Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Customer compliance officer interview queries and concerns


Lady_K
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a letter from the Jobcentreplus saying I was invited to an interview with a customer compliance officer. I think it was a regular letter that is sent out, it just said the visit has been arranged because your circumstances may have changed and we need to ensure your payments are correct.

 

I rang to request a home interview due to my health issues and the man said yes no problem and he would find my file and get his diary then ring me back. When he did he seemed to think there had been a mistake and said dont come to the interview but he would check through my file and if he does have to interview me he would send another appointment for a few weeks time at home.

I have now recieved a home interview appointment, no specific time just between 9.30am - 3.30pm. I am of course like most people having these interviews really worried and nervous. I feel a bit more nervous because I'm thinking why does he need to interview me now after first seeming to think it was a mistake.

I rang them again to ask what was the reason for the interview, this time a lady answered, last time it was the actual man that was going to interview me. She checked the system and said there is nothing noted on there then asked if there have been any changes and I said no so she said and its just a review type check and nothing to worry about.

 

I am worrying though and keep wondering why. I recently set up 3 new savings accounts all to be funded by £1 a month just to keep the new rules for halifax reward account as they now require you to have at least 2 direct debits from them to keep the reward, could it have triggered an interview? I also have 3 reward accounts using one as my main account and the others just basically to get the monthly reward, I have to fund them by 1k a month but only do that by transferring between one to the other. I'm worried if these accounts will confuse the situation. I have an ISA for my funeral expenses depressing as that sounds but its below the allowed threshold.

 

They have asked for id and bank statements but didnt say how many months worth, how many should I supply? as I have to request these from halifax as I have online statements or would they accept printed ones for the time being? thats if you can print them directly from online.

 

Also, will this interview be just about my ESA Support group benefit alone with Jobcentreplus as its headed from Jobcentreplus customer compliance or will it take into account my DLA HRC HRM awards as well?

 

Sorry its so long but any knowledge from other members would be much appreciated, Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

compliance interview is most likely going to be about ESA, but if you are unsure then you should phone JC and ask them

 

the thing with your bank accounts sounds a bit confusing. if i understand what you have stated, you have at least 7 accounts (3 reward accounts, 3 savings accounts and an ISA) - i would suggest printing off last 2 months statements for each of them, unless of course there have been periods where your total capital has gone over £6k

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

id6052 knows more than I do, but I just wanted to say that compliance interviews that we've seen here have been to check that your claim is in order and at least one person ended up with more money. :) People regularly come back and say they had worried for nothing.

 

I don't think you have anything to lose by being honest. If they see that you want to give them the information and ensure all is in order, I think they'll be fair with you.

 

My best, HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my experience of sitting next to the compliance team, the guy probably went to his superviser to see if he could get out of having to do a home visit by not doing a compliance check at all, and his boss said no!

 

Nothing triggers these types of compliance checks - a computer randomly picks out claims to do a check on. It is how the DWP get their error and fraud statistics, from the randomly generated compliance checks - so with error and fraud being at 0.7%, you can see how many of these checks happen with no problems at all. And yes, sometimes it is found that the person is getting less than they should - for instance SDP's not being paid are a thing that is commonly picked up on these checks and corrected resulting in increased payment.

  • Confused 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

compliance interview is most likely going to be about ESA, but if you are unsure then you should phone JC and ask them

 

the thing with your bank accounts sounds a bit confusing. if i understand what you have stated, you have at least 7 accounts (3 reward accounts, 3 savings accounts and an ISA) - i would suggest printing off last 2 months statements for each of them, unless of course there have been periods where your total capital has gone over £6k

 

Thankyou,

 

I looked again at my accounts and it does look quite confusing, because I have to fund each account with 1k a month to fit the rules of the reward accounts and I dont have 1k in each of them to do a clear 1k transfer and back I have to do several smaller transfers to make up the 1k all in one day so I don't know how they will look at that. As statements conclude by totalling money going in that month and money going out that month at the end the totals would look like I have had a lot of money going in unless they tediously go through a day to day work out, they will probably not be happy having to take so much time on them. Do they normally take statements away with them?

 

Also as you mentioned not going over 6k in total accounts including ISA I have noticed that on some occasions it has happened for short periods like a few days to just 1 day. This has happened at times when my esa payment has gone in very close to my dla payment and added to the isa its gone over the 6k.

I took some out of the isa yesterday to pay my water rates that I'm overdue with so that has dropped it a bit now but it doesnt stop what is showing on some of my past statements but its too late now anyway.

For example last month it went over because my dla and esa went in within a week and then the isa interest went in and although the isa is below 6k all combined it took it over 6k, I forgot about the interest.

My daughter was very ill in hospital at the time and everything just got left because I couldnt cope with dealing with anything because of the worry, no bills were paid no shopping bought so the balance stayed the same for a bit longer, I didnt even check my account it was the least important thing, shes still not better either but out of hospital now.

 

So its definitely gone over at times, sometimes a few days sometimes longer but does it have to be a full month over or any part of it and if its less than £250 over does that still count? I don't care about any money they will take off that I should have been charged but how will they sort it out and can I get into trouble for it?

