Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since. I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
    • Ok many thanks. Just wanted to check that nothing else for us to do / send for the moment. Will update again once we receive a copy of their N181 and proposed directions for review. Our post is a bit hit and miss at the moment. Appreciate the help through this process.
    • Yes and will ask you if you are in agreement and or wish to add /remove any direction.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey National Endowment Mortgage, Santander giving us the runaround


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My parents have just finalised an endowment mortgage originally taken out with Abbey, (in around 1976) & were expecting a lump sum - they are now being told that they can only have 25% of the annuity in cash, & the remainder paid on a regular basis. I'm trying to help them get to the truth of it, they're sure they should be able to get this lump sum as per the original mortgage agreement.

 

They have all the relavent paperwork, however during a recent phonecall to Santander, they were told that Aviva is now "dealing with this aspect of the mortgage". They are considering the FOS, however I feel that this should be resolvable between them & the lender, & the ombudsman should be a last-resort. As I'm only familiar with my own mortgage, I'm unsure where they stand, if anybody can offer any advice here - they are adamant they've never signed any "changes to terms/agreement" type letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you check that your parents did indeed have an "Endowment" mortgage or was it a "Pension" mortgage.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you should not do is try to resolve this on the telephone.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

CitizenB, they are sure it was an endowment, & that the pension aspect was never mentioned in the arrangement - from what I gather, this is what it's now being refered to, by Santander/AVIVA. AVIVA come into it as Santander are telling them "AVIVA now deals with this arrangement" - ? Why not try to resolve on the fone, they have written a letter asking for an explanation, & mentioning they wanted a response within 14 days - this was around a month ago, no reply.

 

The mortgage was for £16.5k originally, & the basic idea was that the payout would settle the mortgage balance in full, at completion of the term - They have been overpaying, & have paid the mortgage up in full, on the understanding that they would get the 16.5k in cash. Santander are now saying that they can only have a maximum of 25% as a lump sum, with the remainder spread over (monthly, I think) payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again and thank you for that.

 

Do your parents have all the documentation from setting this up? It sounds as if the endowment/pension plan is with Aviva, who were called something else in 1976, maybe Norwich Union/Commercial Union/Provident Mutual? I think there were others who were bought by Aviva.

 

If Aviva sold the policy to your parents, your argument would be with them, unless Abbey National sold it as agents for Aviva. A possible problem I can see is that 1976 was well before the Financial Services Act, so I'm not sure how a mis-selling case would be affected. There was less paperwork in those days.

 

If your parents can find the setting up paperwork, this would back up their argument. Do they know they name of the policy they were paying into, maybe from their bank account details or from Aviva's paperwork.

 

Sorry for all the questions. I'll also send a message to the Aviva rep here and see if they can help at all.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few questions that might need asking so it really is important you obtain the paperwork.

 

Was the Endowment in BOTH your parents names - in which case, I cant see this being a Pension Policy.

 

Did either of them qualify for Company pension schemes - in which case if this is a Pension Policy, it might have been mis sold.

 

This of course is all assumption based on the information you have provided to us.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support
CitizenB, they are sure it was an endowment, & that the pension aspect was never mentioned in the arrangement - from what I gather, this is what it's now being refered to, by Santander/AVIVA. AVIVA come into it as Santander are telling them "AVIVA now deals with this arrangement" - ? Why not try to resolve on the fone, they have written a letter asking for an explanation, & mentioning they wanted a response within 14 days - this was around a month ago, no reply.

 

The mortgage was for £16.5k originally, & the basic idea was that the payout would settle the mortgage balance in full, at completion of the term - They have been overpaying, & have paid the mortgage up in full, on the understanding that they would get the 16.5k in cash. Santander are now saying that they can only have a maximum of 25% as a lump sum, with the remainder spread over (monthly, I think) payments.

 

Hi gavva1,

 

I'd like to help look into this for you and your parents.

 

Can you please email me at [email protected] with the following information:

 

  • Your parents full names
  • Dates of birth
  • Current full address
  • Any plan or policy reference number
  • Please also mention your CAG username
  • Any other details you'd like to include

As soon as I have your email I'll liaise with the relevant team to have this investigated for you.

