Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt left in Dubai - Need Advice Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I left Dubai a year ago leaving behind approximately 75k (Stirling) in debts (loan and credit cards). I was basically put in a terrible position by my UAE employer and ended up taking the easy way out - probably not the right thing to do but I didn't really fancy seeing what the inside of a UAE jail looked like.

 

On return to the UK we sold our home and moved to a different part of the country.

 

I have recently been contacted by a DCA by email and I am now worried that I could be hit with court action / repossession etc. Can they touch our assets?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was in your sole name and the assets are in your wifes name, then I cannot see what arguments could be made in a court that you have acted in a way to deny any creditors a chance of making a recovery. At the time you sold the property and assets were then registered in your wifes name, as long as there were no ongoing court proceedings, I think you should be ok.

 

In your position, if you have only had an email, I would wait for a letter through the post. I suspect that your new address will show up on your credit record in due course, so it is just a matter of time before you receive the letter. If any of the Dubai financial agreements allow them the right to seek recovery in any country you are reside in, subject to the consent of the courts in the country of residence, then it is possible it could go to a UK court. I am sure I have read of companies trying to enforce Dubai debts in the UK with mixed success. Even if you were taken to court and lost, if you don't own any assets at the time the court action is commenced, then it would be a case of looking at what you could afford to pay from any income.

 

When you get the letter, just write back to explain your situation ( retired due to war injuries on limited income, with no assets held in your name) without any admission of owing any debt and ask for copies of any agreements you had with the original creditors, together with statements of account. Perhaps ask them to fulfill any rights you have under Dubai law in relation to disclosure of information and to provide information on Dubai law that applies. Send recorded delivery and keep a copy. Then if they ever went to court, you will have a letter to confirm that you did make requests for information in response to their letter. Many of the Solicitors (debt collectors in reality) in the UK who chase the Dubai debts, appear to just try to collect on the debts, but are no great at providing information. This is going off what I have read previously stated by those chased.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these debts with UK based companies?

 

It is essential to give us the following information so that we can advise fully other wise all is speculation and waffle.

 

1. Are these accounts with UK based companies?

2. Which companies are these?

3. Which DCA has contacted you?

 

For any 'enforcement' action to be taken on any debt, the creditor must first exhaust 'normal debt collection' procedures, then the possibility of a County Court Claim is their next move, they have to win the claim, if you do not pay as the judge orders then the creditor may seek to enforce the judgement by warrant of execution to seize goods to sell to pay the debt.

 

Attachment of Earnings Order to deduct payment from salary/ wages.

 

Or a charging order on property to secure a debt.

 

Ultimately for debts over £750 a statutory demand for payment is made, the first step to bankruptcy.

 

ALL a very long way from where you are now.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt (credit cards and loan) is with an Abu Dhabi bank - I owe no money to any UK or international companies.

 

The email was sent to an email a/c that I no longer use (it was the one I registered to my UAE bank) they claim to be acting for the bank in question but will not disclose details unless I confirm my identity or contact them via telephone.

 

If they want to chase me they can (and probably will) but can't get much! What worries me is that they could go after assets that are in my wife's name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your wife had nothing to do with these debts, then they cannot touch her assets. It would be a different matter if you were aware of court proceedings in Dubai before you transfered any assets to your wife.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

the DCA will not discuss the case with me unless I prove my identity I still do not know what has happened regarding court proceedings in Dubai - I can only assume I have been convicted of something as defaulting on debt is a criminal offence in Dubai.

 

To give a bit more detail

- before I left Dubai my company had promised me a promotion, raise and bonus for bringing in a large project on time

- a month before the contract was due to finish (on time and on budget - very rare for Dubai) my company terminated my contract - via telephone when I was back in the UK for a long weekend.

 

As the contract had not finished they withheld my bonus and refused to pay me my termination pay until I returned to Dubai and cleared with the company.

 

I got in touch with a UAE solicitor who told me I didn't have a leg to stand on and my best bet was not to come back because if I couldn't settle my debts in full I would be arrested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt (credit cards and loan) is with an Abu Dhabi bank - I owe no money to any UK or international companies.