 

So even this last months statement shows it over as it was the time my daughter was in hospital and the interest from isa went in and esa and dla, its made a bit of a mess of things.

Edited by Lady_K
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the moving money between accounts issue shouldn't be too difficult - just pre write a covering letter to go with the statements explaining what you do to keep the accounts open. Is there a reason you need all these accounts? If so put that in the covering letter too.

 

Regarding going over £6000, I doubt you'll get in any trouble for it, just have to pay back a small overpayment. It is £1 taken off your benefit for any week where your capital has been over £6000 during that week, but less than £6250. So if it went over the limit 10 times (during 10 separate weeks), then you'd have to pay £10 back.

 

Hope that helps.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I opened the 3 reward accounts simply because they reward £5 a month for each account, thats £15 a month including my main account which works out at £180 a year and its a lot to lose. Halifax have stopped it now though and only allow 1 reward account per person. I have had the accounts for a few years now and have just transferred the 1k a month between them to keep them open but they only changed the rules in April so that you have to have 2 monthly direct debits per account set up before 16th April. Because I found out late about the new rules I set up several dd savings accounts for £1 a month in case some didnt make it in time by 16th April with the intention of stopping the uneeded ones later. I also set up 2 lottery dd in case the savings dd's didnt go out on time with a plan to stop those also once the accounts were saved. If it wasnt for the rewards I wouldnt keep them. Im begining to wonder if they are worth it now.

The previous months before April dont look quite as bad as you can see its straight forward transferring between the accounts but with all the adding savings accounts dd's, the lottery dd's and a few utility dd's until the accounts are saved it looks a mess.

I have already swapped the utility dd's back to my main but that will only show on next months dd. I could close some of the savings accounts now and just keep the necessary 2 per account but I thought it might not look very good until they have sorted this stuff out but then I'll close them.

 

Also could I or the people I pay get into trouble for paying them cash in hand for doing jobs for me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I opened the 3 reward accounts simply because they reward £5 a month for each account, thats £15 a month including my main account which works out at £180 a year and its a lot to lose. Halifax have stopped it now though and only allow 1 reward account per person. I have had the accounts for a few years now and have just transferred the 1k a month between them to keep them open but they only changed the rules in April so that you have to have 2 monthly direct debits per account set up before 16th April. Because I found out late about the new rules I set up several dd savings accounts for £1 a month in case some didnt make it in time by 16th April with the intention of stopping the uneeded ones later. I also set up 2 lottery dd in case the savings dd's didnt go out on time with a plan to stop those also once the accounts were saved. If it wasnt for the rewards I wouldnt keep them. Im begining to wonder if they are worth it now.

The previous months before April dont look quite as bad as you can see its straight forward transferring between the accounts but with all the adding savings accounts dd's, the lottery dd's and a few utility dd's until the accounts are saved it looks a mess.

I have already swapped the utility dd's back to my main but that will only show on next months dd. I could close some of the savings accounts now and just keep the necessary 2 per account but I thought it might not look very good until they have sorted this stuff out but then I'll close them.

 

Also could I or the people I pay get into trouble for paying them cash in hand for doing jobs for me?

 

I think you're right that it would just look suspect to be closing down the accounts.

 

Regarding paying people cash - you're not responsible for their business practices or what they declare to HMRC. Most workmen, handymen, plumbers, dogwalkers, cleaners are paid in cash.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Could they ask me to name the people I pay in cash? I don't know if they would want me to.

 

The interview might not be all about the money though, its only a home visit because I've requested that but what are they likely to ask me? will they go through my esa application again or ask me to do anything physical or look around my house? They can look if they want but I just want to know what I should expect

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Could they ask me to name the people I pay in cash? I don't know if they would want me to.

 

The interview might not be all about the money though, its only a home visit because I've requested that but what are they likely to ask me? will they go through my esa application again or ask me to do anything physical or look around my house? They can look if they want but I just want to know what I should expect

 

No they won't want you to do anything physical or look around your house, it is just about checking that the amount you've been awarded is correct. They are generally looking at bankstatements for amounts going in, but will look at amounts going out if they believe money is being spent deliberately to keep below the capital limit - but this is only when larger amounts are involved, in which case they may ask what the amounts are for. With such complicated bankstatements, they may well just take copies away to look at later. They'll mainly want to check they see all of the relevant paperwork - ID, proof of address, proof of income (for instance other benefits), bankstatements, etc.

 

To answer the first question - if it was a large payment taking you under the capital limit then they might ask what it is for and a receipt for the work.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant give reciepts for my odd job man and private home help etc as I pay those cash in hand and dont get receipts. My daughter also gets me lump sums of money out every so often so I have money on me for anything I need to pay for, it saves her going back and forth and I just let her know when I'm running low. I just tell her to get the max amount out each time so it lets me which is £300 with halifax. They may think that is a large amount but I cant go myself and I try to cut down on trips to and from the cash machine that my daughters need to do for me. God knows with all this I feel really worried, I just hope they are going to be understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant give reciepts for my odd job man and private home help etc as I pay those cash in hand and dont get receipts. My daughter also gets me lump sums of money out every so often so I have money on me for anything I need to pay for, it saves her going back and forth and I just let her know when I'm running low. I just tell her to get the max amount out each time so it lets me which is £300 with halifax. They may think that is a large amount but I cant go myself and I try to cut down on trips to and from the cash machine that my daughters need to do for me. God knows with all this I feel really worried, I just hope they are going to be understanding.

