Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Question about RBoS charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Since April of this year I've been charged a total of just over £1,300 on my two RBoS current accounts. I've been reading on this site and a couple of others (possibly affiliated) about claiming these unfair charges back so I went to see my branch on Monday last week and explained that I felt the charges were unfair under the OFT regulations brought in in April this year.

 

I got a letter on Wednesday which said that they're not prepared to refund any of the charges, I quote:

 

We believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that the amounts debited to your Account have be applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff, which we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

We have considered and responded to the Office of Fair Trading's statement of 5 April 2006. We do not accept the Office of Fair Trading's findings in relation to Credit Card fees. We are concerned that the Office of Fair Trading has publicly called into question the setting of charges applied to other products, including Current Accounts. The Office of Fair Trading has restricted its investigation to Credit Cards and made no attempt to consult with The Royal Bank of Scotland or the industry in relation to other, entirely different products.

 

Consequently, against that background, we must differ with the views expressed in your letter and will not be refunding any of the charges applied to your Bank Account.

 

Again, thank you for taking to time and trouble to write.

 

Note that the grammar and punctuation mistakes in there appear exactly as they do in the letter! Something is a bit fishy about this. For a start, I didn't write to them, I went to see them in person. This makes the above look to me like a standard letter intended to put off the "have-a-go-Joes".

 

The other thing is that basically I wanted to ask here, is what they say about these regulations being solely for credit card terms true? If it is then I guess I have no case but I did want to clarify whether or not this is just intended to put me off pursuing this. In short, do I proceed according to the step-by-step guide, and if so, given that I've been to see them and raised a concern already, at what point on the guide do I start?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice,

Niall

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard letter. A list of charges will be coming on this site with amounts shortly as I have asked someone with a bit better knowledge than myself to do so. Also any charge is unlawful if it does not reflect the true cost involved. Start at the FAQ's then at the successes bit and all the info will make you a lot clued up and Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, very helpful!

 

I've had a look at the FAQs and at this point I have one further question. I read that by way of retaliation, the bank can close my accounts which may detrimentally affect my credit rating. I don't particularly want to keep my business with the RBoS and will seek to move my accounts to another bank regardless of any action involving refunding charges. In view of that, would I be as well to move my accounts elsewhere (i.e. find a bank that will move my overdrafts to my new accounts with them) before proceeding with a claim against the RBoS, with the aim of eliminating the risk of a damaged credit rating? If I do this, will that have any further consequences relating to my claim against the RBoS?

 

Thanks again and thanks in advance,

Niall

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...