Jump to content


me and CPP reclaim


Dragonlaird
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3523 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

An interesting topic for me as I just read this in the CAG mailshot.

 

As most people do,

I skim these mailings "in case" there is something interesting/useful then move on to more pressing emails

like the usual spam for increasing the size of my manhoo... erm bank account.

 

 

This one surprised me as I've been a subscriber of Experian's Credit Expert for quite a while now.

 

 

Like many people, I rarely read the T&Cs of a reputable(?) company when I agree to a *FREE* trial

and I provided my credit card details as requested (over SSL - remember, they're reputable) to allow them to confirm

and subsequently charge for their credit checking service, if I wanted to continue after the free trial.

 

 

Since then, my old credit card has expired and I've renewed my details using my Debit card as I found their service quite useful

- checking my credit status, confirming my details were correct etc.

 

All of the above is a prelim to my questions (2 off - bear with me).

 

I don't recall seeing anything about their supposed ID protection when I signed up to the free trial (quite a few years ago now),

maybe this didn't exist then?

 

 

Perhaps like most, it was in the T&Cs and I simply checked the "Yeah whatever" button?.

 

After a couple of years of using their service,

I started receiving emails from them saying my online exposure was fine -

My thoughts were "Thanks Experian, didn't expect this

- Nice to see my money is being invested,

I thought I was paying to see what the lenders had access to but now I see you're providing me with a pseudo real-time service".

 

After another year or 2, my bank sent me a text saying my account was overdrawn.

 

Strange... I phoned my bank, my identity had been stolen and someone had attempted 2 transfers totalling around £2000 to other (unknown) accounts.

 

My bank were very quick to refund the money (same day so no charges were incurred)

and apart from signing a pre-printed letter they sent to say I did not know the intended recipient(s),

the matter was resolved (from my perspective).

 

Now, my 2 questions are this... (*phew* - Told you to bear with me)....

 

1. If I received emails telling me my online profile is safe/good etc

(BTW - They also have me listed as Rating 999 - A safe credit risk).

How was it that my bank account was hacked [i forgot to mention, the ID theft also involved blocking access to my online login]?

 

 

I'm extremely careful when I use my bank card and I never give personal details to unauthorised persons

- Damn, I even help stop the [s-p-a-m]mers (CAG renames "s.p.a.m" [no dots] to "problem")

on the phone and a lot more behind the scenes.

 

 

2. If I had insurance

- Wouldn't I have used it in this circumstance (had I known about it)?

Or would it even have have been covered since my bank (god bless them) dealt with it entirely?

 

 

So am I potentially owed a: a refund of insurance money as the service was not provided or b: compensation for my identity being stolen>

 

Maybe I should put in a claim to refund the payments I've apparently made for this service,

that I never knew existed or I had paid for.

 

 

I'm truly dismayed that PIP (essentially this is what they have [mis]sold - Insurance I didn't ask for,

tagged on to my monthly payments without me realising)

exists outside the banking industry but I suppose given the close relationship,

I should be surprised.

Edited by Dragonlaird
Link to post
Share on other sites

time to reclaim then

 

 

get it in quick

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...