Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CPP - Compensation Claim Form


Azer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

I just received another letter from CPP which included a "Compensation Claim Form".

 

One of the section on this form is "Section B: Why you want to be considered for compensation?".

 

I've had the CCP thing on my Barclays Credit Card since about 2006,

 

I do recall the Barclays staff urging me to take out this policy in order to protect from fraud, identity theft and such,

and they were very insistent that I take it out.

 

What would you recommend to put in this section?

 

Shall I just mention that I was aggressively mis-sold a policy that I did not need? Thanks!

 

P.S. Not sure if this is relevant,

but in December CPP took out another premium for this silly policy of 80 odd pounds from my Credit Card,

 

I immediately got in touch with the Barcalycard who advised I contact CPP directly and ask for cancelation and a refund,

which I promptly did as well as give them a earful about how ridiculous it is to continue to take money from customers for a useless product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I remember correctly, they were going to give you the reason to put in the box within the letter you have received

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the letter does say, under a section titled Why you may be entitled to a refund that:

You may have been given misleading or unclear information when you were sold your card protection, such as: - the policy said it covered you fro up to £100,000 (figure varied over time) worth of unauthorised transactions that occur after you inform CPP that a card was lost or stolen. But you did not need this element of the product's cover because your bank or card issuer was responsible for any transactions after your card had been reported lost or stolen. - the policy said it covered you for up to £5000 (figure varied over time) worth of unauthorised transactions that occur before you inform CPP that a card was lost or stolen.But we did not explain that you would only be liable for unauthorised transactions in limited circumstances, as your bank or card issuer would usually cover you for anything over the first £50 of those transactions. You may also have other concerns with the way your card protection policy was sold to you
Going with the above, I guess maybe I should write something along the lines of:
I want to be considered for compensation because the policy was aggressively mis-sold to me by a Barcalycard/CPP representative who presented misleading and unclear information as a result of which I took on a policy which I did not need as I was already adequately protected by my credit card issuer.
Do you think the above is sufficient?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Azer - just rec'd same package and come accross your thread looking for the answer to the same question.

 

hope caggers in the know might provide some help.

you simply use the wording given in the letter containing the claim form,the cpp policies said exactly what they have stated, so you were given unclear and misleading information when you were sold the policy
  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to be absolutely clear the policy figures in Jan 2005 were £50,000 and £1,000, increasing to £100,000 and £5,000 by 2008, which is why they say "figure varied over time", and dont forget if you bought or renewed prior to 14/01/2005, claim prior to that date from your credit card supplier at the int rate they charged you

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

REF: CPP "Compensation Claim Form".

 

 

What to fill In "Section B: Why you want to be considered for compensation?"

 

 

Keep it short and sweet and straight to the point, simply write:

 

 

1. I didn’t realise the plan was being offered by CPP, a third party

 

 

2. I was not aware you were already covered by the bank’s own anti-fraud policies

 

3. My bank told me it was an essential purchase

 

4. I purchased your policy based on unclear information

 

5. The risks the insurance protects against were overstated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I do recall the Barclays staff urging me to take out this policy in order to protect from fraud, identity theft and such,

and they were very insistent that I take it out.

 

What would you recommend to put in this section?

 

Shall I just mention that I was aggressively mis-sold a policy that I did not need? Thanks!

 

P.S. Not sure if this is relevant,

but in December CPP took out another premium for this silly policy of 80 odd pounds from my Credit Card,

 

I immediately got in touch with the Barcalycard who advised I contact CPP directly and ask for cancelation and a refund,

which I promptly did as well as give them a earful about how ridiculous it is to continue to take money from customers for a useless product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You may have been given misleading or unclear information when you were sold your card protection, such as: - the policy said it covered you fro up to £100,000 (figure varied over time) worth of unauthorised transactions that occur after you inform CPP that a card was lost or stolen. But you did not need this element of the product's cover because your bank or card issuer was responsible for any transactions after your card had been reported lost or stolen. - the policy said it covered you for up to £5000 (figure varied over time) worth of unauthorised transactions that occur before you inform CPP that a card was lost or stolen.But we did not explain that you would only be liable for unauthorised transactions in limited circumstances, as your bank or card issuer would usually cover you for anything over the first £50 of those transactions. -Cheques have started to be sent out, using these reasons as previously explained

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hi,

Newbie here.

I received the CPP forms, but there were accidentally shredded in a clearout.

Is there any way I can get a replacement form?

 

Thanks

phone 08000 83 43 93 mon to fri 8am-9pm or 8am -6pm sat, and request replacement

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just received a cheque yesterday for £60.20 for having CPP for around 2 years on a credit card a long time ago.

I pretty much used the wording in the claim form.

I was misled / not made aware that I was already sufficiently covered under existing banking/credit card regulations.

2 letters, 2 replies sent back, 2 mins of my time and a £60 refund / result.

Thanks to people from CAG and like minded people bringing this out in the open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a cheque yesterday for £60.20 for having CPP for around 2 years on a credit card a long time ago.

I pretty much used the wording in the claim form.

I was misled / not made aware that I was already sufficiently covered under existing banking/credit card regulations.

2 letters, 2 replies sent back, 2 mins of my time and a £60 refund / result.

Thanks to people from CAG and like minded people bringing this out in the open.

 

 

Good stuff...every little helps!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...