Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406231-the-pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims-is-made-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-as-head-of-civil-justice-1st-oct-2017/#comment-5145126  
    • Quick update. I've now recieved a letter before action from them with a PAP form to return enclosed, still no credit agreement however. I assume just a case of following the PAP thread and returning form with no CCA as the reason?
    • Thanks for coming back and letting us know. Obviously we totally disagree with their decision.  Their remortgaging could only have gone wrong if they had ended up with a CCJ.  And how do you get a CCJ?  If you lose in court and then defy the court and don't pay.  Even if you lose in court, you don't get a CCJ as long as you pay within the 30 days ordered by the court.  Even had they lost in court the judge would have disallowed the interest and the £70 Unicorn Food Tax that PE made up.  There was no advantage whatsoever for giving in and paying now. But thanks to you for letting us know - a hell of a lot of users don't.
    • Hi everyone.   Before I say anything, TFL finally responded to the email I sent last week:   Thank you for your email, we acknowledge the signed documents you have returned in preparation for your hearing.   We note that this matter is causing you some stress and anxiety, however this is not a reason for TfL to discontinue proceedings. It is not unusual for passengers that have been summonsed to court to experience these symptoms, and we do have some empathy with your concerns.   However, as previously stated, TfL do not accept out of court settlements, and you will have the opportunity at your hearing, to provide your mitigation to the court prior to a decision being reached by them on how they intend to deal with this matter (usually a fine).   I am sorry that this decision is not more favourable.   Yours sincerely   James Vallis     At least he sounds more sympathetic in this email…   Only one week to go until the court hearing and I am so so nervous. I’ve prepared some questions and answers in preparation for what to say to the magistrate. It will help calm me down if I know roughly what to expect. If you could give feedback on it that would be great. If you have anything to add please do let me know.   As far as I know the court hearing will happen in these stages: Introduction and statement of facts Pleading guilty for the journeys I made with my mother’s card Penalty sentencing Appeal (if charged with a criminal record)   Am I guilty? Yes.   Why did I not pay the fare legally? Last year there was a lot going on in my life and I was struggling financially so to relieve some of this I used my mother’s Oyster card. I know it’s not an excuse and it’s still wrong.   Why do I not accept a criminal record? I really don’t want it to affect my chances of finding a job in the future. I will be the one earning money in my family so I am doing my best and studying hard to be able to get a good job. A criminal record would mean that regardless of how hard I’m working I won’t get the job I want after I graduate. This fills me with so much regret, sadness and disappointment in myself. I just want to be a good daughter for my mother because she’s already had to deal with many hardships in her life and I don’t want to make it any harder for her.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax and NI not paid by employer for apprenticeship.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son has worked for an employer for 3 years under an approved apprenticeship. They have deducted tax and NI from his wages but haven't paid it. He hasn't been given anything from them in the way of a P45 or any other wage slips, and the apprentice scheme has now asked him to lie that he's passed all levels on NVQ even though they haven't checked anything from the start.

 

He has now left the company.

 

What to do? The company have evaded tax and the agency that sent him have lied. He's not going to be credited with paying tax or NI. I've assured him he's not the one in trouble, his wages have been debited but he's worrying that he's going to get in trouble too if he reports it.

 

 

Any thoughts? I can deal with it but just asking if anyone else has any advice to add?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he have a contract of "Employment" ???

 

As I understand this.... (I admit it's been a few years since I "Employed" anyone .....

But from what I recall.

If a person worked for "X" company for more than 6 or 8 weeks then that person was "Deemed" in "Full time employment".

It was then up to the "Company" to deduct Tax and NI. .... And pay it and "Their contribution" to HMRC.

 

I think you should report to HMRC.

Your Son has done nothing wrong.

 

See what the "Legal Crew" say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you say "the scheme" have asked him to lie, who do you mean?

 

did he earn enough to pay tax and NI?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis are you saying the employer has not paid tax and NI? I'm not sure why he would whether or not the employer has paid the tax.

 

If there is a suspicion that this has not happened the appropriate course of action would be to report them to HMRC.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company will be getting a training allowance from the government so you can check up with the assessment centre whether they have been following the requirements of the training body. If the prevaricate on this contact the awards body directly. I would also say your son should check whether his NI and tax contributions have been paid, this is easy as long as he knows his NI number.

Youi mention agency, cant see how an agency can be involved in an apprenticeship as they have their own special terms of employment. Some apprentices are pais a bursary which is not taxable. check to see if that is what is claimed for his employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all.

 

He's had nothing at all from them, no contract given. He earned enough to pay tax and NI and they deducted it from his wages. His tax allowance also increased and they still took the same amount so he has in fact overpaid 'tax' which the company hasn't forwarded.

 

He didn't seek the job directly, he was placed by an apprentice agency. Well I say agency but it's linked to a college. I won't name them as it will harm anything that is held against them in the future. It's best not to name any names if legal action could be taken against them by the relevant authorities.

 

A lot of things were going on in the company that he wasn't happy with. Insurance fraud, possibly employing illegals and people that were claiming not to be working, as well as completely ignoring any consumer rights for customers. He didn't want to rock the boat while he was working for them but now he has found another job.

 

No he didn't have a CIS card but he does have one now on CITB for his new job.

 

When I said he was asked to lie - He contacted the 'agency or apprentice scheme operator, whatever it's called', and they said because he was leaving before the 3 years they would say he had finished it and award him the NVQ 3 regardless and not to say anything about it if anyone asked. Nothing has been done in the way of assessment. His employer was inacapable of it and he just periodically received a certificate through the post to say he'd achieved levels.

 

You've all pretty much confirmed my thoughts so I'll follow that up and try to prevent them doing the same in the future.

 

Thanks and will let you know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NVQ providers get regular, detailed audits. I don't think this is going to wash! I'd get in front of the college.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

he should take the matter up with the examining agency or if it is to do with the building trade the CITB would be a good place to seek advice on how to progress. Also, try and find out if the agency that placed him in the scheme has bona fides or is just a middleman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

The main issue is that the company where he was placed haven't forwarded the NI and Tax deductions they took to HMRC. They have kept the money and it seems they have no intention of paying it. I'll sort it out for him and I think the company will be closing fairly soon! The agency was reputable but obviously they have failed on overseeing his placement and giving the qualifications.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...