Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fredrickson lowell chasing catalogue debt that's not known


LEEPEARL
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3749 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

After successfully challenging and fixing my own debts

I am looking to help a friend of mine who has been constantly harassed by Lowell and now Fredrickson international for a catalogue debt,

 

I just wanted to ask a few questions and hopefully get some guidance.

 

The story is My friend moved home and

 

after a 6 months he started receiving debt letters from Lowell saying he owed x amount to kays/shop direct,

he has never had an account with either of these and suspects someone somehow opened a account with them using details left behind

in letter form at his old address or something similar.

 

He has contacted lowell a few times he has told them and has sent proof that at the time the account was set up he was no longer at that address,

this doesn't seem to have stopped them chasing him

and he like so many others buried his head in the sand and hoped they would give up.

 

They have now passed on his details to Fredrickson who I know are part of lowell and are just as bad

and will probably attempt at some point getting a ccj,

the recent letters state courts and bailiffs and have added fees etc.

 

I've seen these letters a thousand times and I know they're usually computer generated threatograms but my friend wants this resolved.

.. and well I kinda get a kick out of putting lowell and its like to bed.

 

I just wanted to know first off would a catalogue debt need a Credit agreement to have been signed etc?

 

my first port of call would be to CCA lowell/fredrickson and see what they come up with it could be as easy as that.

 

hopefully someone can shed a little light id much appreciate it.

 

Thanks

L

Link to post
Share on other sites

his first port of call is to contact actionfraud.

 

I hope they've checked their credit file?

 

and that nothing else has been taken out in their name too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then why are lowlife chasing him?

 

if the debt is in his name

 

then how come lowlife are chasing him?

 

somethings not right here.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As DX says above, your firend needs to call Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or online at http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/

 

Your friend needs to then send Lowell & Fredrickson's a letter informing them of fraud and also enclosing the Crime reference Number.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or instead of jumping the gun right now, simply send the prove it letter. See what actual proof lowells have in regards to dates etc. Then you can simply look through your paperwork and see if you have a bill or council tax form that shows you werent there at the time.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

He hardly speaks a word of english hence why I am helping him.

 

I know he should have dealt with this earlier on in the process but he had no idea what the letters were until he spoke to me.

 

The letters go back to july 2013 is it not easier just to CCA lowells and ask them to prove the debt is his rather than us having to prove its not?

 

Thanks

L

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or instead of jumping the gun right now, simply send the prove it letter. See what actual proof lowells have in regards to dates etc. Then you can simply look through your paperwork and see if you have a bill or council tax form that shows you weren't there at the time.

 

He said he has already sent lowell a copy of his tenancy agreement stating he wasn't living at the property.

 

They've just passed on his debt to fredrickson, and now I am trying to fix it

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the new house owner used his details and his name to open credit

then when they chased, claimed he had moved

and lowlife traced him...that's fraud!!

 

needs reporting.

 

cant understand why its not on CRA file though.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

freddies are lowlife as you say

if he genuinely never took out any catalogue accounts

 

then what else have they poss done in his name

 

how long ago did he move out

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So he has proof he wasnt there at the time the debts were taken out. Time to tell lowells, throw the debt into deep dispute and get actionfraud involved. Once lowells have the crime number, they would be VERY stupid to continue communication and harass you. They should only be talking to actionfraud and giving you updates.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

He hardly speaks a word of english hence why I am helping him.

 

I know he should have dealt with this earlier on in the process but he had no idea what the letters were until he spoke to me.

 

The letters go back to july 2013 is it not easier just to CCA lowells and ask them to prove the debt is his rather than us having to prove its not?

 

Thanks

L

 

no it needs to be reported as fraud.

 

if his English is not that good

it might be an idea to make sure his old address shows on his cra file

and all his 'known' accounts are showing

 

sometimes people do not realise when they purchase something

esp if English is not their first language what they are actually doing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the info above leepearl. get actionfraud involved, get the crime number, send it to lowells in a letter of complaint and that should be it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO no!

 

that in certain instances could be seen as a sort of ack of the debt.

 

he is disputing the debt is his

because of suspected fraud.

 

get the fraud aspect in or out the window

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just explain to actionfraud that English & its laws are not their strong point.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why an earth would you have to send a copy of the tenancy agreement. Thats one step too far unless of course your friend did it off their own back,

DX is right, contacting Actionfraud is the best thing to do .

Edited by fkofilee

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to actionfraud very helpful, have just got off the phone to lowell/fredrickson they have the ref number now and have no idea what happens next usless.

 

I was on the phone to them today for over an hour asking them questions to test their knowledge about debts etc... They have no idea... AT ALL!/

Stay off the phone to them now and keep on at them in letters too... Its the only way. IF need be contact customer service to chase them via email [email protected]

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy I spoke to at Lowell had no idea what action fraud was or what happens next. He had no info about the account at all.

Lowell/frederickson are an absolute joke.

 

Best to keep off of the telephone and keep everything in writing.

 

Phone monkeys do not care about you and only a commission payment, the guy you spoke to may have logged it on their system but it would be dangerous to take their word for it, Write to them and keep a copy for yourself including proof of posting which is free over a Post Office counter.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...