Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If a DCA supplies a reconstituted copy of the CCA what would be the next step. It seems that a reconstituted copy must be a " true copy " of the executed agreement, it must contain the Prescribed Terms. But given that there is no copy of the applicants signature surely it could be an agreement form with the details filled in. How can it be assumed that this " copy " represents a true copy that the claimant has supposed to have signed. Cabot have demonstrated a bit of sabre rattling when they say "Until we're able to provide this information , your account is unenforceable. This means we're not permitted to obtain a County Court judgement against you . Whilst we cannot pursue legal action, your balance remains outstanding ". I looked up a case... Cabot UK Ltd  v  Bachellier (2010) which might help, but it's tough reading, I'd prefer to plough through War and Peace. This particular case with Cabot is not huge , approx' £140, but the only other worry that I have is also with Cabot...£2100. They may try to make a point with lesser case.        
    • you'll never find a court open on a w/end MB. all courts are closed Good Friday and Bank Holiday Monday. However as Andy points out, that does NOT mean you get 2 extra days to file, you get one, same as xmas/new Year. UKPC have not filed their, so no rush on yours as dave says.  
    • Top US magazine slams Britain after 14 years of Tory ‘psychodrama’ The New Yorker’s excoriating report on the state of the UK lays bare how Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU) “catalysed some of the worst tendencies in British politics”. “The only way to think about it is as a psychodrama enacted, for the most part, by a small group of middle-aged men who went to élite private schools, studied at the University of Oxford, and have been climbing and chucking one another off the ladder of British public life" Top US magazine slams Britain after 14 years of Tory ‘psychodrama’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The New Yorker’s excoriating report on the state of the UK lays bare how Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU) “catalysed...  
    • UK travellers are being caught out by post-Brexit passport rules.   When do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule? WWW.BBC.COM UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.                                   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my phone to these on 07/10/13

 

offered me £58.00 for my Blackberry and then changed it to £18.10 wear and tear.. Utter crap.

 

I have rang, sent letters (recorded) So i think the best thing to do is a CCJ after reading other peoples comments.

 

I know its going cost more than the phone but its the principle.

 

I even logged it with Haringey Council and the online fraud team.

 

I would suggest EVERYONE reports it to be honest so they can be shut down.

 

I dont know how they can let them carry on trading :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right. It is a scandal that so many peple have had their phones stolen and yet the police have done nothing about it.

 

If you issue the claim, I suggest that you name as defendants:-

Yemonia Ltd trading as Cash4phones - 1st defendant

MR NEARCHOS CHACHOLIADES, 2nd defendant

 

He is a director but if he wants to defend, he will have to file a defence with an address for service. If he does, then let us know.

 

Don't bother to send any more letters or threats. Just issue the claim straightaway and then get your judgment as soon as you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that i have access to the C4Phones Holding Company details as well - having just checked they are voluntarily winding the company up as of 10/12/13. MR SAVVAS KOUMOURIS is the named director.

NEARCHOS CHACHOLIADES is Director or Yemonia. £10k of unsettled CCJ's :-( I doubt ill get a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do you see that they are winding up?

 

I don't see it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually - I've found it.

 

What about Yemonia?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The usual suspects, of course

Company Register Information

 

Company Number:07474171

Date of Incorporation:20/12/2010

Company Name:C4P HOLDINGS LIMITED

Registered Office:

UNIT 15 GATEWAY MEWS

RINGWAY

LONDON

N11 2UT

Company Type:Private Limited Company

 

 

Country of Origin:United Kingdom

 

 

Status:Active - Proposal to Strike off

 

 

Nature Of Business (SIC):74990 - Non-trading company

Number of Charges:( 0 outstanding / 0 part satisfied / 0 satisfied)

 

Previous Names

No previous name information has been recorded over the last 20 years.

