5...

 

You dont have to complete any forms... all can be submitted on line if you follow the instructions on the claim form.

 

If you are defending you defend all...you are not counter claiming (I assume?)

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just do as advised for now

nothing more

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi there. I sent a CCA request to IND last week. I sent it recorded delivery signed for, which is how I send everything.

 

As of yet they have not signed and received it.

 

Is there perhaps another address rather than the PO Box that they give?

 

Can they just refuse to sign for it and therefore not have to adhere to my request?

 

Acknowledgement of service has been submitted and I will now pursue IND for proof of claim. I will also hit Heggarty with a subject access request and IND with the same.

 

Do I have any grounds to contact Lloyds as the original creditor or is it better to remain out of contact with them seeing as I have been waiting 5 and a half years for their response to my last letter?

 

I assume that all of this will be submitted as my defense so the more groundwork I do now to deal with this directly the better?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would only approach the original creditor if IND failed to provide any information that is vital to your defence.

Not CPR or CCA requests

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep you don't need to do any sar's to anyone.

 

 

Even if they fail the CCA

you still DONT miss your filing date.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply from IND today regarding my CCA request.

 

they have requested a copy from the original creditor (Lloyds) and will (apparently) forward me a copy of this once they receive it.

 

In light of this they have agreed to an extension of 28 days on the time allowed for me to file my defence.

 

They say I must inform the court of this in writing.

 

There is a dodgy squiggle at the bottom with IND LIMITED underneath. Haha.

 

I assume that this is 28 days on top of the time I had already been allowed (currently standing at about 14 days)

so I now have 42 days to submit my defence?

 

Can I notify the court of the extension through the online service or shall I just write them a short letter explaining what has happened?

 

Thanks for all your help so far,

 

 

already feeling better about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as such you can disregard what they say

 

you file the no paperwork/holding defence by your org deadline regardless.

 

they should not be filing a claim

hoping for a default non contested judgement.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

So by "no paperwork/holding defence" is there a preset method or template for dealing with this situation?

 

Can I do this through the online form?

 

I'm just asking as I do not want to give too much information.

 

Or can it just be really simple. eg.

 

"I am defending all of this claim as I dispute that the Claimant has any proof of claim and without such paperwork there is no cause for this matter to continue."

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes in many many threads in the forum you are in

and the DCA legal successes forum too

 

 

But you must adapt it to YOUR PoC.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you need to file by 4pm 7th October

 

a good few days away yet.

 

pers I'd be waiting incase the CCA turns up.

 

post your defence here before you file it via MCOL

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Within the particulars of the claim is this:

 

Interest under s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 3/1/08 to 5/9/14 of 1,627.93

 

This is longer than 6 years, is this right?

 

 

just to add.

 

if there is judgment against, then challenge this.

 

6 yrs worth may be regarded as unreasonable.

 

around 1 yrs worth has been seen as reasonable in court (and some cred partics of claim re stat interest properly reflect that).

 

is for the j to decide at the end (if judgment) in consideration of the circs. eg why has it taken 6 yrs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...