Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Sold Car finance from Ford Credit - Link got ROGO - repo'd by fake bailiffs - anglia recovery.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies in advance for the long post, but I hope someone can advise me on this matter ASAP.

I bought a car on hire purchase in 2009 from Ford Credit.

Since becoming unemployed in early 2012, I have not been able to make regular payments on it.

The debt was, at some point, sold on to a company named LINK Financial who, in June 2013, made a claim in the county court.

I went for that hearing and explained my circumstances to the judge who gave me a grace period of three months during which I was to make payments of £50 pm, and then have the case reviewed.

Unfortunately, the HMRC stopped my tax credits in July and I was unable to make the £50 pm payments;

I had formally informed Link Financial regarding this fact.

In Sept 2013, the case was reviewed in my absence, since the notice was sent to my old address, and a default judgement was entered against me.

I am now planning to request that the judgement be set aside since my professional and personal circumstances have changed since 1st of october, and i am now able to make regular payments.

My question:

How good are my chances of having this judgement set aside and getting an opportunity to have a hearing where I can explain things to the judge?

I am under a lot of stress due to this finance company constantly harassing me with phone calls and letters, despite the fact that I have paid off more than fifty per cent of the debt.

Edit: Do I need to enter a draft along with this application?

Thank you for any replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The reasons I have given are:

 

1. I was absent during the hearing.

2. I did not get a chance to defend myself, as a result.

3. The notice was sent to my old address.

 

I have also given a few more reasons which relate to more personal matters which were discussed with the judge at the initial hearing in June, 2013.

 

On that occasion,

the reps from Link did not turn up,

and the judge was decent enough to listen to the full extent of the financial quandry I was pushed into due to various factors.

 

This loan was originally with Ford Credit and nowhere in their agreement do they mention Link FInancial, Ltd.

 

IS it legal for them to sell the debt to Link?

 

Am I still liable for the debt?

 

Also, more than fifty per cent of the original amount has been paid off.

 

WOuld this help me in any way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reasons I have given are:

 

1. I was absent during the hearing.

2. I did not get a chance to defend myself, as a result.

3. The notice was sent to my old address.

 

I have also given a few more reasons which relate to more personal matters which were discussed with the judge at the initial hearing in June, 2013. On that occasion, the reps from Link did not turn up, and the judge was decent enough to listen to the full extent of the financial quandry I was pushed into due to various factors.

 

 

This loan was originally with Ford Credit and nowhere in their agreement do they mention Link FInancial, Ltd. IS it legal for them to sell the debt to Link? Am I still liable for the debt? Yes and yes Its been Assigned but did you ever receive a Notice of Assignment from either the OC or the Assigee?

Also, more than fifty per cent of the original amount has been paid off. WOuld this help me in any way?

If its an HP agreement it would if they tried to recover the car but not with the debt

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I did not inform them

Well, they are trying very hard to recover the car.

And they're naturally going to slap the outstanding amount on me minus the selling price at auction.

Thank you for clearing that up.

Following submission of the N244 form, the court has decided to hold another hearing.

I was wondering if you could give me any advice regarding the defence that I can put up?

Any help or key points that I can use would be really appreciated!

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If you could roughly draft your points that you would consider would add to a defence then we can smooth it off with a few tweaks.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"1. I have been unable to make the monthly payments of £50 as agreed at the last hearing due to the fact that the HMRC suddenly, and unexpectedly, reduced my tax credits by a substantial amount in June 2013. I had informed Link Financial, Ltd regarding this matter.

2. I have been unable to make the monthly payments of £50 as agreed at the last hearing due to the fact that the HMRC suddenly, and unexpectedly, reduced my tax credits by a substantial amount in June 2013. I had informed Link Financial, Ltd regarding this matter.

3. I had not received the notification from the court regarding the hearing on the 11th of September, 2013 due to the fact that it had been sent to my previous address. Also, I did not receive any notice from the claimant regarding this hearing.

4. With reference to my evidence given at the last hearing, I state that my circumstances have changed since the 1st of October, 2013 both on the personal as well as professional front.

5. My visa application for extension of leave to remain has finally been accepted by the UKBA; therefore, I am now able to work full time without restrictions. The primary reason for my unemployment has been the delay in processing my application with the UKBA.