 

Key Filing Dates

 

 

Accounting Reference Date:31/12

 

 

Last Accounts Made Up To:31/12/2011 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

 

 

Next Accounts Due:30/09/2013OVERDUE

 

 

Last Return Made Up To:14/08/2013

 

 

Next Return Due:11/09/2014

 

 

Last members list:14/08/2013

 

 

Last Bulk Shareholders List:Not available

 

Current Appointments

 

Number of current appointments: 1

 

DIRECTOR:KOUMOURIS, SAVVAS MR

 

 

Appointed:12/08/2013

Date of Birth: 31/08/1983

Nationality:CYPRIOT

 

 

No. of Appointments:2

 

Address:UNIT 15 GATEWAY MEWS

RINGWAY

LONDON

N11 2UT

 

Country/State of Residence:CYPRUS

 

 

 

This Report excludes resignations

Recent Filing History

Documents filed since 14/09/2012

 

DATE

FORM

DESCRIPTION

17/09/2013

GAZ1(A)

FIRST GAZETTE NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY STRIKE-OFF

04/09/2013

DS01

APPLICATION FOR STRIKING-OFF

14/08/2013

AR01

14/08/13 FULL LIST

14/08/2013

LATEST SOC

14/08/13 STATEMENT OF CAPITAL;GBP 1

14/08/2013

TM01

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR DANIEL CHRISOSTOMOU

14/08/2013

AP01

DIRECTOR APPOINTED MR SAVVAS KOUMOURIS 14/08/2013

TM02

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, SECRETARY CHRISTOPHER GEORGIOU 31/05/2013

AP01

DIRECTOR APPOINTED MR DANIEL CHRISOSTOMOU 31/05/2013

TM01

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR PHILIP HENCHOZ 15/01/2013

AR01

13/01/13 FULL LIST

14/09/2012

AA

31/12/11 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL

 

This Report excludes 88(2) Share Allotment documents

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you do as i am and make a small claim through the courts and you can add the costs to it. They are trading under different names Yemonia is another name, C4P Holdings is another

 

Look at all the other CCJ's they have. You wont get your money. If they have formed another company, then you would have to issue a CCJ on that company or the director.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ompany Details

 

spacer.gif

print.gif help_button.gif

 

Name & Registered Office:

YEMONIA LIMITED

SUITE 21 5 SPRING STREET

PADDINGTON

LONDON

UNITED KINGDOM

W2 3AQ

Company No. 06300042

 

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif Status: Active

Date of Incorporation: 03/07/2007

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC):

46520 - Wholesale of electronic and telecommunications equipment and parts

Accounting Reference Date: 30/04

Last Accounts Made Up To: 30/04/2012 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

Next Accounts Due: 31/01/2014

Last Return Made Up To: 14/08/2013

Next Return Due: 11/09/2014

Mortgage: Number of charges: ( 0 outstanding / 0 satisfied / 0 part satisfied )

Last Members List: 14/08/2013

Previous Names: Date of changePrevious Name06/12/2013C4P TRADING LIMITED17/03/2010SMOKIN CRUSIES LIMITED

Link to post
Share on other sites

Classic rip off merchant who is a petty thief. Seems he/she is from Cyprus and trading in OUR Capital City. I may be wrong but they seem to have an address which they are "trading" from. Probably ripping people off as peoples posts say. Often, it seems, the offer for the phone is a dangled carrot but once they get it the offer is reduced significantly due to "wear and tare" being the reason despite the phone being in great condition.

Ive heard of people sening almost unused iphones to these idiots and getting offered £200 and receiving nothing money-wise. Research it and you will see what I mean. All on google. "cash4phones" but the website is down.... wonder why!

SAVVAS KOUMOURIS is apparently the company director who is changing the company name/details/accounts so they can continually [problem] people.

I bet you the CCJ's mentioned by someone above are never paid.

Law loophole? Change the company name and details when you get caught out as a thief? Food for thought people!

Finally. It is WRONG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...