Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Annuity funds no more :-(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have points of reference for failed pension schemes they could nudge me in the direction of please?

 

No urgency (I'm 46 so it'll probably all change before I get there)

 

For a little background, I paid into a scheme for 20 years to a total of something iro 60k, my employer ( I thought) was matching same but apparently took a few years off here and there and paid nothing into the scheme during its final 4 years.

 

I received a notice from the trustees and L&G who now manage the fund about 4 years ago advising it was only able to sustain those already in retirement or due to retire within the next 2 years.

 

Do I have any recourse to recover anything at retirement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike

 

Contact the Pension Advisory Service and they should point you in the right direction. Pensions are a bit of a minefield.

 

There is a pensions regulator who can look into complaints.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Do you know what type of scheme you paid into please? Was it final salary [defined benefit] or money purchase [defined contribution]?

 

And over the years, did you receive any correspondence about employer contributions and whether they were being paid or not?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning UB & HB, thanks to both of you for looking in.

 

I think I'm going to have to trawl through the loft to be sure, I was 20 when I joined the scheme and whilst I've got a fair idea of who, what, where and when I'm not 100% on the facts.

 

From memory there were 3 schemes all contribution based all with differing levels of benefit, death in service, widow pension etc. Scheme 1 was 3%, 2 was 4% and 3 was 6% with additional vc's capped at 5% and employer contributions capped at Max 6% match.

 

I paid in at 6% for the first ten years and 9% for the latter 10 years. I seem to remember receiving notices from the trustees perhaps 3 or 4 times over the whole period advising there would be no employer contributions in a given year.

 

Will do some digging during the week and see what I can find.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Honeybee & uncleb

 

Hopefully you'll spot this and have a better understanding of it than me

 

After much pestering it turns out there was an error in the data held by L&G, it seems an issue I had with national insurance prefix threw a spanner in the works...to cut a long story short my employer at the time recorded my NI number NM instead of NP and my contributions went walkabout for the first 12 years of employment!

 

Have now discovered I joined the scheme on my 18th and left employment (and the scheme) when I turned 37... so 19 years total.

 

Anyway... I finally have a breakdown of pension benefit for normal retirement date which is made up of 4 elements

 

1. Pre 88 secured minimum pension £52.08

2. Post 88 secured minimum pension £1579.92

3. Standard revaluing pension £5285.76

4. Post 97 pension £2088.72

 

Total at date of leaving service in 2004 = £9006.48

 

It then goes on to state that 1 & 2 grow at 6.25% compound per annum from 2004 to retirement, then at 3% compound thereafter.

 

3 & 4 grow at RPI to 2010 then CPI thereafter to retirement age ( I think this has averaged circa 2.5% since 2004?), then at 3% compound thereafter.

 

I had a brief chat with them today regarding up to date figures and they advise they'll be writing back to me within the next few days.

 

Not sure what tools there are available online to compare the values with the known amounts I paid in, do these look reasonable?? I thought they looked OK but that may be more to do with what I thought I didn't have a few months back :-(

 

Also contracted out of serps and been self employed for the last few years so not exactly sure what entitlement I'll have to any state pension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beyond my level of knowledge unfortunately. You need someone who deals with pensions on a regular basis to answer this.

 

If you google pension calculators there are many, but I am not sure whether any would help.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with the advice to talk to The Pensions Advisory Service. Very complex area, impossible to answer properly here. I question whether it has anything to do with Annuities, it seems to be about an occupational pension scheme. It sounds as if this might have been a defined benefits (final salary) pension scheme because employers usually only take 'contribution holidays' in those sort of schemes. A common reason for scheme members being told what you've been told is because the employer has gone out of business leaving the pension scheme underfunded. If that's the case there is a government fund called the Pension Potection Fund designed to take over payment of some of the benefits (up to certain limits). This might be relevant to your situation - or it might not. Get specialist advice, and do it now - don't wait until you're 65!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both, no worries.. I hear what you're saying.

 

Re: annuity; its been the better part of 30 years so my memory is a little hazy. I did manage to find the original bumf and it was def an annuity purchase scheme at inception although I'm aware the scheme changed several times over the years (what I did with the paperwork I haven't a Scooby) Defined benefits (final salary) were only available to management in the early years. My policy is described as a part of a bulk annuity agreed between L&G and the trustees. The business sold up its UK interests in 2007 so no longer trades here.

 

Had a chat with TPAS who advised what info to ask for and why so they can provide me with a little insight into what's gone on and whether everything is now an accurate representation, very helpful people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...