6. The HMRC have reinstated the tax credit payments to the correct amount since October 2013.

7. With reference to evidence that I had submitted verbally at the previous hearing, I wish to inform the court that I now have a baby who is one month old. The removal of my car would put a severe strain on my family in terms of transport since my wife is asthmatic, and had undergone a slightly complicated delivery. Also, my son goes to school which is more than a walkable distance away from our residence.

8. I do not have access to any other vehicle and we do not have any relatives or family in Carlisle who can help us if the need arises.

9. I ask the court to allow me to make monthly payments of £50 towards this debt, as well as payment of the arrears which may be due since June 2013.

10. I have also been advised that this loan agreement had been with Ford Credit and not with Link Financial Ltd. Also, I have paid off more than 50% of the outstanding amount.

11. I request the court to kindly consider the fact that I am willing and able to make regular payments towards this debt, as well the fact that removal of the car from my possession will leave me and my family in an extremely difficult situation.

12. I will be able to submit a summary of my expenses and budget if this is required."

I am planning to take along the following documents to submit if needed:

1. Original hire purchase agreement with Fod Credit.

2. Budget sheet showing my monthly income and expenses.

3. My wife's payslip (not sure if this is needed; please advice. I'm not keen on dragging her into the picture, tbh.)

Sorry for the delay in posting this, but I would really appreciate any feedback on this.

Thank You,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

What happened to the set a side ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't remember.

 

I have had a lot happen since that old post.

 

But now out of the blue, they have sent me this statement.

 

Come 2018, the account will be six years old since the last payment,

 

so Im guessing they are planning to reactivate collection etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well getting a statement is useful.....but you can forget the 6 year rule...if your thinking its statute barred.....not applicable to CCJs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually made any payments since the judgment ? What date was the judgment ? Has the judgment creditor tried to execute the judgment since it was granted ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have not made any payments since the car was taken away.

 

Before that I had made sporadic payments which were lower than the required monthly amount.

 

I just ran a credit report on NODDLE and it doesn't detail a CCJ at all against me. :-|

 

Normally this would make me happy but I don't understand....

 

The creditor had tried contacting me on several occasions via telephone, and would send a yearly account statement.

 

I have not responded to their calls or post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the date of judgment ...not when the car was taken...but as you have stated you have made sporadic payments

 

Have you checked ....

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not because it's a paid site. Is it any different than the info given on NODDLE?

 

Yes its the CCJ registry were all judgment are recorded.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

(Sorry to have trailed off, but LIfe just takes over)

 

SInce the last post, I have found out that the CCJ was not from Link but from another "creditor", a private school admission thing from many years ago. (Thanks to Trustonline)

 

I now have £3533 outstanding on my Link debt, and the account defaulted in deecmber 2012.

 

Since it will be 6 years in december 2018, I am wondering whether I should contact them to try and partially settle

(at around £700 or so, since they have taken possession of the car sometime after March 2014)

 

the debt or wait and see whether LINK will go to court with it.

 

Also, would a CCA request be relevant in this case, as the debt was originally with FOrd Credit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so there is no CCJ and you cant remember what happened in court...

but you did goto court thought?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to court back in 2012 or 2013,

the car was taken from me sometime after march 2014 (i cant recall).

 

But the only ccj showing against my name on trustonline website is the one in relation to the private school payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

had you paid more than 1/3rd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah nov 2013 you said:

Also, more than fifty per cent of the original amount has been paid off.

 

so how did they get the car?

explain what happened?

did you agree to it and signed anything and hand over the keys?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again,

 

I am not sure if more than half or more than 1/3rd has been paid off,

but I think I should be able to get this info from the account details on my noddle account?

 

They kept making phone calls,

threatened to send debt collectors to the door, etc.

 

One morning, this thuggish looking guy knocked on the door and said he has the right to enter the premises and take whatever is needed, etc.

I denied him entry and advised him I would ring the police,

at which point he said I can hand over the keys to the car and all will be settled later by the company.

 

I was at home with my children at the time,

and under the stress of the situation,

I dont think I recall being given any paperwork.

 

I handed over the keys, and the paperwork to the car and he drove off.

 

Link financial went totally quiet after that for a long time till they started again with their yearly statement.

 

Edit: I've attched a screenshot

Link.jpg

Edited by bitemarx
Attacing a screenshot
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh dear you got had then.

 

and that's why ford finance sold it on to Link.

 

sar to ford credit time

 

lets get the truth of what happened..

 

in the meantime

NO phone calls

 

and simply post here if Plink send anything more

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...