Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Identity Fraud: MMF & Mr Lender (PDL Finance Ltd)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first post, so I hope this is of use to someone like me.

 

I had contact from Motormile Finance UK Limited (MMF) first in June of this year, advising me of a debt (which I never took out) with Mr Lender otherwise known as PDL Finance Limited.

 

The debt I have learned was taken out in November of 2012, this i discovered from my Callcredit credit report which I applied for after discovering this information. MMF have stated that "..further to the communication from Mr Lender..."

 

I have yet to receive any communication from Mr Lender in relation to this loan to my home address, they appear to have just paid a loan to some fraudster, not confirmed by post anything and sold the debt to MMF some months later. What is worse is that after a couple of months communications by post and email (which they do not seem to acknowledge or respond to) I have to print out the email and post it to them (MMF).

 

This week I received a very short letter from MMF after I made an official complaint, advising me that the debt IS NOT FRAUD, and that collections activity will resume.

 

This made my blood boil and me feel quite sick to say the least. I do not have an account number (yet) from Mr Lender, which I have this week requested, as I am therefore referring this complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman and they require an account number, I only have the MMF Reference Number.

 

The FSO told me that MMF will have to give the debt back to Mr Lender/PDL Finance Ltd and they will investigate and make an adjudication. I also have taken out CIFAS Registration to try and prevent fraud happening again.

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get actionfraud involved. Mmf think uk law does not apply to them.

 

Contact the oft and fca as well.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've asked someone to pop into the thread when he has time. He has a lot of experience with mmf and may be able to help you get this sorted

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Looking in as requested.

 

I'm going to draft a letter for you to put MMF on notice that they MUST properly investigate this matter and make fully reply.

 

 

Private & Confidential

For The Personal Attention of:

Mr Roberts Sands

Director of Compliance

MMF Ltd

 

Date:...................:

 

Ref: use MMFs

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT:

Breaches of OFT Guidance on Debt Collection.

Fraudulent Loan Application

Failure to Properly Investigate.

FOS Statement.

 

Dear Mr Sands,

 

TAKE NOTE this communication is made as a FORMAL COMPLAINT and MUST be fully answered within 56 days from the date hereon.

 

I refer you to correspondence from MMF Ltd dated xx.xx.xxxx, bearing reference No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx., this is in regard to an alleged debt arising from a fraudulent account opened in my with 'Mr Lender' a 'payday loan' company.

 

I do NOT acknowledge any debt to MMF Ltd., I am not now nor ever have been a customer of Mr Lender.

 

Having made a previous complaint to which MMF Ltd have made no proper reply, not having explained of proved in any way that the alleged debt is not fraudulent, this FORMAL COMPLAINT is made prior to complaints to the regulators regarding the conduct of MMF Ltd and its fitness to hold a 'Consumer Credit Licence.

 

I refer you to the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2006 updated Nov.2012 and in particular section 3.9 (j) (Deceptive and/or unfair methods [of debt collection]:

 

This clearly states that ' it is (unfair) requiring an individual to prove that he is not the actual debtor who owes an outstanding debt', as I have clearly and formally stated that I am not the debtor MMF Ltd seeks ALL collection activity WILL now cease.

 

The FSO has advised me that MMF Ltd should pass the alleged debt back to the creditor, the matter will be investigated and an adjudication made.

 

I also refer MMF Ltd to section 3.9 (k) of the guidance which It must be aware of given the companies unenviable reputation for ignoring guidance, regulation and legislation relating to debt collection.

 

For clarification and the avoidance of any misunderstanding MMF Ltd MUST not the following;

 

1. I name do not acknowledge any debt to MMF Ltd, and confirm that I am not now nor ever have been a client of Mr Lender PDL.

 

2.This account is fraudulent and all liability is denied.

 

3. MMF Ltd MUST return this alleged debt to the original creditor for investigation

 

4. MMF Ltd WILL cease all contact with me other than in writing by Royal Mail, (proof of posting is not accepted as proof of delivery).

 

5. I am aware that MMF Ltd frequently makes 'threats' of 'Home Visits' take note such visits are NOT acceptable, despite MMF Ltd claiming such prohibition does not apply to it, this is of course nonsense.

 

Mr Sands, this is a personal communication and I require your personal attention to this matter.

 

This communication is sent by RM record/signed for delivery, its receipt will be checked.

 

I suggest you copy this with a covering note to the Compliance Manager at Mr Lender as well.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi,

I was a victim of identity fraud in around June 2012. "Someone at the time took out loans in my name with quick quid and lending stream".

It was a lot of hassle at the time

( I went through the police action fraud, recived a crime number and after a month or so I signed a couple of letters from both companies and the matter was cleaned up.

 

I also opted at that time to put extra restrictions on anyone else trying to fraudulently take out any more loans in my name.

 

"Let me just say that I have never ever applied or taken out any loan other that a mortgage for our home that is now fully paid off".

 

back in June 2017 I started receiving letters from MMF motormile finance now Lantern, stating that I owed them £250 for another loan from what turns out to be taken at around the same time as the other loans in 2012!

I phoned them straight away and explained what had happened.

But all this did was for them to send demanding letters on a weekly basis!

 

I forwarded the police action fraud crime number from 2012 thinking that that would be the end of the matter.

But all they do is keep sending me more demanding letters.

 

Are these people above the law or what!

They keep asking for very personal details e.g bank statements from 2012,

my national insurance number,

payslips,

photo id from a passport or driving licence.

 

I'm sure it would be reckless to send such sensitive information to a bad debt collecting company!

 

(Do they cover their costs by selling on this very useful and very accurate information to third parties?)

It would be very lucrative if they did as they would have all the information to take out a loan in my name!!

 

What's going to happen in another few years, Am I going to get demanding letters form another bad debt company??

 

As much I want to clear my name I am very sceptical about about how they would use that information.

I lay awake at night worrying myself to death, I am frightened about what they might do.

 

I have been to Citizens advice bureau who just say go to police action fraud! its bonkers.

 

If a company doesn't accept a police action fraud number and the evidence from the time of the identity fraud then they are surly acting above the law!

Edited by Ian-Do
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to create your own thread ian. You posted on a 5 year old one.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...