Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M&S loan letter from Moorcroft


mostlygrumpy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3694 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wait and see what Moorcroft send.

 

How old is the debt, when was the last payment made?

 

It would be a good idea to check your credit reference files.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this always been a credit card or was it a storecard that was converted to a credit card .

 

If so did you sign anything, get an agreement?

 

Depending on the answers to the Brigs questions you could send a CCA request .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this always been a credit card or was it a storecard that was converted to a credit card .

 

If so did you sign anything, get an agreement?

 

Depending on the answers to the Brigs questions you could send a CCA request .

 

It's a loan not credit card. Last payment made to it was 2 months ago. Should I wait until Moorcroft write to me or send a cca request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Ok . I would wait until you get a letter from moorcrap. I assume the loan was taken out after April 2007 ?

 

Either way once you have something from moorcrap send a S77 request.

 

Have you received a default notice?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Ok . I would wait until you get a letter from moorcrap. I assume the loan was taken out after April 2007 ?

 

Either way once you have something from moorcrap send a S77 request.

 

Have you received a default notice?

 

I think loan was originally taken prior to April 2007. Does that make a difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked credit reference files, with Moorcroft involved it would be a wise move (for reasons I can't go into here).

 

Pre April 2007 the original agreement or a proper copy will be needed to enforce the debt,

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Send off the CCA request

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974

 

If Moorcroft are acting as agents then send it to M&S but let moorcroft know you have sent them the CCA request.

You could send it to moorcroft but they may return it to you and tell you to send it to M&S

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Cca letter to M&S on 6th by recorded delivery. They have cashed £1 cheque on 9th dec. what letter do I send as no reply from them within 12+2. Emailed Moorcroft and told them I'm in dispute. They've written back saying they're going to speak to M&S and take no action in the meantime

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from M&S today recoded delivery. There are 4 sheets.

Sheet 1. Covering letter saying sheets 2,3&4 comply with cca

Sheet 2 - a reconstituted copy of application/agreement form. This is blank where my signature should be. Also loan was from spring 2004 however address on reconstituted copy is one I did not move to until end 2009. Also there is no agreement date or term in months or interest rate just an interest amount, monthly instalments are stated as £0.00

Sheet 3 - standard copy of terms and conditions

Sheet 4 - statement of transactions

 

To my untrained eye the reconstituted agreement is not satisfactory as it has wrong address, no interest rate, monthly oayment of £0.00 and does not bear my signature. Also agreement date is blank as is date below scanned M&S official signature.

 

Your advice re reply would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to comply letter

in the green library tab up top

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?405830-Letter-for-a-Failed-CCA-Request

 

Just two points . You need to change the S78(6) to S77(4)

 

 

The other point is that it states they should have sent a full statement of account which isn't strictly true. I would edit the letter slightly as you have received documents they just didn't comply

 

Dear Sirs

 

ACCOUNT NO: XXXXXX

 

Your attention is drawn to the fact that this account is subject to a serious dispute. On XX/XX/XX, I requested that [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] supply me a copy of the credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 77. To date [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] have failed to comply with my request. Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] , nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

In line with recent OFT Guidance surrounding Unenforceability, I presume you're aware that the OFT has stipulated the following;

Sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 outline the information creditors must provide to debtors under fixed-term, running account & Hire Agreements. Under these sections a debtor can pay £1 to get:

a copy of their agreement

copies of some of the other documents mentioned in their agreement

a statement of account.

If this information is not provided within 12 working days the debt becomes unenforceable. This means a creditor cannot:

make the debtor pay the debt before they're supposed to

get a court judgment against the debtor

As this account is clearly unenforceable, I expect you to write back and confirm that no further action will be taken and that the account is now closed and no further correspondence will take place. I require that you clarify your position on this point as failure to do so, even by omission or lack of a response, will be regarded as an attempt to deliberately misrepresent or conceal the legal position regarding this matter to which an appropriate complaint will be made to the OFT.

Consequently, any legal action you pursue will not only be fully and vigorously defended, it will also be averred as both unlawful and vexatious. As such I respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the original creditor for immediate resolution prior to my seeking legal advice; due to the fact you cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities as the account was already in dispute at the time you became involved.

Yours faithfully,

 

*

Sign using a computer font

 

That is an alternative

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to comply letter

in the green library tab up top

 

dx

 

They have today sent the details as described in the longer post above. The failure to comply letter seems to be for non receipt of the forms. How do I dispute the wrong address please? Also the loan was taken in Spring 2004 do they have to supply me with a form bearing my signature because if when the facility was in 2004? As always thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?405830-Letter-for-a-Failed-CCA-Request

 

Just two points . You need to change the S78(6) to S77(4)

 

 

The other point is that it states they should have sent a full statement of account which isn't strictly true. I would edit the letter slightly as you have received documents they just didn't comply

 

 

 

That is an alternative

 

Do I say it does not comply as the address is incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not tell them what is wrong , just that they have not complied with the CCA request . You could if you want say something like , I would refer you to Carey v HSBC Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) (23 December 2009) where HHJ Waksman detailed what was required.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not tell them what is wrong , just that they have not complied with the CCA request . You could if you want say something like , I would refer you to Carey v HSBC Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) (23 December 2009) where HHJ Waksman detailed what was required.

Thank you. I assume it is ok to alter the letter slightly to reflect it is to M&S themselves not Moorcroft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should add , they do not need to supply a signature on a CCA request but it should be a TRUE copy of what you WOULD have signed. As the address is wrong it clearly isn't..but why tell them that?

 

As for actual enforcement they will probably need to supply a copy of the original agreement. I think they are pretty stuffed

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...