Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UK permanent resident with Criminal record ; possible ?


loaiuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

long story short...

 

if you read in my other post back in 2010 you will see that i was issued a fine by London Magistrate court where i plead guilty for travelling without a VALID ticket ( used someone else freedom pass )

 

i could have argued and won the case in the court according a lawyer but i really didn't bother because i was told at that time that this sort of criminal record stays maximum 1- 2 years

 

but now i read in forum that Criminal record for any fines by court stays in the database for 5 years and i have to declare it all the time

 

The problem is If i apply for PR RESIDENT will this effect my application? ( EUROPEAN ROUTES ) I heard Home office automatically refused all application with criminal record.

 

I am really worried. That's the only bad record i've in file. Since then i never ever travelled without any valid ticket

Link to post
Share on other sites

long story short...

 

if you read in my other post back in 2010 you will see that i was issued a fine by London Magistrate court where i plead guilty for travelling without a VALID ticket ( used someone else freedom pass )

 

i could have argued and won the case in the court according a lawyer but i really didn't bother because i was told at that time that this sort of criminal record stays maximum 1- 2 years

 

but now i read in forum that Criminal record for any fines by court stays in the database for 5 years and i have to declare it all the time

 

The problem is If i apply for PR RESIDENT will this effect my application? ( EUROPEAN ROUTES ) I heard Home office automatically refused all application with criminal record.

 

I am really worried. That's the only bad record i've in file. Since then i never ever travelled without any valid ticket

 

Why plead guilty if you weren't?

 

From http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?250829-Caught-using-Freedom-Pass-...-now-what/page2 : you found a Freedom Pass, and used it "accidentally"?.

If they prosecuted you under S5.3 RRA 1889 you could have claimed "no intent to avoid your fare", but all TfL need have done is pursue an alternate (& 'strict liability') Bylaw prosecution : If your lawyer believes you'd have won that, they must be Perry Mason!

 

I'd suggest seeking advice from a lawyer specialising in Immigration law regarding the effect of your conviction.

 

Bottom line : if you want to keep a visa / obtain permanent residency or indefinite leave to remain : don't commit a criminal offence while "a guest" in the UK (the same applies for UK citizens seeking residency abroad or e.g. visa-waiver travel to the USA).

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks because I was a student lawyer charge £500 and somebody told me it doesn't stay long in the record

Now I heard it is 5 years and that's along

 

No other bad record ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The period before your conviction is spent is 5 years, if you were 18 or over at time of conviction

http://www.nacro.org.uk/data/files/nacro-2007021302-65.pdf

 

Was this a s5 RRA 1889 prosecution ? As this can (according to the CPS guidelines on prosecution) be viewed as the "principal form of dishonesty affecting public transport") and the UKBA guidelines saying that one minor offence can be disregarded but specifically say crimes of dishonesty don't qualify for this exemption

http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/britishcitizenship/eligibility/goodcharacter/

 

If this was a Bylaw prosecution you need to find out if it falls into the "minor offence, one offence may be disregarded" category : otherwise it is likely your application would be refused until your conviction is spent.

 

Again, you can ask here, but I'm not an expert, and you may be better seeking qualified, expert legal advice from a lawyer specialising in immigration matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...