Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. Pro-bono means 'free'
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics


joeski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my friend cancelled his JSA claim today and has appointment booked with his ingeus advisor tomorrow, he has asked me if he can still get sanctioned for not attending as he is switching from JSA to ESA? sorry to keep going on but he keeps asking me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well there is no JSA to sanction as its now closed, I dont believe a new ESA claim would be sanctioned as the JSA agreement doesnt apply to ESA?

 

thanks, he still hasn't put in a claim for ESA yet as he couldn't get an appointment with his doctor till this friday. i didn't think he had an agreement if you are on ESA :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

tI didn't think he had an agreement if you are on ESA :/

 

A different set of rules apply for ESA claimants. You are correct in thinking that the JSAg does not apply. However, (I'm pretty sure) he will still have to attend mandatory Work Programme appointments unless he gets put in to the support group (unlikely).

 

But as his JSA claim is now closed and he has yet to apply for ESA, no benefit doubts or sanctions could be imposed for missing today's appointment - I assume he has notified the "adviser" at Ingeus that he is no longer claiming. If he hasn't, they would still go through the motions even if it is a pointless exercise on their part.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A different set of rules apply for ESA claimants. You are correct in thinking that the JSAg does not apply. However, (I'm pretty sure) he will still have to attend mandatory Work Programme appointments unless he gets put in to the support group (unlikely).

 

But as his JSA claim is now closed and he has yet to apply for ESA, no benefit doubts or sanctions could be imposed for missing today's appointment - I assume he has notified the "adviser" at Ingeus that he is no longer claiming. If he hasn't, they would still go through the motions even if it is a pointless exercise on their part.

 

he told his advisor via email that he had canceled his JSA claim and won't be attending the appointment, he hasn't heard anything back from them. his has not yet applied for ESA so does that mean he's no longer considered as been on the WP? also i don't understand ESA so im guessing he'll be put in WRAG :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr P is right, he will still be on the WP.

 

I have no idea what the WP will do to your friend whilst he is on ESA assessment rate, can people on ESA assessment rate be sanctioned is the question?

 

how can somebody be sanctioned on a claim they haven't even made yet? the jobcentre asked if he would be going onto ESA and he replied yes but he hasn't called them to make the claim or filled out the form and sent it off to apply yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i friend received a 'good reason' letter today because he did not attend an appointment with his advisor on 25th February, he canceled his JSA claim on the 24th so basically this letter been sent is a waste of time as he currently has no claim running to sanction..or will be be sanctioned if he makes another claim? :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

He should fill in and return the "good reason" letter within the next day or two and simply state:

My claim for JSA was closed on the 24th Feb. As a consequence, there was no mandatory, legal, or moral obligation to attend the appointment with Ingeus on the 25th Feb.Please confirm that this vexatious benefit doubt is rejected and removed from your files at the earliest opportunity.
The DWP may respond with "we will keep this doubt on file for months", but hopefully your friend's response will also be noted.Would suggest he keeps a copy of the letter he sends - I'd also suggest he hands it in to his local (ex)JCP office and get a reciept for it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sanction cannot be applied in respect of a day where no claim was made. He closed his JSA on 24th and has not yet made an ESA claim. So, probably best if he starts his claim from the 26th or later, and as Mr P suggests write to the DWP and keep a copy of all letters sent and received in case there is a problem in the future.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sanction cannot be applied in respect of a day where no claim was made. He closed his JSA on 24th and has not yet made an ESA claim. So, probably best if he starts his claim from the 26th or later, and as Mr P suggests write to the DWP and keep a copy of all letters sent and received in case there is a problem in the future.

 

ok i'll let him know, so he could be sanctioned the moment he makes his ESA claim? :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i'll let him know, so he could be sanctioned the moment he makes his ESA claim? :/

 

I don't think so, no, but it's a slightly unusual situation - that's why it's best to keep a paper trail.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mr friend received a text from the jobcentre saying 'we have received your claim to ESA. we will contact you with a decision. you do not need to contact us.' he wants to know if its possible he will be refused ESA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

mr friend received a text from the jobcentre saying 'we have received your claim to ESA. we will contact you with a decision. you do not need to contact us.' he wants to know if its possible he will be refused ESA?

 

If he has a med cert he should not be refused ESA in the first instance. After a couple of months he will be referred for an Atos medical and that's where the problems could start. But to start with he should be OK.

 

Edit to add - the only exception to this is if the med cert specifies something that the DWP does not recognise as an "incapacity". This isn't usually an issue - things like depression and anxiety are fine. The most common things I used to see on certs that I couldn't accept were "pregnancy" and "bereavement". You haven't mentioned him being bereaved and I'm guessing he's not pregnant.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he has a med cert he should not be refused ESA in the first instance. After a couple of months he will be referred for an Atos medical and that's where the problems could start. But to start with he should be OK.

 

Edit to add - the only exception to this is if the med cert specifies something that the DWP does not recognise as an "incapacity". This isn't usually an issue - things like depression and anxiety are fine. The most common things I used to see on certs that I couldn't accept were "pregnancy" and "bereavement". You haven't mentioned him being bereaved and I'm guessing he's not pregnant.

 

 

yes his claim had a sick note from his doctor with it, he also sent them a P45 he got for closing his JSA claim although im not sure if that was needed :/

 

no he has been bereaved lately and as far as i know he's not pregnant lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

No harm in sending the P45 - it shouldn't be needed to process the claim, but hell, better to send more information than is needed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No harm in sending the P45 - it shouldn't be needed to process the claim, but hell, better to send more information than is needed.

 

thats very true as it evidence the JSA claim has been closed, as the jobcentre have text him does that mean his claim is been processed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure - didn't do that when I worked there. I suspect it means that the claim has been received but not actually processed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure - didn't do that when I worked there. I suspect it means that the claim has been received but not actually processed.

 

i have noticed they seem to send texts quite often now as my friend also got one when he sent a JSA 28 to them last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone tell me if am correct if i was to get a sanction again and i had not had a sanction for 2 year and even that i got my money back would i only get a 4week sanction am speaking about as if i was not keen on the job after a information session plus it was not a must take it and was not a letter saying u must apply for this was a attend information session at ingeus bla bla bla

if u want more info to help u with my question then say but am hoping u understand my questions

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

refusal/failure to apply for, or accept if offered, a suitable job without good reason can result in 13 weeks sanction. is that if the job centre offer u a letter with a job on it to apply for ? and not training course as my adviser sayed they dont sanction u for not taking the job only way i would get sanction as if the job centre offered me a letter with a job on to apply for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

refusal/failure to apply for, or accept if offered, a suitable job without good reason can result in 13 weeks sanction. is that if the job centre offer u a letter with a job on it to apply for ? and not training course as my adviser sayed they dont sanction u for not taking the job only way i would get sanction as if the job centre offered me a letter with a job on to apply for.

 

Yes - if you're "matched" to a job by a JSA adviser then you can be sanctioned if you don't apply. You could also be sanctioned if you don't attend training courses you're referred to by the Jobcentre. If you're on the Work Programme, the Jobcentre won't refer you for courses but your WP provider might.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...