Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAR template for mortage details, please?


JibTeenuc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I'm hoping someone can offer a little help and advice.

 

I wish to serve a SAR on the bank that previously held my mortgages (I had two linked to the same property, due to undergoing a - relatively amicable - divorce and being obliged to buy my spouse's interest in the house - who had no desire for the property...just the cash). :violin:

 

I've lost all of the documentation, pertaining to said mortgages. :oops:

 

I would like copies of the original offer and subsequent agreement along with all terms and conditions (including those if/as and when they may have been amended). Additionally, I want the bank to provide a full list of mortgage repayments made by me and received by them along with details/notes of any and all communications between our parties, howsoever conducted (written, telephone, carrier-pigeon etc.,) as well as any manual notes and/or interventions which may have occurred with regard to my account, throughout the term of the mortgage.

 

Does such a SAR template already exist or is there any member of the forum who may help me to properly draft a suitable Subject Access Request?

 

I'd be extremely grateful for any help/advice/referrals.

 

Many thanks.

 

Jib T :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just send them a standard SAR...template is in the CAG library.

 

You can amend the template to request the specific items you want if you wish to highlight them.

 

Thanks for that (so quickly, too :-)).

 

My question was probably not very well drafted in that not much written correspondence actually passed between us,

 

I seem to recall (no reason to, I guess, as the agreement was in place and the terms of repayment being adhered to by yours truly)

but, in the few months immediately prior to my paying off the mortgages it appears that I may have been provided with misinformation.

 

This would probably have been in the form of telephone conversations held between us (some of my and some of their initiation).

 

do I need to ask for and itemise everything I want or can I someway ask for everything, by way of communication,

which was exchanged between us (INCLUDING the kitchen sink, where such was the case)

as I don't want to afford them an opportunity to not provide something of import, purely because it was not specifically requested.

 

Thanks again for your advice, which is sincerely appreciated.

 

Jib T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so you can still take the standard template and amend it.

 

You can bullet point all of the information you specifically want within the SAR for example

 

  • Communications logs including transcripts of all telephone calls
  • Coipies of all statements of account
  • Copies of all and any agreements
     

 

 

You can then end the SAR with a paragraph along the lines of "For the avoidance of doubt, this is not an exhaustive list and I require ALL data you hold on me".

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the phone conversations wre not directly related to arrears

then they might not have them

 

there should certainly be notes in the comms log though

or whatever they call it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the phone conversations wre not directly related to arrears

then they might not have them

 

there should certainly be notes in the comms log though

or whatever they call it.

 

dx

 

Thanks for the info.

 

Calls were not related to arrears, more to seeking advice on a way forward in order to avoid possible future arrears.

 

Hopefully they will show up on the general call logs.

 

Thanks, again.

 

Jib T.

Edited by JibTeenuc
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hello,

 

 

Any advice gratefully received.

 

 

I have never used an image host (can't even think of the name of a provider), but now I could use one.

 

 

Please can anyone recommend a (free & easy) service, if such a beast exists?

 

 

Oh yeah...... I'd like it to be able to handle both jpg AND pdf formatted data, if possible.

 

 

 

Thanks:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why to post stuff here?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

google drive, photobucket

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photobucket can be hacked!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photobucket can be hacked!

 

 

The reason I ask is that I was hoping someone could take a look at the wording of my proposed SAR - especially as I have already made more than one error whilst trying to seek PPI redress, on behalf of a friend, purely through my own ignorance.

 

 

I just don't want my weapon to go off until it is fully locked and loaded......... (again)!!

 

 

On the SAR advice page, it is stated:

 

 

"PLEASE NOTE - template letters from our librarylink3.gif should not be reproduced on the open forums. If you would like to let people know the wording of your letters simply link to the Letter in question."

 

 

As a result, I concluded that this means "link" to a copy of the document hosted on-line, somewhere.

 

 

If, as I am now beginning to suspect, I have misinterpreted what is stated, I would be really grateful if someone would be kind enough to advise me.

 

 

I certainly do not wish to inadvertently compromise either CAG's security or my own, through inviting the attentions of a hacker.

 

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who might be able to assist me.

 

 

Jib :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We dont need to see our own templates

We know what they say

 

Read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you cant

we do not want things done outside of the open forum

cant see why you have an issue mind..

 

10'000's have posted their PPI stuff here

we don't need to see our own template anyway...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I don't "have an issue" (that I am aware of, leastways).

 

As stated earlier, I simply thought someone could check MY particular SAR drafted upon the very helpful guide provided but customised for purpose (as we are recommended to do, within the SAR sub-section of the Forum.

 

It is of no matter, however, as you have clearly made it aware you have no interest in affording your greater experience in these matters, in checking the document, as I had hoped might have been the case. Accordingly, the SAR has been sent, already.

 

Nonetheless, I am very grateful for the help and advice you have thus far extended. It has proven to be both extremely valuable and initially welcoming, which is sincerely appreciated.

 

Thanks again for the great advice you have kindly shared with me on both my and my friend's behalf and I hope you may be inclined to continue to do so, if and when I am unsure of what to do for the best.

 

As I have said, at an earlier stage and elsewhere, "I am learning".

 

Hopefully this will result in me being less of a nuisance to you and the Forum in general, in the future.

 

Best regards.

 

 

Jib:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the wording of the SAR doesnt need to be so precise now the new rules have come in for the GDPR. Many organisations have made it easier for people to contact them by providing their own templates on their web sites.

 

 

Thank you, that's comforting to learn.:-D

 

 

Anyway, the SAR has gone off now.

 

 

Simply a matter of how to interpret what (if anything) they send us, as a result.

 

 

But at least the first step has been taken. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...