Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The Bank of Scotland Lied in court.


guilain20
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Would anyone be kind enough to give me some advice.

 

My husband had recently been seriously ill.

 

I tried to keep up with the mortgage payments but found it very difficult.

 

My husband is a very proud man and would not let me ask for any help from the government.

 

When he was recovered he accepted a very good job abroad and I was left to sort out the arrears with the bank.

 

They insisted on taking us to court.

 

The Judge said pay the usual amount and £200 a month extra.

 

I paid £712 on the date that was arranged and again the second month.

 

A week into the second month I received a letter saying they were going to repossess.

But I paid it I have the receipts.

 

I studied the paperwork and realised that the amount of the loan in March 13 had been £92,000

then another paper said the amount of the loan in March 13 had been £106,000

I could not believe it the bank had capitalised the arrears the month before the court hearing

and told the judge that the £106,000 + the arrears was the amount owed.

 

Really it was £92,000 + arrears.

 

Correct me if I have got it wrong but once the arrears had been capitalised and the mortgage payment had been raised then at that point there were no arrears??

 

I asked the bank of scotlands solicitors “Shoosmiths” and they said oh yes we've had that complaint before you are paying twice.

You will have to ask the bank about that.

 

The Bank of Scotland Capitalised the arrears in March without telling me.

 

My husband started his job in June 13 so payments started in June so does that mean the arrears were actually for April/May

 

£1024 I could pay that off in a few months.

 

What right do they have to repossess even though I paid what the court said and what right do they have to lie to the court.

 

The banks are disgusting and the courts are allowing them to get away with it.

 

I have to try and stop this repossession but the bank would not even speak to me they referred me to Shoosmiths.

 

Would anyone be kind enough to point me in the right direction because I am doing everything by the book and the big bullies are winning.

 

Kind Regards

Guilain

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to deal with Shoosmiths as they are now involved. I have asked someone to look in on you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should write to the bank (copy Shoosmiths) by special delivery detailing exactly what you have said above and telling them you will vigorously defend any court action for possession.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why the Banks have such power. Why are they bailed out even with such obvious and deliberate disregard for the rules? Why do the Courts back them up no matter what and then use the same rules to ruin hard working law abiding people. It is wrong and so frustrating.

 

 

As a simple person I honestly believed that if you told a court the truth and gave evidence to prove the truth then justice would prevail. How wrong am I. From my recent experience with courts, the Judge has barely (if at all) read through the evidence and has made up his mind before you open your mouth.

 

 

Do the Banks dictate the law? Are British Judges there for justice or just for show?. If a Judge is presented with evidence and he chooses to ignore it then he should be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice.

 

Too many people in positions of power are getting away with making the wrong Judgements. A Judge is not challenged, a politician can always say sorry and pay money back because they did not realise their genuine mistake.

 

They get away with treating us like idiots because we allow them to. I for one am sick of seeing such injustice. I would be more than willing to change things (big Job) any ideas ??

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have had dealings with this shower and their solicitors Shoesmiths/Cobbetts and Irwin Mitchell et al. In our case they said we had gone to the bank to sign an agreement when we were away from home at the time.

They produced a document in support that was for the wrong amount. CCA agreement £25k max ! they where claiming at different amounts depending on which day of the week £61k £40 k £31.

The judge at my application hearing didn't even censure them but let them go away to try again. Luckily for us they got cold feet and discontinued .Perverting the course of justice is still a crime even for them I hope I may have been able to shaft the b888888tds

but by that time I had enough of the stress/ heart problems so agreed to discontinue. My advice is don't trust any of them! just because they have a LLB does not make them honest and that includes the ***********.

The good news is we did get a refund on charges to pay off our overdraft before this fiasco. I still have most of the bumf and my pleadings which I can post if somebody tells me how to do it. Details blanked out of course. I would be more than pleased to stand as a witness against them. Best of luck with your case, I know how stressful it is dealing with these legalised th***********.

Regards Pavi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...