Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Travelodge claim for alleged damage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, new to this place but I gather others have experienced this problem and received good advice.

 

I stayed in a Travelodge recently with my two children. Unfortunately in the morning before we checked out one of the children was sick in the room - a small patch on the carpet, on the duvet and on the mattress. The duvet did not have a cover because, despite requesting one repeatedly, it was not provided. I cleaned up as best as I could and the front desk was informed.

 

I have received a letter from Civil Recovery Solutions demanding payment of nearly £300 for, among other things, damage caused during my stay, loss of use of the room etc. I have had no previous contact from Travelodge concerning the matter. The letter states that I have broken IMPLIED terms and conditions.

 

I have requested from Travelodge a breakdown of the costs incurred as well as proof of the consequential loss as the room was unable to be re-let. CRS have stated I should liaise with them not TL.

 

I wondered if anyone can add anything to help me out? Many thanks if so!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

We have a forum dedicated to this type of claim. As this hasn't gone to court as I understand it, I'll move your thread to the other forum and leave you a short term redirect from this one.

 

It's very likely that you don't have a problem, but the forum guys will tell you. :)

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£300? WHo are they kidding. DEMAND a full breakdown of how they came to that figure. I bet travelodge havent claimed that, but the silly CRS have after adding on their own "costs".

 

It wouldnt cost travelodge anything as it would be part of the general cleaning routine. Throw duvet and sheets in washer, shampoo carpet and mattress.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair removing half cleaned vomit will not be part of the general cleaning routine. I imagine it would have to be cleaned very specifically in order to remove the smell if nothing else.

 

You should indeed ask for a breakdown of the costs claimed but I don't think you should be jumping up and down in outrage about this; you left vomit in the room after all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does NOT cost 300 to clean a mattress and a carpet. My father is a self employed upholstery cleaner, with FULL professional equipment. He, and others like him, charge around 80 a full room, including all mattresses and carpets.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...