Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
    • The retailer has come under fire for an advert showing motorcyclists wearing trainers and doing wheelies.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cash4Phones - got CCJ against them..should i use bailiffs to enforce it...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Strange, my system has no mention of a name change at present.

 

I do note that C4P HOLDINGS LIMITED (Company Number 07474171) is being dissolved and appears to be linked.

 

Their address is:

 

Unit 15 Gateway Mews

Ringway

London

N11 2UT

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have changed legal address and directors again.

 

@admin, can i post director, name, dob and registred address?I have posession of them. Also name of main shareholder (owner).

 

Full new company details:

 

Yemonia Limited

Reg number: 06300042

 

Suite 21, 5 Spring Street

Paddington, London

W2 3AQ

 

Directors have changed 16 times since march 2010 and they have changed there trading address 4 times, and 2 name changes (previously Smokin Cruises Limited, c4p Trading Limited).

 

Old addresses:

 

till 09/03/2013: 2nd Floor, 43 Broomfield Road, Chelmsford

till 11/01/2011: 4 Broadgate, London, EC2M 2QS

till 21/10/2011: 30 Crown Place, London, EC2A

till 06/12/2013: Unit 15, Gateway Mews, London, N11 2UT

current: Suite 21, 5 Spring Street, Paddington, London, W2 3AQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need it against the CEo really. THe company simply ceases trading, the guy runs off and creates another company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant file it against yemonia. You were dealing with the previous company. Thats why people are trying to get the directors personal info so they can serve documents on him instead.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant file it against yemonia. You were dealing with the previous company. Thats why people are trying to get the directors personal info so they can serve documents on him instead.

 

I wonder if that is why the directors change from one day to the next?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant file it against yemonia. You were dealing with the previous company. Thats why people are trying to get the directors personal info so they can serve documents on him instead.

 

You need to be very careful about who you claim against and make sure it is the right entity. You can't just claim against the Director/CEO as he wasn't liable.

 

You could end up with costs against you for an invalid claim, even if it is in the small claims track.

 

If you have issued against a trading name then the case could well be struck out and is likely to be unenforceable.

 

People really should do their homework before embarking on legal claims. And renegadeimp should know better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant file it against yemonia. You were dealing with the previous company. Thats why people are trying to get the directors personal info so they can serve documents on him instead.

 

There is no previous company. It is just a name change. It is the same company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be very careful about who you claim against and make sure it is the right entity. You can't just claim against the Director/CEO as he wasn't liable.

 

You could end up with costs against you for an invalid claim, even if it is in the small claims track.

 

If you have issued against a trading name then the case could well be struck out and is likely to be unenforceable.

 

People really should do their homework before embarking on legal claims. And renegadeimp should know better!

 

I disagree with this. There is sufficient evidence of wrongdoing - to pierce the corporate veil.

 

People should think about issuing a claim against Yemonia, the trading name and against the directors personally.

 

However the only address for the directors seems to be outside the jurisdiction.

 

However I expect that a court would be quite happy to consider that the papers are well served against the directors at their registered address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with this. There is sufficient evidence of wrongdoing - to pierce the corporate veil.

 

People should think about issuing a claim against Yemonia, the trading name and against the directors personally.

 

However the only address for the directors seems to be outside the jurisdiction.

 

However I expect that a court would be quite happy to consider that the papers are well served against the directors at their registered address.

 

As it is the same company number (name change only) I agree with that point and the addition of the company name can often be done by way of an N244 application to the issuing court. It may be prudent to include the company number in brackets - Yemonia Ltd (Co. No 123456) t/a cash4phones.

 

However there is no right to add the Directors name personally. The company is 'Limited Liability' for hat very reason. Issuing against the Directors too is an abuse of process. You could never enforce against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact I am probably using the wrong term - piercing the corporate veil - but anyway, I would name the director personally on the claim as a second defendant.

 

It is up to him if he wants to defend. If he does, then he can come to court - which will beinteresting. If he doesn't then you can start to stack up judgments against him as well - because so far, he is squeaky clean

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the directors want to break cover then I am sure that we can arrange a welcome for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The same thing thing has happened to me sent my HTC one x off in early November it passed all of its tests and I was told I would be paid within 5 days 3 weeks later it was still saying payment pending now I find that the company has changed it's name and can't be reached. I've found out the company directors name and I use that term loosely I prefer [edited]****** and if you Google it it not only comes up with his [edited] face on facebook but it also facts about his business dealings so here it is Nearchos chacholiades you are an [edited] happy hunting folks hope it helps !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi henrycat.

Apologies for 'modifying' your post. We have to be careful what appears online.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...