Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OH's RBS CC debt been paying moorcroft for years - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I've a general question and not sure where to post it, so Mods please move if I'm in the wrong place!

 

Since November 2009, my husband has been paying £120 per month to Moorcroft for an old RBS credit card debt.

 

My question is: why does his credit report on Noddle show "DF" (for "default") every month since November 2009? Surely, if he's been paying this amount in line with what he agreed with Moorcroft, it should be reflected in his credit report?

 

Any help or advice will be most appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well no as its still in default.

 

however 'markers' have no real impact

 

its the defaulted date in the summary that the important one.

 

tell us about the card please

 

how old

 

and do robbersway own the debt

or is it still listed with RBS?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, and thanks for your reply.

 

The debt is still listed as being with RBS

- or at least it was right up until this week,

when we received a reply from our letter to Moorcroft questioning the "default" markers.

 

It's now be removed entirely from my husband's credit report.

 

I'm guessing it's been removed while Moorcroft take the matter up with RBS

(as they've said they will do in their letter)?

 

The account is very old - originally opened in 1990,

and fell into default when he was made redundant in late 2008.

 

The balance was originally something like £11,000, but is now approx. £4,300.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so its now fallen off the CRa file

 

as the org defaulkt has reached 6yrs

never to return.

 

have you all the statements?

 

for a major bank to sell an £11k debt

there must have been something wrong with it I suspect.

 

not got PPI

or loads of £12 penalty charges have you?

 

if you don't know

 

i'd send RBS an SAR

 

i'd also be sending moorcrap a CCA request too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope that the debt is still with RBS

and its not been sold on

 

and your payments to moorcrap

have all been going off the debt to RBS

 

sadly I have my doubts on the latter

 

strange you've not been getting statements mind.

 

have always lived at the same address?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware, the debt has been sold to Moorcroft as my husband doesn't get any communication from RBS at all. We moved from Berkshire to Essex in 2009, and my husband let Moorcroft know of his new address, so all we now get is a yearly statement from Moorcroft (although we have access online to his account with Moorcroft to view payment dates and account balance).

Link to post
Share on other sites

if that cra file of last week

listed the owner as rbs then its not been sold.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urmm

 

ok I suspect you never informed RBS or any of your creditors of your new address

which you legally should do.

 

ofcourse, Moorcroft would find you or quickly contact you to find that out

but they are not obliged to tell RBS..funny game.

 

I hope you've not been paying/corresponding via the phone with moorcrap?

 

they are a DCA

DCA's ARE NOT BAILIFFS

 

and have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband only informed Moorcroft of our new address, but not RBS

- he just thought Moorcroft were the only point of contact.

 

He (I, on his behalf) correspond with Moorcroft only via letter, never by phone.

 

My husband isn't particularly au fait (nor even really interested) in dealing with this debt to any great degree,

he's happy just to keep plodding on paying them their £120 a month, which he's been doing since 2009.

 

When the debt first arose, he was very panicked, unemployed, going through his father's sudden death

and in the midst of some quite severe emotional and financial turmoil

- he had no idea that consumer credit law exists to protect the consumer from sharks like Moorcroft,

nor the mental reserves with which to argue with them.

 

I was much more savvy about it, having been through a business failure and bankruptcy

- although being as we weren't yet married, nor living together at that point, he didn't tell me much about his finances.

 

He doesn't receive phone calls from them, only the very occasional letter saying

they're open to negotiating a figure to clear the debt, which he never responds to.

 

What he's concerned about, now, is that we may be looking to purchase a property next year,

but with damning defaults such as this on his credit report,

I suspect we'll be lucky to get anything like a decent rate.

 

Then again, the record will be 6 years old by November next year, and so will naturally "fall off" his record anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you said the debt had already dropped off?

 

goes on the defaults 6th birthday.

 

ok its good your ok with dealing with them.

 

ofcourse if Moorcroft have offer a discount again that's a sign of lots to reclaim!!

 

also look at their letters

 

it will say 'our client' that should give away the true owner.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...