Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

me and a tesco card debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3945 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok I think you need to step back from these fears.

If the Tesco Debt was defaulted in 2004 and you have NOT made any payment or acknowledged the debt in 6 clear years it is statute barred and unenforceable in court!!

 

You must send the following to Tesco Bank to be rid of this for good if you don't then they can keep pestering you.

 

 

To The Compliance Manager

Tesco Bank.

 

 

Ref: Account number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Sir/ Madam,

 

 

I refer to contact made regarding account number xxxxxxxxxx in the name of (your name) please note I do not acknowledge any debt to Tesco.

 

I have reviewed my credit history and have concluded that any alleged debt is statute barred, therefore I will not be making any payment.

 

I am aware of the OFT Guidance on Debt collection and the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debt.

 

Tesco will now cease to process all data relating to me and remove it from its records.

 

This is my final response.

 

Send by recorded / signed for delivery.

 

This will mean NO more letters from Tesco!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they are not stute barred, I have been paying them £5 every month for donkeys years.

I decided this year to try and sort my life out a bit, and try and get rid of these really old debts that were stressing me out.

 

I thought after all these years they might play nice and write them off.

 

They know my circumstances havent changed, i have been on the sick since 2005.

 

Obviously that changed this year when ATOS decided i should go on jobsekers, and the council started charging council tax.

I just couldnt afford to pay them any more.

No one is going to employ me, with my mental and physical problems.

 

But i still have to apply for jobs or they will stop my benefits.

Then i really would be in trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is really no point in us advising if you don't give us ALL the information, it does mean that you wont get advice to suit your situation.!!

 

You need to find out how much you have paid off this debt and what is still outstanding before anyone can advise you properly.

 

DEBT DOES NOT GET WRITTEN OFF, sold off over and over again YES!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really sorry. what information have i not given. I said in the earlier post. Part of the reason i worry is, RBSlink3.gif and tesco defaulted me in 2004. They still give me minor grief occasionally. I have asked them to write off the debts, but they wont play and still want there £1 a month.I thought it was understood i have been paying them. I an not very good at explaining things sometimes and can only apologise if you feel i have misled you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

new thread created for this one

 

are you still paying rbs directly?

 

have you ever sent them a cca request & an sar?

 

might be useful.

 

prob PPI/PENALTY charges to get back I bet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i have always gone through the credit card operations in southend for both tesco and rbs since they defaulted me.

 

Tesco sent me a letter in 2012 with a new account number to pay to, and a new address in glasgow.

I have for many years, paid them through my bank by manual monthly payments which i did online.

 

Tesco have normally sent me monthly statements.

Rbs started sending me monthly statements again this year, for the first time in several years.

 

The last statement i can find previously from them was in 2008.

Maybe i binned them, but i doubt it as i have plenty of letters from both of them dating back to 2004 including the defaults.

 

Rbs did send a stupid letter to my address in 2008 asking if i still lived there.

I was paying them every month, so dont know why they did that.

 

Brunel franklin did a credit agreement assessment and ppi in 2009 for rbs.

 

Though they never sent me a copy of the original agreement with the pile of paperwork.

 

Just a letter saying, it has been found your potential case does not meet all the strict criteria to enable us to continue with your claim.

 

Then asked for £300 to go for unfair charges and ppi which i declined.

 

Rbs sent me a letter in 2009 saying i never took out ppi on the card.

 

I have never myself sent them a cca request or SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then I would do as post 6

 

you need the info.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry is not the Tesco card and rbs the same debt?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...