Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
    • In the SAR, I received the original application, lots of computer print outs, yearly statements from 2013 and the new emails regarding my complaint. They sent me a £50 cheque after I chased them for the SAR after the 30 days. They said they was waiting for me to respond to an email (which I never received) before sending the SAR
    • classic P2G. I'm sure dianne and Lesley will pop an email to you at some point.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Potential Job - Sounds a bit suspicious to me


essexmat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is the wrong section - just after some thoughts and advice

 

Hi. I applied for a job last week based in the home counties where I live. After I applied I got the email confirmation through and done some research and it has been advertised on Monster and UJM (I know they are linked somehow)

 

Anyway, 15 minutes ago I got a call from a mobile number saying I had been short listed and could I come for an interview on Tuesday. Even at short notice I agreed and they said they would send me details by email or text (not got it yet) The salary is £25k p/a and for where it is based that is high so that got me thinking straight away and maybe even though it was advertised as a senior admin post the company is sales and marketing so wondering if it is POTENTIAL to be 25k and a very low annual salary.

 

To add to my suspicions I asked the company name and they said it was Solar Power GB Ltd so I looked it up and it is a family run business - looks a legit website but the address for contact is based in Braintree Essex and seems a residential address and I was told job was Brentwood which I guess could be the office address.

 

The ad also said contact XXXXX for an interview - apparantly I have been short listed though, Hmmm. Now it will cost me £21 to get there and that is money I can ill afford to lose for something that is already giving me suspicions.

 

Something doesn't feel right with this from the salary, location, website, how late they have left it to contact me, needing someone immediately etc. Obviously if I do go and was offered the job I would want a contract of employment, salary details etc before I even thought of starting - something also tells me it will end up being a sales rather than admin role. To add to this, it is Bank Hol weekend and I have no details of where interview is, who is interviewing etc - they simply said we will email or text you details and there are no assessments it is just a chat etc.

 

Am I right to be suspicious about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly my thoughts, too many things seem wrong with it - if a job was £25k and local it would me more than 'a chat' and also I would have had details by now. Think I will give this one a swerve unless I get a formal email with all details on it by Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done all I can, application, company research which shows a residential address as the head office, website says "family run business" Got the JD from Monster which then directed me via Company Confidential via UJM. I have left a voicemail on the number that rang me, left a message on their website and unless I get details of where I am going on Tuesday morning it is a simply wild goose chase. I can do no more, unless I have an address I cannot go and their website doesn't give an office address only the home residential address. All sounds a bit suss to me and I can ill afford to lose £21 on a whim

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it all seems to good to be true then in my experience it is. Don't touch it with a barge pole.

 

i agree with this person.

 

inless u get a phone call or whatever with more info then go ahead and get more info but for me i would not got near it just dont sound right to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can add is that the address they give in Rayne, Braintree is a farm with quite a number of commercial units (google earth) There are other businesses there as well. I see that they've recently advertised 8 posts at their new office in Brentwood. So I would say they are a legit company of Installers but what sort of job they're offering I couldn't say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try asking them their policy on interview expenses.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ad also said contact XXXXX for an interview - apparantly I have been short listed though, Hmmm. Now it will cost me £21 to get there and that is money I can ill afford to lose for something that is already giving me

 

Am I right to be suspicious about this?

 

First thing Tuesday morning, ring your Ingeus "adviser" and instruct them to provide travel expenses for this interview - Might as well get something out of the buggers.... If they won't play ball, inform them that they would miss out on any 'job outcome' payments.

 

As for the job its self - It could be £25K+commission....

 

Side note: I have had a run in with a solar power company in Essex, and Brentwood is vaguely familiar - The outfit called an ex-directory TPS registered number and got a right ear bashing after waking me up (had just finished a night shift).

 

Just make sure the job doesn't involve telesales and/or cold calling - You don't want me on the other end of the line :mad2:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it all seems to good to be true then in my experience it is. Don't touch it with a barge pole.

 

Have to agree with you i am afraid..

 

My Husband had an interview the other day, salary was 25k + when he got there, no salary it was self employed and the 25k+ is what you could earn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing Tuesday morning, ring your Ingeus "adviser" and instruct them to provide travel expenses for this interview - Might as well get something out of the buggers.... If they won't play ball, inform them that they would miss out on any 'job outcome' payments.

 

 

Ingeus very rarely pay you travel expenses upfront, well mine certainly doesn't. it gets paid into your bank account 1-2 days after your interview.

and they only pay you 25p a mile anyway.

 

The job sounds well fishy so id give it a miss if i was you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

 

No calls, no texts, no emails - basically it sounds like a [problem] via a 'job' advertised on Company Confidential which links the 'job' to UJM. I have left messages on the number I was contacted on as well as on their website but don't expect any response. I am certainly NOT going on a wild goose chase tomorrow. Is there anywhere I can report this posting on UJM? Basically, I am more or less certain it is a telesales job with a sh*t salary plus commission and is falsely advertised.

 

FOUND THE REPORT FUNCTION ON MONSTER - NOW REPORTED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try asking them their policy on interview expenses.

The employer will have a budget for recruitment.... and, in future, when an interview is offered, respond by suggesting that you will confirm attendance subject to the employer providing written confirmation that all travelling expenses accrued will be reimbursed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...