 

everything you've said sounds perfectly reasonable, and I can't see there being a problem at all. They are generally very nice people and understand how stressful the process can be.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Well all I can do is provide the info that they request and try and keep calm and get it over with which is not easy for me I will probably be a complete mess I cant stop shaking since I got the letter to be honest.

 

Does anyone know if these officers have actually read my esa form or have details on my conditions as its quite embarrassing if they know intimate details about me, I'm just wondering how much personal information about my conditions and the care I recieve that I should be going into detail about with the compliance officer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they won't normally know detail about your illness, they are simply there to assess the monetary side of things.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Well all I can do is provide the info that they request and try and keep calm and get it over with which is not easy for me I will probably be a complete mess I cant stop shaking since I got the letter to be honest.

 

Does anyone know if these officers have actually read my esa form or have details on my conditions as its quite embarrassing if they know intimate details about me, I'm just wondering how much personal information about my conditions and the care I recieve that I should be going into detail about with the compliance officer?

 

The compliance officer will not want or need detailed information about your condition. They'll be more interested in the financial situation. It's also unlikely they'll have read your original claim form when they're just doing a routine check. They will probably have looked up the basics of your claim on the computer system JSAPS, but this holds only very basic medical details.

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The interview at home was today, the man was here probably 10 minutes.

 

I rang a second time yesterday and he answered himself, I asked what the interview was for. He checked my file and said it was just a review and absolutely nothing to worry about and he said he wanted to reasure me it had nothing at all to do with my dla and esa claims it was basically so they had all info on me bang up to date. He gave examples such as to check if I'm working or have any other income.

 

He seemed not to want to worry me and said as soon as he walked through the door that he would be 5 mins. He explained about reviews and how departments talk to each other and said he had been contacted by the inland revenue saying that I have an isa and he had to check if it was below 6k. He asked if that was right and I said yes, he then asked if it was below 6k and if it had ever gone over 6k and I confirmed yes and no. He then said the revenue had told him that at one time I had 2 ISA's at the same time but I said no I had never had 2 at once. He then said well they don't always get it right and then went on to ask if I had any other form of income from anywhere such as pensions or work or anything and I said no. He then asked for proof of my ISA and I gave it to him, its below 6k so he didnt seem bothered he said we dont care as long as its below 6k.

He filled in a form as I was answering the questions, just a sheet of paper I think it was pale green. He explained that a v in one part meant verified meaning he had seen proof of my isa balance. I had to sign it to confirm my answers but now I'm worried what I have signed as I didnt read it.

 

Since hes gone its bugging me why revenue say I had 2 isas at one time, unless it was an overlap or something when transferring in a isa year. I think I remember once not tranferring one but just taking it out in full to put it into another new one, that may have been classed as having 2 even though one of them would have a balance of 0, thats all I can think of but do you think they will come back to me about this?

 

He wasnt interested in the bank accounts even though I gave them to him he didnt even look. He didnt even ask about accounts or savings accounts just the isa.

 

I am now closing the savings accounts and reward accounts and just keeping my main one, its really not worth the hassle or stress. I dont care about getting the rewards from the halifax accounts. I dont think its that straight forward though to close the accounts especially the savings ones as I cant go to a branch due to my health issues, you cant close them over the phone, online or by post.

 

I dont know what I've signed though

Edited by Lady_K
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering why the officer only seemed interested in the revenue informing them of my isa, I gave him all my bank statements but he did not even want to look at them not even to see the balances or how many I had or the numbers or anything. Shouldnt he have checked through them?

 

Does anyone have any idea of what the form he filled in might have been? he said he just wrote down what I told him but he didnt read it back to me or give me the oportunity to read it he just pointed to where I needed to sign it. He didnt say if there would be anything further from this or not so because he didnt say that will be the end of the matter I'm wondering if it wont be..

 

I got the feeling he might not believe me when I said no I had no other income from anywhere at all and had never gone over 6k on my isa but perhaps its me just as usual worrying about everything. I'm condfused as to why the revenue would say I had 2 isas at one timedo you think they will be tripple checking that?

 

I do think though that after calling them twice prior to the interview and asking what it was for and being reassurred that it was a routine review, they could have told me it was a query from the revenue about an isa but they did not. It might be because they want to see your reaction when told to judge if they think you are lying, I suppose its understandable they have to do thier job. I dont really believe there are reviews without some query or report on them no matter what they say.

 

Do you think he will be back again?

 

I've now closed the new savings accounts I opened to create the £1 a month dd 'd to keep the reward accounts going and I'm going to close the two extra reward accounts as well, Tthe £5 a month reward from each of them is not worth the worry plus they may consider it income do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...