 

The email was sent to an email a/c that I no longer use (it was the one I registered to my UAE bank) they claim to be acting for the bank in question but will not disclose details unless I confirm my identity or contact them via telephone.

 

If they want to chase me they can (and probably will) but can't get much! What worries me is that they could go after assets that are in my wife's name.

 

Is this by 'phone or e-mail.

If by e-mail : just 'bounce' their mails

 

If by phone:

"they claim to be acting for the bank in question but will not disclose details unless I confirm my identity or contact them via telephone."

 

Do neither. Let "them come to you" by writing to you : if they aren't sure who you are when they call you, why should you give them any details.

 

If I phoned you out of the blue why should you give me any of your personal info? Why should them calling you be any different?.

 

Repeat (to them), as required : "I don't disclose my personal details on the 'phone. I'm unsure if this is a matter that relates to me, but if you are sure it does: write to me"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in the court claims form sent out you are able to challenge immediately that the UK courts do not have jurisdiction to hear any case regarding a debt incurred in Dubai. The claimant would then have to make their case as to why the UK courts are able to deal with it.

 

Can I suggest that you start to research juridiction issues regarding foreign debts, so you can be prepared if they do ever issue a court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fairly happy that I could challenge on grounds of jurisdiction, especially as the credit/loan agreements are both governed by the law of the UAE. I really want to know if anyone can tell me if assets in my wife's name are vulnerable or not. Also I can find lots of stories on the internet regarding people being threatened etc - but I can find nothing anywhere regarding successful prosecutions for debts based in the UAE - if anyone can point me to anything I would be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are looking for someone to provide a magic piece of information that says that 100% the assets in your wifes name cannot be touched. I am not sure this is possible, as if there was an existing court proceeding in Dubai at the time you transfered assets to your wife, then I expect that the claimant would look at this. It is then up to arguments being made at the time of any court hearing.

 

Here is a previous thread about jurisdiction which is worth reading.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?385979-Dubai-Debt-through-UK-Courts

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Previous post and The touting and wrong advice regard interpol to generate business has been removeddo not be spoofed by it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to what dx has said.

 

Interpol has a page for the UAE, where the current red warnings are viewable. These warnings relate to very serious criminal matters such as murder.

 

https://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Asia-South-Pacific/United-Arab-Emirates

 

If anyone has concerns about information online about UAE authorities listing debt as fraud and obtaining red warnings through Interpol then they should think about whether information online is real or not. Just look at official information sources and news sources that you trust. Some information online is fake or deliberately misleading. If you have any concerns about Interpol notices regarding issues you might have had in the UAE, then you can always contact Interpol to check.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it turns out that the disruption we've seen in the last 24hrs is not isolated to tUK

 

 

there are numerous companies in the USA doing this too

 

 

claiming to not want money to 'solve' the really scary debt collector letters

and potential unknown Interpol red notices. [they use that as the clincher if you don't use their services.]

only to fwd you on to NWNF solicitors that want £375 for writing a one letter reply to whatever DCA wrote to you about your UAE debts.

 

 

if you dig a bit deeper into these claimed red notice stories, you never actually find proof at all.

 

 

we must be hurting their fleecing income by for want of a better word...ignoring a powerless DCA.

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

its one big fleecing exercise.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i could find out from Interpol online and other reliable media sources, there has been an increase in red notices worldwide over recent years, but there is a robust process in place. They must relate to serious crimes, must have gone through a judicial process in a country and must comply with interpol rules to be accepted. Last year, there were only 12,500 issued worldwide and they related to the most serious crimes you could imagine.

 

It is possible UAE authorities have obtained red notices for very serious financial crimes, such as a director of a company stealing money from a company, but they are not being obtained for standard consumer credit situations. Most of the debt cases we have seen reported on CAG are consumer debts, which have simply been sold by UAE Banks to UAE based debt collectors. It is very unlikely any reports have been made to interpol, but of course if UAE courts have the debts recorded, then the UAE have agreements with other Islamic countries, who also still treat some debts as criminal matters. If you travel to other Islamic countries with a UAE debt, then you might well be detained at the border.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...