Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

cabot finance paying since 2005 for an old citi credit card debt - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3026 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Susanne exactly same as me I got letter saying 40 days etc then waited until 12 plus 2 was up then sent them the account in dispute letter off here then got another letter saying all activity was ceased etc please see my thread but basically I know they won't have a coca (mine old cities card from about 94) and I've paid them a fortune (about 4k) since 2010 so as far as I'm concerned now just gonna forget about them x see my thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that will wait until the 15 april then as thats when the 12+2 days are up then send other letter ive been in contact with citi and i know they have no record of me and they seached a long time lol ive only paid over the grand so thats not to bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to stop you both demanding you money back

 

if it''ll work is another matter.

 

but don't just accept they CAN cash-cow and get away with it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

im new to this site and not sure how it works,i had a barclaycard many years ago and took out ppi on it but failed to make updated payments due to unemployment.i then recieved a letter yesterday saying cabot have taken over the debt in 2005 but that was 8 years ago of no contact no payments.can any1 help me with where i stand.i was told after 6 years it was statured barred or something.i need help.alsothe credit card limit was 1000,now i owe 2300???

Edited by sazzlepea
forgotto add more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

see the link below on how to start your own thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello,

I too have been paying Cabot off since 2005. I had forgotten all about my Barclays student account and Barclaycard when they contacted me about since it was over 5 years after I had last used them.

 

 

I had been homeless living on the street or living in sheltered accommodation for most of those years and had just got a bed-sit and was getting back on my feet when Cabot got in touch with me about them.

 

 

I used another credit card to pay off the Barclay card. I think it was less then a thousand pounds and Cabot gave me a small discount for paying it off quick.

 

 

The Barclays account was £2800 and is now down to £900 I pay them £20 a month. Cabot call every six months wanting to know about my situation in case I can pay them more and clear it off sooner.

 

 

Funny Cabot is not on my credit file nor is Barclays or Barclaycard which I suppose is because it is 15 years since I was with them.

 

 

Barclays is a dodgy bank I have since found out and have been fined billions for dodgy deals. I would steer clear of them everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I too have been paying Cabot off since 2005. I had forgotten all about my Barclays student account and Barclaycard when they contacted me about since it was over 5 years after I had last used them.

 

 

I had been homeless living on the street or living in sheltered accommodation for most of those years and had just got a bed-sit and was getting back on my feet when Cabot got in touch with me about them.

 

 

I used another credit card to pay off the Barclay card. I think it was less then a thousand pounds and Cabot gave me a small discount for paying it off quick.

 

 

The Barclays account was £2800 and is now down to £900 I pay them £20 a month. Cabot call every six months wanting to know about my situation in case I can pay them more and clear it off sooner.

 

 

Funny Cabot is not on my credit file nor is Barclays or Barclaycard which I suppose is because it is 15 years since I was with them.

 

 

Barclays is a dodgy bank I have since found out and have been fined billions for dodgy deals. I would steer clear of them everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I too have been paying Cabot off since 2005. I had forgotten all about my Barclays student account and Barclaycard when they contacted me about since it was over 5 years after I had last used them.

 

 

I had been homeless living on the street or living in sheltered accommodation for most of those years and had just got a bed-sit and was getting back on my feet when Cabot got in touch with me about them.

 

 

I used another credit card to pay off the Barclay card. I think it was less then a thousand pounds and Cabot gave me a small discount for paying it off quick.

 

 

The Barclays account was £2800 and is now down to £900 I pay them £20 a month. Cabot call every six months wanting to know about my situation in case I can pay them more and clear it off sooner.

 

 

Funny Cabot is not on my credit file nor is Barclays or Barclaycard which I suppose is because it is 15 years since I was with them.

 

 

Barclays is a dodgy bank I have since found out and have been fined billions for dodgy deals. I would steer clear of them everyone.

 

 

thread is numerous years old

 

 

you need to start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

you wont get seen here

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread close to stop it being posted on

now

 

 

if you have an issue

 

 

start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3026 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...