 

Kind regards,

 

Martin Banwell

Aviva Social Media Support

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-You for the replies - Santander are referring to it as an endowment policy in their correspondence, to update - the policy was taken as an interest-only mortgage with an endowment policy - I believe my Mother was in employment by the local primary school at the time it was arranged, in 1987. She would have been contributing to a county-council pension scheme. My Father was self-employed.

 

The endowment aspect was with Norwich Union, (possibly another company at the time, who were taken over by NU ) who then became AVIVA - Their understanding was that it was perfectly OK to overpay the monthly payments, & then collect the lump-sum at completion - which was intended to settle the mortgage balance (I'm unclear how they were overpaying an interest-only mortgage)

 

I've contacted the guy at AVIVA, with all the requested info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Righto, there should not have been a pension mortgage written up for your mother.

 

 

Lets see if Martin of Aviva can shed some light on to this for you.

Edited by citizenB
Incorrect information posted up.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HoneyBee, the original endowment was with Provident Mutual, & was in both their names. Also, although the original mortgage was arranged in 1976, this rearrangement was made in 1987. (Unsure if that affects the misselling guidelines?) Martin has replied to say he's forwarded this issue to the endowments team at AVIVA, hopefully they'll be back in touch soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well AVIVA have been back in touch, the jist of their reply:

 

"We’re sending full policy details out in the post to your parents.

 

I can’t go into specific details of the policies, but I can confirm that we can’t trace any endowments. We recommend getting in touch with Santander to request full details on the mortgage your parents have."

 

We're in the process of getting Santander to send everything they have, so when they say they can't trace any endowments - I'm assuming that's as opposed to pension-mortgages? /Pension-policies? If that's correct, they are claiming that this is how the thing was transferred to them, from Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

That sounds very confusing to me. I don't really understand the relationship between Abbey and Aviva, it would be nice if they could confirm. Maybe the letter to your parents will give more information.

 

I don't suppose you've found any more information from when the loan was set up?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you receive the policy details and the mortgage information from Santander, it might shed more light on this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A "letter Of Authority" has arrived from Santander, which requires a signature from My Parents & Myself - it requests, alongside signatures & personal details, the "Pension Provider(s) & Pension Policy / Membership number(s)" - I'm now dealing with it, but if we provide the mortgage Ref. & then sign the letter, are we then agreeing that it's a pension Mortgage?

 

I hope this doesn't sound paranoid, but I don't trust banks whatsoever, & I know enough of Santander from my own affairs to know how awful they are. Would you sign & return it? HoneyBee - I don't understand it either, from what I gather Santander basically "block-sold" a load of these to Aviva - Who incidentally were excellent at getting the info across to me VERY quickly. This suggests that they received it as a pension, which means the switch was made either by Santander, or Abbey, or Provident Mutual - now as Santander bought Abbey out, I would think the responsibility lies with them. (That's my feeling).

 

I couldn't understand how my parents were able to pay down the balance on an interest-only mortgage, but they were assured TIME & AGAIN by santander that if the balance was decreased, this would not affect the lump-sum payout intended to clear the original capital loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the letter accompanying this form, a "LETTER OF AUTHORITY" form, to allow me to deal with this on their behalf, also REPEATEDLY requests THEIR daytime phone number!! "In case we need to discuss your complaint in person". ??? I've told my parents to give them MY phone number, & not discuss the policy with them - thx to CitizenB - Are they really that big a bunch of ****s that they would try & coax an agreement from my parents, knowing that I will be dealing with it for them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A "letter Of Authority" has arrived from Santander, which requires a signature from My Parents & Myself - it requests, alongside signatures & personal details, the "Pension Provider(s) & Pension Policy / Membership number(s)" - I'm now dealing with it, but if we provide the mortgage Ref. & then sign the letter, are we then agreeing that it's a pension Mortgage?

