Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

woolwich mortgage/esurv valuation


simaandscott
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my wife and i are currently attempting to buy a new build property, we managed to get approved for the mortgage with the woolwich/barclays, however we have had major problems with the valuation of the property.the woolwich use a company called esurv. on the 7th of march esurv visisted the site and conducted a survey of our potential property off plan as the property has not been built yet.the asking price of our property is £524,995.the surveyor valued the property at £460,000!!!this is a new build redrow 5 bed detached house that is being built next door to a 4 bed detached house that is being bought for £460,000, the 4 bed house was also surveyed by esurv!!obviously the woolwich are now refusing to release our mortgage offer due to the issue of the vaulation, they are also saying that they trust esurv and will not investigate further.this is despite the fact that redrow have just released more houses for sale and the 5 bed we are attempting to buy has now had its asking price increased to £534,995 and that the same 4 bed detached houses are now being sold for £482,995!!me and the wife are now at a loss (literally and finacially) as to what to do now. there seems to be a complete lack of common sense and it beggars belief that in this day and age nothing can be done!! any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciatedthanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Simaandscott and welcome to CAG

 

Unhelpful posts and associated replies have been removed as they added nothing of use to your dilemma.

 

Given the problem with the valuation being so comparatively low, and what you stand to lose if the mortgage is not forthcoming, you might have to spend out on an alternative valuation.

 

I assume you have already given the Woolwich the relevant figures about the other properties on the site. If so, how have they responded.

 

Perhaps the bank will agree to another valuation by a local Chartered Surveyor, either chosen by them or by you. But I think you will have to pay some, if not all, of the extra cost.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have had exact same issue with Woolwich and esurv. Trying to buy a flat for 155k and esurv valued it at 130k a whole 25k difference. An identical flat to this one (next door) sold last year for 150k and others I have spoken to think the surveyor is way off in his estimate. Phoned esurv they say their hands are tied by the Woolwich and cannot review the the estimate with out the say so from the Woolwich even though the guy i spoke to was surprised by the size of the discrepancy. Worked my way in up the chain of people in Woolwich simply to be told they refuse to challenge the survey unless there is at least a 25% discrepancy. They don't seem to care about the fact that i have paid for the survey and refuse to untie esurv hands and allow it to be reviewed. They also refuse to allow me to pay for an independent surveyor or even pay for another esurv surveyor, the entire application stands solely on the say so of the one surveyor with no recourse what so ever to challenge his judgment. Apparently it is now their policy since of January to not review any valuations from esurv and the first esurv valuation as gospel. Anyone applying for a Woolwich mortgage just hope you get a good surveyor or you'll be throwing good money down the drain without a chance of seeing it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kandaras and welcome to CAG

 

I hope you get useful help here on the site.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

If Esurv are anything to do with it run a mile get another survey company no matter what it costs. Esurv valued my property and did a property risk assessment they did not advise me it had serious structural problem. Final outcome was I refused to pay the mortgage as the Woolwich had instructed them and the house which at one stage was valued at £525,000 is now worth £30,000. Run away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...