Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim against RBOS


fhm1978
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have just finished my letter claiming £1328 in charges over the last 5 years, i'm quite surprised how much it is, all those £28 here and £35 there sure add up!!

 

Anyway I sent them the initialletter asking for the £1328 and sent them a breakdown of the charges and dates they were charged to my account (i hope thats right!).

 

I've posted the letter recorded delivery to:

 

Royal Bank Of Scotland

Senior Customer Relations Manager

The Forthstone

56 South Gyle Crescent

Edinburgh

EH12 9JN

 

 

Fingers crossed i will hear back in the next 14 days!

 

Its wierd, but i actually like the Royal Bank...though i don't like them enough to give them £1300!!!

 

I'll keep the board updated on the progress.

 

Thanks for all the advise!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I recieved a letter from the Royal Bank today explaining that the charges were fair and transparent and that they would not refund them.

 

I sent a reply (the LBA letter) today. I'm not 100% sure if i should have left it another 7 days before sending this or not. On my understading in the first letter i gave them 14 days to respond, as they responded (even though it wasn't positive) I can send off a letter saying im not happy with their response!

 

Is that right?! I hope so!

 

I have been reading through the progress of everyones claims and think it is an amazing form of 'People Power'. The support offered by people in this forum is great and very positive. I am slightly daunted at the prospect of having to go to court as i am in Scotland, the small claims process seems complicated. However, reading through the posts is giving me the confidence to continue!!

 

Thanks again...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...