Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Very Old Barclaycard Charges ***Settled by way of Tomlin Order***


tnook
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

as they did with the old SAR system too..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such thing

 

do you mean the sheets to calculate the interest charged on penalty charges?

 

cisheet

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that the one. Thanks!!

 

Do you think I should try claim contractual interest? Have there been any successes?

 

I just used the spreadsheet and compared the Statutory 8% vs Contractual 19.9% on a single £25 charge from July 1998. The difference is staggering.

 

For 8% = £91.87

 

For 19.9% = £924.18

Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been successes yes

see the shelley threads and martin2006 threads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading the Shelley threads. Wow, mind blown. You guys are a great help.

 

Was interested in the amount of interest to apply for restitution. Slick you mention 29.9% as good number. Crumbs if I apply that then a single £25 charge from 1998 will attract compound interest of £ 4,678.68. I expect I have about 30 to 40 of these charges, so the total claim could be over £150,000. This will no doubt attract a lot of resistance from BC. Plus won’t it put me out side the small claims track?

 

I’m willing to give it a go if you can guide me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tnook,

 

Get the necessary data first, then enter it on the Spreadsheet and let us know what the figures look like.

 

I've always preferred the rate of 24.9% despite what has been claimed in the past. Also, we must bear in mind that the likes of yourself, Shelley, Kate999, etc won their claims years ago and cases since then have been defended.

 

I've just seen you went through the reclaim process and won some 8 years back - it may be different now and I'll look for more recent cases as examples. Old thread is here - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?257056-Claiming-BC-charges-over-6-years-**CHARGES-REPAID-with-CONTRACTUAL-INT-T**

 

Also, anything reclaimed over £10K carries greater risks :-

 

1. The case may be more vigorously defended by a bank who cares nothing about the legal costs they incur.

 

2. The risk of costs going against you are greater with cases NOT heard on the Small Claims track of the County Court system.

 

3. The costs involved increase significantly on Fast and Multi Track claims.

 

I'll come back with links to more recent cases later .............

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they refuse to release data because it's on Microfiche, you can complain to the ICO or you could take direct court action seeking nominal damages for failure to comply with the SAR. I assume you will now complain at their failure to disclose the data re charges on your B a/c.

 

This was a case from earlier this year - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?460786-Barclaycard-Charges-Reclaim-and-now-Default-Removal&p=5097754&viewfull=1#post5097754

 

It starts part-way through the claim but you should take time to read it right through.

 

On reflection, Johnhn should perhaps have accepted the offer and not continued the claim JUST to have the default removed. The change of judges may also have played a part in the case being lost but that's always a risk.

 

Get the data and read through the whole of Johnhn's thread.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read Johnhn's tread. Feel really bad for him and annoyed that a judge who is ignorant of the regulations and law can just do that.

 

The lessons I am taking from this are firstly I'll be sensible about settling if it's the right thing to do. Secondly learn everything about how credit card charges are not covered by the OFT vs Nationwide case, so that I can argue it strongly in court if needed.

 

Are there anymore recent examples of BC successfully defending claims?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TN,

 

I can't recall any other recent threads (in the last 5 years) where BC successfully defended.

 

I've just moved a couple more threads into the Barclays Successes forum - cases (probably) won by HPMum and Martin2006 but can't say for sure due to confidentiality clauses.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time limitations.

 

I know we tend to rely on Kleinworth to overcome the 6 years limitation, but I was reading there is a 3, 6 and 15 year limitation which the banks will use to get cases dismissed. See links below from the MSE forum and practical law site.

 

Is this a problem for older claims?

 

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=571302&page=156#topofpage

 

https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/1-518-8770?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Defaul++t)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1&comp=pluk

Link to post
Share on other sites

we've never seen Barclays try that they know diff

as for MSE

I wouldnt believe anything that's written there...

 

practical law...well but the fact is here its WHEN YOU REALISED not any other time.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It's been 3-4 weeks now and no reply from BC. I asked for the statements for the accounts but nothing, not even an acknowledgement. I guess this is standard. What's the next step go to the Information Commissioner or just straight to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

give em a ring

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to a lady who was nice but had no idea what was going on.

She checked the records and said they send a letter early July.

 

This was the original incomplete set of data.

No mention of my letter from mid July requesting they complete the request with the specific Visa and MasterCard information.

 

The lady said shel'll give me a call sometime next week if she hears back from the relevant department.

 

I don't feel super confident they will comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok called again, they haven't a clue.

 

I have now sent them my LBA giving them a week to get the statements to me.

 

In the meantime I have reported the breach to the information commissioner but I won't hold my breath on them doing anything useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What address have you used to write to Barclays again.

 

Did you use a letter from our Library - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?404-Data-Protection

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok have reached the end of the road with asking Barclays nicely for the statements/data.

 

Call centre is adamant they only have 6 years of data. Letter back from Barclays saying they have already complied with the GDPR request and won’t process it again. However Iif I want to supply additional information they may look again. All the information was in my previous letters.o

 

Time to escalate it in the courts. I’ll start drafting my claim form tonight, can someone check it before I submit it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you answer the 2 Q's in my post above.

 

Have you followed Pre Action Protocol ? You'd be unwise to fire off a claim without going through the right pre-court action warnings.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was my LBA letter:

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Dept.

1234 Pavillion Drive

Northampton

NN4 7SG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

ACCOUNT /REF NUMBERS

 

Barclaycard Mastercard XXXXXXXXXX

Barclaycard Visa XXXXXXXXXX

 

I have made several requests now for transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation for the accounts listed above. From their opening in 1998 thru to their closure in 2003. I have also stated, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

You continue to ignore my requests, even though you have confirmed in writing that you have the data. For convenience I have enclosed copies of my requests.

 

I have now filed a complaint with the Information Commissioner about your statutory breach.

 

If I do not not receive the data I have requested within the next 7 days I will proceed with legal action in the county courts and a judgement will then be forwarded to the FCA.

 

Yours faithfully,

tnook

 

I've been sending the letters to:

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Dept.

1234 Pavillion Drive

Northampton

 

They're written back, so the address seems to work. Used the GDPR template from the library to kick off the process then wrote 2 more letters chasing them.

NN4 7SG

 

First letter chasing them after BC send an incomplete set of data:

 

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Dept.

1234 Pavillion Drive

Northampton

NN4 7SG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

URGENT: INCOMPLETE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATIONS - SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

 

ACCOUNT /REF NUMBERS

 

Barclaycard Mastercard XXXXXXXXXXX

Barclaycard Visa XXXXXXXXXXX

 

Thank-you for the partial completion of my GDPR request. I had specifically asked for all transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation for the accounts listed above. From their opening in 1998 thru to their closure in 2003. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

You have previously confirmed in writing that you have the relevant data and can access it, but needed the account numbers which you claimed you didn’t have.

The data bundle you sent back to me yesterday clearly shows the account and card numbers. I can’t understand why you didn’t complete a previous SAR when you clearly had the account numbers.

 

Please now complete the data access request for the above accounts within the 7 days remaining of the original request.

 

If you fail to comply with all of your obligations, I will make an immediate complaint to the Information Commissioner about your statutory breach – and without any further notice to you.

 

This may also lead to legal action in the county court and a judgement will then be forwarded to the FCA.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

tnook

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.

 

So next step is to prepare the claim.

 

What POC are you going to use - I'll seek advice to ensure your proposed action takes account of the 2018 GDPR.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...