Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt and Car finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3788 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi folks, i have been a lurker here for some time and this site has helped me alot over the last 3 years. I am currently in a trust deed and i am making large payments on what is a sizeable amount of debt. I do have a car (wifes) that is currently financed (finishes in May) and i am looking to upgrade as we are expecting a new arrival.

 

But no one will touch me for finance and the car is on its last legs and is costing us more to fix because of its age. Is there anywhere that anyone can recommend that will enter into a finance deal where i can get a reasonably new car ??

 

thanks

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I am not a debt expert but have had loads of experience in the motor trade spanning many years.

 

Avoid any company that will supply you a car and credit specialized for poor credit scores. The sell absolute junk in my experience, seriously anything from accident repaired cars to rubbish picked up at auction. These cars would not find their way on to a reputable dealers forecourt.

 

Thankfully a lot of the worse culprits have now gone but their are still a few smaller ones about. The cars will be nothing but trouble, have been poorly treated, have dubious service histories and will be worthless in very little time.

 

The way they work is you will call them about a car, lets say for instance you call about a Focus. They will provisionally approve you over the phone so you visit them. When you get there a problem will be announced and they will make you hang around for hours. They will then offer you a series of cars that are totally impractical. They will make you wait more hours to make you feel more desperate then come up with something similar to the car you wanted.

 

They will take you on a test drive on a carefully planned route that is easy on the car to hide knocks and bangs. In the end you will be so tired and desperate you will sign even if you are not happy.

 

A friend picked up a Vectra from one of these sharks. The warranty was worthless and the car was complete junk throughout. We even found evidence of body repairs done with newspaper. He paid about 7k for it and withing 18 months it was sold at auction for £900.

 

He is still paying the finance through an IVA today. They wouldn't even repossess it and blamed him for the condition it was in.

 

Edit: I will add I have even seen a car recently on a finance deal have an electronic box fitted. If you pay late or go over agreed mileage etc the finance company will send it a code which disables the car. They then charge a fortune to have it reactivated. I didn't believe my eyes at first.

 

My advice is go for a cheaper car and pay cash if possible. There are loads of good cars, particularly Japanese that will go on for years trouble free despite being bargain basement prices.

Edited by skookum
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...