Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Old RBS mint Credit Card Debt & Charges


roxet1986
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Unfortunately having to return for more help.

 

I have been sent a letter from a DCA in regards to and old credit card.

 

I had genuinely forgotten about this as last year when i was facing my debt

the original creditor could not find any information about it and it got ignored.

It now appears to have been passed to the DCA

 

So,

 

My question is this,

 

Before i arrange to pay this debt am I able to challenge the charges that were originally applied, and the corresponding interest?

 

I'm a little short on details at the moment, apologies, but the card was issued in 2008

and defaulted in 2009. limit was 850 and the balance is now approaching 1100.

 

As i mentioned i'm not trying to avoid this debt rather make sure I'm not paying over the odds.

 

Any help/advise wold be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a letter of assmant from your O/C when it was sold to DCA.

You should also ask for proof of debt IE a CCA before you make any payment and a balance

so the DCA does not add more on

 

you need to know what the debt is made up of there could be lots of unlawful charges add on which makes the debt unenforsable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this debt showing on your CRA file?

 

who is the original creditor?

 

have you sent the DCA a CCA request?

 

DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS

they have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

anyone can send out speculative letters claiming you owe this or that

 

you need to gather FACTS before you even mildly think about paying a DCA

on a debt you know SO little about.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this debt showing on your CRA file?

 

who is the original creditor?

 

have you sent the DCA a CCA request?

 

DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS

they have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

anyone can send out speculative letters claiming you owe this or that

 

you need to gather FACTS before you even mildly think about paying a DCA

on a debt you know SO little about.

 

dx

 

 

Thanks for the speedy replies!

 

It was from MINT and yes it does show on CRA file as a default.

 

Ok so do the CCA request as first port of call,If that all shows as above board how would i approach the charges etc?

 

 

Thanks again,

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to send a SAR to the OC to find what charges have been added on,or if you have all your statements you can look at them . There are letters on this site in the library for SAR and letters you can send for charges but if you beds more help just post on here and someone will advise you in what to do. By the way is there any ppi on this card or loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the defaulted date on the cra file summary

and who is show as the owner of the debt please

 

this is the CCa request.

 

adapt the following text to YOUR details.

.

DO NOT SIGN THE LETTER!

.

get a £1 BLANK Postal order

.

write on the back.

for statutory £1 CCA FEE ONLY.

NOT FOR ACCOUNT PAYMENT

.

leave the payee BLANK

.

post the two off by 1st class post, get proof of posting from PO counter - ITS FREE!!

.

they have 12+2 WORKING days to comply.

.

.

firm demanding money

 

street,

 

town,

 

county

 

postcode

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

 

Account/Reference Number 12345678

 

I do not acknowledge any debt with your Company or Associates

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.[77/78/79]

[***DELETE AS NECESSARY FOR YOUR TYPE OF ACCOUNT***

77/78 - everything bar HP agreemwnts, 79 for HP]

of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account,

together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide,

including a detailed statement of the account.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit.

You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment,

and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor.

In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189.

If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement,

you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee.

Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request,

you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity,

and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Mr A N Other [PC print yourname - do NOT sign it!]

 

 

...............

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...

 

Just had to ring CRA and update my address to get hold of my free report.

 

The last one I had contained this debt and the current one does not??

 

Although helpful the operators accent was hard to follow and i think he mentioned it will take time to update with all the info so think I will give it 24hrs and run it again.

 

from the previous report, approx 10 months ago, was listed as RBS Cards (MINT) and the default date was 09/2009.

 

I'm assuming that once the linked addresses get updated it will show up so shall I report back once it's done or go ahead with the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd send the cca to the dca anyway

 

who is it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd send the cca to the dca anyway

 

who is it?

 

dx

 

Wescot,

 

Ok I'll get that sent off as soon as i can get a postal order.

 

Just to clarify,

 

"This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.[77/78/79]" - 78 is running account and therefore credit cards?

 

"you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply" - is that correct or should it also be 78?

 

Just wanted to make sure!

 

 

Many many thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

change the top bit to 77/78

 

leave the comply line alone

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Just a quick update,

 

CCA was sent last Thursday 26th, for the 12 days am I counting just working days??

 

Also received a further chase letter which was dated 30th? Shall i assume this is automated and ignore, wait for an actual response.

 

 

Thanks for any and all assistance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have had the repsonse from the DCA.

 

They have returned my letter and postal order and attached the following letter,

 

'Following your recent request for a copy of the signed agreement, our client has requested you write to the following address and state this is a 77/78 request and enclose a £1.00 postal order payable to the client'

 

I was under the impression that they had to forward it on to the creditor if it is not them? Either way it hasnt happened thst way.

 

So what should be my next step?? Send it off as instructed??

 

Thanks for any and all help as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Have let this slip over the last few days but was now looking to send off the next letter as posted above, However i don't appear to be able to access the link anymore? I don't have the correct permission?

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Is this one ok............

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?405830-Letter-for-a-Failed-CCA-Request

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent,

 

Thanks very much!

 

:thumb:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

 

 

Finally received something back from DCA,

 

Letter asking me to contact them to discuss a settlement offer to avoid further action being taken?

 

Shall i just ignore? I was under the impression that after letter 2 the couldn't pursue without providing me with that first?

 

 

Any advice greatly received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

discount letter then

 

 

begging for money

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello again!

 

This seems to be a tad never ending at the moment,

 

I have followed all the advice given so far (Thanks very much!!) and as per my last post i received a 'begging' letter from Wescot.

 

I have now received another letter from Wescot, cleverly disguised as a company called 2F, asking me to confirm my address as they have not been able to contact me?

 

Getting a bit silly now! Shall i continue to ignore or is there something else i should be doing?

 

 

Thanks as always, any help gratefully received and appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...