Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit unions - an alternative to bank and PDL lending


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Credit unions have been around in the UK since the late 1970s and are a form of co-operative and self help organisation. They were set up to offer low-cost loans of smaller amounts for people who couldn’t get affordable credit, or who were using doorstep lenders.

 

Sadly, they are an underused resource, but they are a realistic alternative to payday loanslink3.gif [PDLs] and loansharks. As they are not profit-making, their rates are much lower than other high street lenders or PDL companies.

 

There are 400 to 500 credit unions in the UK with almost a million members. As well as low-cost loans for smaller amounts, some now offer current accounts, savings and mortgages.

 

Who can they help?

 

Whilst the main aim of credit unions was to provide affordable loans to people who can’t get help from the banks, nowadays they also appeal to people who want to bank with an ethical organisation and benefit their local community.

 

And because their rates are attractive, credit unions are becoming a popular form of affordable borrowing.

Any member of a union can apply for a loan.

 

How do I find a local credit union?

 

The ABCUL website has a search facility to find a local credit union. Once you find one near you, you will still need to check the rules to make sure you are eligible to be a member.

 

http://www.findyourcreditunion.c o.uk/home

 

There is also a helpline on 0161 832 3694..

And your local librarylink3.gif or CAB may be able to help.

Who can join?

 

Each union will have its own rules, but generally you will need to live or work locally, or belong to the same employer or organisation as other members. For example, the NHS participates, along with some transport companies, trade unions, churches and other organisations.

 

From 2012, organisations as well as individuals are allowed to be members of credit unions.

 

What is the least I can save?

 

Credit unions will let you save as little or as much as you can afford when you have money to spare, weekly, monthly or more frequently.

 

You can make deposits at your local credit union branch or local collection points like shops, or have money deducted from your wages or by direct debitlink3.gif from a bank account.

 

When you save, you know you will be helping neighbours or colleagues, rather than helping to make money for shareholders. And at the end of the year, your credit union aims to pay out a dividend on your savings, depending on how well the union has done. According to ABCUL, this can be up to 8% of what you’ve saved.

 

Many credit unions include Life Assurancelink3.gif at no extra cost.

 

How do I get an affordable loan and how much can I borrow?

 

Loans are usually available up to around £3000. To borrow, you need to be a member of the credit union. They will take into account your circumstances and make sure you can afford the repayments.

 

Life assurance should be built into the loan at no extra cost, so if someone dies owing money, it’s paid off by the insurance.

 

What will it cost?

 

This calculator helps you work out how much it might cost to repay a loan, although you would need to check with your local union. The most a credit union is allowed to charge is 26.8% interestlink3.gif, compared with 4000% for some payday loans!

 

http://www.abcul.org/credit-unions/b...a-credit-union

 

Can I pay the loan off early?

 

Yes, there is no charge for this.

 

If I invest, can I lose my money?

 

Your money is protected in the same way as other savings, by the FSCS [Financial Services Compensation Scheme].

 

http://www.fscs.org.uk/

 

Credit unions are regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority [FCA].

 

Where do I find out more?

 

For other information, here is a link to the ABCUL website. Or contact your local credit union.

 

http://www.abcul.org/home

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAGlink31.gif member Dodgeball has kindly agreed to let me post what he has written about credit unions from the point of view of a volunteer.

 

"Many of the smaller credit unions are being combined these days, six of the small CUs (membership less than 5000) have recently combined to form a larger more efficient unit, in my local area

 

But there is a cost to this, many argue that the strength of the CU lies in its approachability, people used to come in for a chat and a cup of tea whilst making there weekly investment / payment, you would be able to help if some problem was looming for them, a bit like an extended family, severe arrears were rarely a problem because everyone new everyone else, this is all changing now.

 

CU's at there best are far more than just a bank, they can be provide an holistic service to the member and his finances, encouraging not only better financial management but also involvement in the community.

 

Like most volunteers I spent some time chasing arrears and I have to say that debt collecting for a CU is a completely different experience to what you would expect, and explains perhaps what I mean by holistic. In many cases you would come away from the member after giving additional finance, the only way of getting them back on track was to lend them enough to pay some other higher interestlink3.gif loan, can you see a bank doing that.

 

In Ireland CUs have been more like mainstream banks for some time, and issue mortgages, the largest CUs in this country used to be the Police force, I believe.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been a member of my local Credit Union for over 10 years, they have helped me out a number of times when things are hard.

I can borrow £500 from my Credit Union over a one year period, paying £12.50 per week.

£10.48 going towards the loan and £1.66 towards savings.

 

(The above is based on having savings of £250 in my Credit Union Account, thereafter, once a good payment record has been established, I can borrow up to 4 times the amount I have in my savings account)

 

Total interest for the loan = £63.50

 

Total Interest for a similar Provident Loan over the same one year period would cost £410 in Interest.

 

Like the majority of Credit Unions you have to be a member and have saved for a minimum of 3 months.

 

Most Credit Unions are (not for profit) organisations, run to serve the local community and help them avoid high interest rate lenders who prey on those who can least afford it.

 

Credit Unions also provide free life cover so you can rest assured your family will not be burdened if anything happened to you, as your loan will be cleared and shares doubled and paid to your estate.

 

Here are some examples regarding Pay Day Lenders.

(sourced from the internet on 15th February 2013)

 

Payday UK

 

Borrow £200 and pay back in 30 days - interest charged £50

The same loan with a Credit Union would cost £3.94 in Interest

 

WONGA

 

Borrow £200 and pay back in 15 days - interest charged £29.59

The same loan with a Credit Union would cost £1.97 in Interest

 

Quick Quid

 

Borrow £200 and pay back in 30 days - interest charged £50

The same loan with a Credit Union would cost £3.94 in Interest

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

From this August, Glasgow City Council will deposit £10 in a community credit union account for every new secondary school student - up to 6,000 young people every year.

 

Over time, this will ensure that every young person in the city has access to a dependable, responsible option for savings and money advice.

 

Read more: http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10084

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Archbishop of Canterbury has vowed to put payday lenderslink3.gif out of business by using the Church to build up Britain’s network of credit unions.

 

The Most Rev Justin Welby has told Errol Damelin, the founder and chief executive of Wonga, about his ambition to make the controversial lenders redundantlink3.gif – by helping the 500 financial co-operatives, which already provide small loans to their members, play a much bigger role in helping people with money problems.

 

The Church of England has already set up a credit union for its own staff, which will advise the other co-ops on how to expand their reach.

 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...y-8730839.html

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...