Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ for loan that was refused


steveball1966
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3928 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Safeloans have got a ccj on loan that they refused me even though dispite numerous letters and my bank providing evidence that they never paid into the account theyhave stated the loan should have been paid into. I have now had a letter today fromthem saying that they are going to apply for an attachment of earnings but if Icontact them they can offer a 40% reduction I also never even received anycourt papers before just the judgement papers I have also checked my credit files and the judgement shows. What can I do to stop them getting an attachment of earnings for a loan I did not have they want £445 for a supposed £150 loan.

Edited by steveball1966
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a set aside asap. Your reason would be you never received any papers to the address.

 

Safeloans are abusing the legal system. They have got a CCJ on a debt that has never existed and now have the cheek to offer a discount. You must get this set aside, and then get in contact with as many authorites as possible. Make sure you contact watchdog and the national press too.

 

You can also contact actionfraud.org.uk . Infact, i would recommend that.

 

As i said, you main focus right now should be to get that CCJ set aside.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent an SOS to an admin so they can give more specific advise relating to the set aside and to where complaints need to be made.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prime case for damages since theyve broken the law, broken regulation, broken guidance and made a complete mockery of the court system.

 

If the OP can prove that the CCJ stopped him getting credit relating to a major item, such as a mortgage etc, or even a less major item, the damages could run into the £1000's.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the Durkin judgement stipulated that it was not necessary to prove any quantifiable loss or damages had occurred

 

The fact the defamation had occurred was enough to satisfy damages

 

i will need to look up Durkin to confirm though, give me 30 minutes

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case of King v British Linen & Co dealt with the situation where there had been no specific damage. The only loss which the pursuer had occurred sustained was the loss to his credit standing. That was valued by the sheriff at £100 in 1897,

 

Had there been no finding of specific loss in this case, I would have had no hesitation in finding that an award of damages for the mere injury to credit was appropriate. In modern society credit plays a very big part in the conduct of the daily lives of a significant portion of the population. The financial services industry is constantly advertising loans, credit cards, store cards, mortgages, consolidation accounts etc.

 

To have one's credit worthiness impugned so that one is at risk of being unable to obtain credit on the grounds that he is not credit worthy is, if anything, a more significant matter for the individual than it would have been at the time of King, over a hundred years ago. Mr Beynon has submitted that a figure of £10,000 would be appropriate. The figure of £100 awarded by the sheriff and left standing by the Inner House in King v British Linen translates, according to the Office of National Statistics Publication "Focus on consumer price indices" 2008, table 5/3, to £9,975 in the year 2008. The figure of £5,500 awarded to an individual in Kpohraror v WoolwichBuilding Society 1996 4All ER 119 was not interfered with by the Court of Appeal in 1996 and, in today's figures, would be worth £8,215.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys I am really surprised at the quick replies Ihave had a quick look at DURKIN V DSG RETAIL LTD AND HFC BANK LTD case and will read proper tomorrow as I have to work tonight and will be replying to your help tomorrow I do not want to apply for any credit now but I do want my name cleared just in case I need to in the future. My wife said that the loan was approvedin principle the turned down due to the fact I could not provide wage slips that showed I was earning enough as I was on sick at the time I applied which was Feb 2012 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get it set aside, and then DEMAND to know the account sortcode, number and name that the money was deposited in. It's then a simple case of matching up the records.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

£80 is better than having a CCJ with no merit or reason though. Plus theres a chance the OP could issue a court claim against the company themselves.

 

THe main thing is that the CCJ MUST be set aside, as the claimant have already made it clear they will go for enforcement orders, even though the debt doesnt exist.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Get the claim, get the judgement, and the second judgement is handed down, go straight for enforcement orders. Pref a winding up order :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

First step is to download the N244 and complete...... requesting an order that the judgment be set a side and enclose a brief outline evidencing the request.Fee £80 its important to put on the application " Costs in this application"

 

Just nudge your thread if you need assistance completing the application.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can we have an update on this? Im very interested in how they have managed this.

OP could you post proof that it was declined? Not saying i dont believe you of course, but this could be pivotal in evidence to be supplied in the case

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for no update I have filled in the N244 and I am waiting to get to get paid my salary this week and send off I have had a letter offering an £155 discount on a £445 demand from simpsons legal who I think are really safeloans considering they have the same address and telephone number .I will try to post the documents up at the weekend when I can have the use a scanner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt seem to be the case unfortunately... I will say though... They are very close together xd (CR0 & 9) Croydon?!?!?!?!

Also in the long term.... Watch this Space :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I THINK IT IS A TWO BIT COMPANY

 

Unlike using a solicitor to enforce a judgement, we do not charge by the hour and we will collect your CCJ's on a no collection, no commission basis

 

Not once do they state legal representation by a qualified solicitor

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...