Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

change of payee on old RBS tesco loan CCJ


Elfet01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We are paying a CCJ alledged Tesco loan debt.

 

On the judgement papers it said we must pay Incasso, however they have appearently gone into administration.

 

We have today received a letter saying that we must now pay DWF LLP. solicitors.

 

Two points, why if we owe the debt to Tesco do we have to pay someone else,

and if that "agent" changes should this not go back to court?

 

I suspect the debt is sold and therefore these agents are third party interlopers and cannot recover the alledged debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In whose name was the judgment? Tesco? If so, they can ask you to pay someone else.

 

It’s only if the claimant changes that a substitution is necessary.

 

Further, if the account was assigned and if the judgment was in the name of a debt buyer, but only the collecting agent has changed, you could also be instructed to pay another collection agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect incasso took you to court

Tesco use them

 

if you don't start paying the new 'owners' you'll force then back to court.

to get them to substitute their name

 

might be a good idea

 

....

on a second note:

 

did you get all the paperwork?

 

did you know it was going to court?

 

got all the statements?

 

got PPI or penalty charges to reclaim?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon DX.

 

If the original judgment was with Tesco, and still is with Tesco, then all that’s being asked is that a different collection agent receives the money, which does not need to go back to court.

 

But, of course, if it has been sold...

 

Need more info from the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a two year old debt,

 

we were a little nieve then,

and judgement was awarded with much hast with us making mistakes.

 

I am a regular contributor on another site and have successfully 'beaten' various DCAs.

 

As this debt when first in arrears went to Triton credit services is it a fair assumption that it was sold,

 

also I am asking present solicitors (collectors) to furnish me with the accounting proving that Tesco is receiving our payment.

 

Interestingly at the start of the CCJ we continued to pay Tesco and Incasso (the first collector) attempted to take us back to court for non-payment,

as a representitive of Tesco

 

surely they would have known we were paying Tesco.

 

Therefore they proved theirselves as an interloper, with no first hand knowledge of the debt.

 

This debt was probably sold to collectors but getting either party to admit is probably going to be imposossible as they are all in it together..

 

...Sorry to go on, letter was sent by DWF LLP Solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

triton are rbs internal dca

so as Tesco cards are mostly RBS that would fit

but not sold. incasso are their litigators

 

WHO is the name of the claimant on the JUDGEMENT and who was their solicitors?

 

who is listed as the OWNER on your cra file details?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...