Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC-metropolitan-hillesden-DLC-mercantile- now cabot


Cookalina
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quick question.

 

If you have already had a bad debt (sorry minds gone blank on the word) on your credit file for 5 years on a debit (the 5 years is now over)

and the creditor can't find ur CCA agreement and you moved home.

 

Forgot to inform the creditor and

 

a letter from a different creditor (11of them) turns up on your door step.

 

(10 statements and one letter to say I've failed to inform them).

 

Can they issue a CCJ against my file on the same debt?

 

Also do I have to inform them I now do live at this address.

 

They asked me to contact them without further delay to confirm

 

how I propose to lay off my outstanding balance (like that's going to happen)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you dont inform them and they get a ccj then it is much harder to get a set aside because the claom was served at the last known good address.

 

Also cag doesnt condone debt avoidance. Can you give some background on this debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Some advise please if you can. Long story short.

 

I had a debt with HSBC (2004)

 

I defaulted and had a red tick debt on my account for 5 years (sorry my mind has gone blank and I can't think off the word)

Went to credit collectors.

I was paying monthly.

 

Suddenly out the blue I get a voicemail on phone(2008) from another creditor saying I owe them the debt.

 

I seeked advise on the consumer forum.

 

Wrote a letter to the 'new' debt collector agency asking for my CCA.

They can't find it....

Being getting statements ever since.

 

I moved home earlier this year

advised all my creditors but

forgot about the DLC as I only get a yearly statement.

 

Today I came home to 11 letters from DLC 10 statement pages and

one letter saying I've failed to inform them of my new address.

 

I must confirm this is my new address and

 

how I wish to proceed to pay the balance (yeah right -they can't find my original CCA I'm currently not paying).

 

Do I have to write back to them?

 

If I do does it show that I agree the debt is mine?

 

Can they get a CCJ on my old address on the same debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

not since Jan 2008.

 

When the new company voicemailed me.

as I was not sure who they were and was worried if I start paying them I could then get letters from the other company too.

 

I sent them a letter (after finding the CAG) to ask for my original CCA

and they are still looking for it.

 

I've not paid them anything since.

 

They even tried to send me a standard letter by recorded delivery to get my signature.

 

Luckily I was soon hung over the day the post man came that my BF signed for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took out loan back in 2001.

Had trouble paying it back.

2004 Defaulted.

Set up a payment agreement which was with a creditor.

Was paying back each month.

 

2008 different creditor calls me out the blue.

Since original debt 2004 I've moved 4 times.

 

Creditors/HSBC

Can't find my original CCA

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them. It will be sb in a month so theyre doing evertything possible to get you to pay or admit it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You arent obliged to tell them that you moved. However as already advised, if they were to obtain a CCJ at the old address, then they would have served the papers correctly and unless you had another good reason for a set aside, incorrect service could not be one of them.

 

Was there any PPI on this loan or maybe charges that could reduce it.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Long story shorty.

Got into debt, HSBC sold loan to metropolitan I was paying them with out any issues,

suddenly I get a call from hillesden demanding money and my debt is with them.

 

I contacted consumer forum, was advise to get copy of credit agreement gone through all the letters etc..(this was 2009).

Accounts on hold until they find my original copy of credit agreement.

 

My account has since been sold to DLC- mercantile back to DLC-and

 

today back to mercantile who now asked me for to complete a customer affordability statement.

Shall I just sit back and do nothing?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

They did not sell the debt to Metropolitan. Metropolitan are part of the HSBC group - their inhouse collection agents.

 

Have you actually received from Hillsden group a Notice of Assignment ?

 

If there was already an agreement for a reduced payment plan in place with HSBC/Met Collect then Hillsden are obliged to continue with that plan.

 

Have a read of the following.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?840-Stop-your-bank-or-lender-breaching-their-instalment-agreement

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I'm going back 5years now so all I can remember is that they wanted more for my monthly payments.

I started a thread on this site but it be 5 years ago and on an old email address.

 

All I've was receiving from hillesden was a letter to say they are following up my request for original documentation with HSBC, my accounts on hold and further action been suspended in anticipation of receiving the doc required.

 

I Was getting this (or a letter as similar, from February 2009 until nov 2010) then DLC letters March 2011, then hillesden letter may and June 2011.

 

Then DLC sept 2011,

mercantile dec 2011 (settlement letter£694 to pay off £2776 ) DLC March 2012,

DLC statement Acc dec2012, dec 2013,jan 2014, 20 February

14april 14- letter advising my accounts going to mercantile mercantile may 14

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Long story short.

HSBC loan 2001

-went into repayment with debt collector 2005

-get call from a different debt collector collector 2007

- I question the debt and contact CAG

-asked for original application signed by me

- account went to statute barred.

Not heard a thing for around 6 + years.

 

Today letter from Cabot/ruthbridge saying we have not come to a mutual agreement.

Never heard of them in the past.

My account as far as I’m aware is status barred.

Am I right?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 threads merged for complete history

 

the debt is now statute barred

 

send then our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of our library

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well under the new FCA conc rules they should then crease all comms

if you've not officially written informing them of your correct address then even if its SB theres nothing to stop them getting a CCJ using an old address.

 

the days of ignoring debt and then hoping it gets to SB ended years ago.

unless they are told its statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...