 

I hope this doesn't sound paranoid, but I don't trust banks whatsoever, & I know enough of Santander from my own affairs to know how awful they are. Would you sign & return it? HoneyBee - I don't understand it either, from what I gather Santander basically "block-sold" a load of these to Aviva - Who incidentally were excellent at getting the info across to me VERY quickly. This suggests that they received it as a pension, which means the switch was made either by Santander, or Abbey, or Provident Mutual - now as Santander bought Abbey out, I would think the responsibility lies with them. (That's my feeling).

 

I couldn't understand how my parents were able to pay down the balance on an interest-only mortgage, but they were assured TIME & AGAIN by santander that if the balance was decreased, this would not affect the lump-sum payout intended to clear the original capital loan.

 

Hello again.

 

I'm also confused by this turn of events and will have a think. But if someone sets up any kind of policy, they sign a proposal form and should understand what they're signing up for. You can't transfer pensions into endowments or vice versa, HMRC would stop you because they're different regimes.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HoneyBee, ok thanks for that - So do you think it's OK to sign & return this "Authority Form"?

 

I'm not a legal expert, so I can only advise on what I know.

 

Why are they calling it a complaint? I understood you just want information. Complaints can take a while to investigate, unless that's what you want to do now.

 

I didn't think you need to ask them for a letter of authority When I've needed one, I've written it myself, something short and to the point like 'We [parents] authorise [son] of [address] to receive information on our mortgage/policy [number] and should be grateful if you would provide him with all relevant information that he requests.'

 

Then I've sent that letter with th reqest for information. 'I enclose a Letter of Authority and should be grateful if you would provide me with the following infomation, at the above address.' Then you haven't agreed to anything. Of course if they try to get funny about using your own letter, you've lost a bit more time.

 

Forgive me if I'm being thick, I don't understand why they're making such a meal of it, but maybe I've missed something?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My parents have now received a letter from AVIVA, saying that they've received a request from Santander for information, & saying "we've noticed that your signature has changed". It hasn't. & They've got it about a dozen times now.

 

Now, AVIVA have received a letter of authority from my parents, then Santander got the same, then Santander got a SECOND signature from them to allow them to discuss the policy with AVIVA, & NOW AVIVA WANT PASSPORT COPIES, SIGNED BY A LAWYER/BANKER (BECUASE THEY'RE TRUSTWORTHY!!)

 

I NOW FEEL IT'S TIME TO MAKE A COMPLAINT TO THE CHAIRMANS OFFICE OF BOTH THESE OUTFITS

 

If anyone can give me the address for the high-level compalints for both companies, this would be much appreciated. They're being lied-to, passed around, & we're all generally pretty sick of it now. AVIVA & Santander have had so many letters requesting signatures, what a complete joke.

Edited by gavva1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, I would send them one last letter, send it to their Head/Registered office addressed the CEO. Head it Formal Complaint. Give them 14 days to respond properly and to stop giving you the run around, you can confirm that if they don't, then you will be escalating to the Financial Ombudsman. Keep an eye on the calendar, and if no response - or they imply they are going to continue making unreasonable demands for signatures and copies of passports notarised by a solicitor, then you should not hesitate but to escalate your complaint to the Ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The saga continues, I phoned AVIVA on Monday & had a moan - They've sent a letter, expressing their sorrow that I've had to contact them (?) & they'll contact me soon to inform me who will be dealing with my concerns. To tighten up the info on this, my parents took out a mortgage in '76 with Abbey, which they rearranged in '87. The rearranged mortgage was interest-only, with a separate endowment, set up AT the Abbey Branch, but with Provident-Mutual. The interest-only payments were made monthly to Abbey, & a separate dd for the payment to provident-mutual (then Norwich Union, Then AVIVA). They overpaid the annuity, being told they would be entitled to the lump-sum at completion.

 

Their accountant had a look at the paperwork for the annuiy, & remarked it was a "pension-annuity". He knew this from the account number/letter configuration. If an AVIVA rep, Martin Banwell or anybody else, could take the reigns on this, it has taken a daft amount of time to get very little progress. I have a draft letter of complaint to the chairman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...