Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appealing to upper tribunal - need urgent guidance - please!


fran1phil
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My prior thread had failed to generate much help in my case, as I think I had tried to give avery full account of my situation (or my son's); that it was just terribly confusing for anybody to read.

 

I am therefore; just requesting any advice /guidance in the process of appealing to the upper tribunal.

 

A very brief account: (bullet points)

 

*My son applied for DLA (claiming again); approx Nov 2011;

*he was turned down flat by DM; so he requested tribunal appeal

*Appeal bundle/paperwork; had been vast in volume (it had all his history/back to age 15?)

*He opted for oral hearing with representative

*appeal proceeded without him, he had not been notified

*the tribunal then wrote to my son, setting aside decision and offering a new hearing?

*again my son opted for oral hearing

*the situation repeated itself and they went ahead with hearing; in his absence (day before notice date?)

*he received decision of them awarding him LRC and no mobility

*he requested statment of reasons - in order to appeal further (decision date 9/09/2012)My

*he wrote requesting this and made numerous telephone calls - chasing it up

*In November 2012 - he received statement of reasons (for original tribunal decision/set aside)

*he telephoned and wrote again - requesting statement of reasons

*Statement of Reasons received via post; dated the 18 December 2012

 

So it has taken over 3 mnonths just to get the statement of resons - in order to start the process of requesting leave to appeal. :shock:

 

This whole situation seems to have been flawed with errors, can anybody give me some guidance in preparing letter to upper tribunal and who's attention I should mark it for.:???:

 

Unfortunately, my son's legal representative has withdrawn from the matter, owing to their demise (welfare advice charity); they had written to tribunal several months ago to advise of this; hoping hearing may have been sooner. This situation has also led to my son not having representation now, unless he appoints new representative and will have to start from the beginning. :x

 

I thought if I could at least prepare and send letter, requesting leave to appeal - it would reduce the need for further horrendous delays being caused.

 

Any help advice or guidance, would be greatly appreciated. Happy New Year to everyone!!!!!!!!!!! :-D

 

NADIA PHILLIPS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, why was your son not informed twice of the oral hearing date? Was this because the letter didn't get to him, or was a paper hearing held by mistake in both cases?

 

Secondly he will need a rep to go to upper tribunal - these cases have to be argued on points of law and most won't have the knowledge to rep themselves.

 

Thirdly, what have you highlighted on the statement of reasons that you think is wrong?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand your post correctly, the error of law is the fact that the FTT went ahead without hearing your son (as they did in the first tribunal).

 

Here's a quote from Disabilityrightsuk .org:

 

"VI. breach of ‘the rules natural justice – This includes failing to follow FTT procedure, for example failing to give parties 14 days’ notice of an oral appeal hearing or failing to inform parties that it intends to take into account a matter not addressed in the appeal papers or during the hearing. It also includes failure to follow the procedural rules for all judicial process, for example bias or not allowing a party to speak."

 

In the first instance, I would use this as your reason for appealing.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

minibits:

 

Thankyou for your response, very helpful as gives me something to go on! I was wondering if you might be able to point me towards a link that may offer some good examples 'model letters' for my purpose? Ie: requesting leave to appeal / reason for late request etc/

 

I would be extremely grateful if you may be able to help me further and thank you for your help so far.

 

Nadia Phillips

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can find UT1 forms, etc on the Upper Tribunal's website

 

http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/HMCTS/GetForm.do?court_forms_id=2759

http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/HMCTS/GetForm.do?court_forms_id=2758

 

For appeals to the Upper Tribunal, you need to demonstrate that the First tier Tribunal has failed to correctly apply the law.

 

Finding flaws in original decision is based upon giving the Statement of Reasons a detailed examination. I would advise seeking professional advice either from Welfare Rights or a specialist legal adviser.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So am I right in thinking, that in order to appeal to the UT you firstly have to request leave to appeal via the FTT??

Do I request leave to appeal to the UT or am I asking to appeal again to the FTT based on erroneous in law stuff?

Any idea how long process takes, from their receiving my request??j

 

Thanks

Nadia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nadia,

Sorry I didn't see your previous post. I sincerely wish I could help you more, but I think id6052 is correct, in that you will ultimately need a legal advisor, if you get to the UT.

 

I can say though, that firstly, you are right and you have to ask for leave to appeal to the FTT. If that fails, then you apply to the UT, and I believe id6052 has supplied links to those for you. I am pretty sure they will be included in the decision letter from the FFT, if they refuse leave.

 

All the very best to you, and please ask for any further advice, as you never know who is reading and who may have the information you need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So am I right in thinking, that in order to appeal to the UT you firstly have to request leave to appeal via the FTT??

Do I request leave to appeal to the UT or am I asking to appeal again to the FTT based on erroneous in law stuff?

Any idea how long process takes, from their receiving my request??j

 

Thanks

Nadia

 

You request leave to appeal from the FTT first. The you appeal to the UT.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that information - I am pretty clear on the route my letter 'requesting leave to appeal' takes. But I now need to get down to the matter of writing the letter and getting it sent off asap. In my initial letter to the FTT requesting permission - is it absolutely necessary for me to list & detail every error of law/or procedure I am objecting to: explaining fully all the errors & why etc? Its just that it is fairly full-on and I have still a lot to get through. Would it be inappropriate to list a couple of errors; briefly clarify and explain I will present more errors/details etc in due course ?

I assume the FTT take a while to deal with your request and even if the response is favourable, you still have to go to the UTT for decision to be reached, giving me /representative plenty of time to prepare more.

Please advise - as I dont want to give too much information at this stage unnecessarily, but I am aware of the time passing by quickly!!

Many thanks

Nadia Phillips

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that information - I am pretty clear on the route my letter 'requesting leave to appeal' takes. But I now need to get down to the matter of writing the letter and getting it sent off asap. In my initial letter to the FTT requesting permission - is it absolutely necessary for me to list & detail every error of law/or procedure I am objecting to: explaining fully all the errors & why etc? Its just that it is fairly full-on and I have still a lot to get through. Would it be inappropriate to list a couple of errors; briefly clarify and explain I will present more errors/details etc in due course ?

I assume the FTT take a while to deal with your request and even if the response is favourable, you still have to go to the UTT for decision to be reached, giving me /representative plenty of time to prepare more.

Please advise - as I dont want to give too much information at this stage unnecessarily, but I am aware of the time passing by quickly!!

Many thanks

Nadia Phillips

 

when you go to UT, the deciding on leave to appeal is the last input the FTT will have on the matter, so every argument needs to be made in the leave to appeal. There are several things that can happen when you ask leave to appeal, they say yes, they say no, they can set aside the original decision and order a new tribunal.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Are you saying then, I only have to write to the first tier tribunal, giving client details and reference, requesting leave to appeal to the UT as FTT decision was erroneous in law. Without full details re errors etc or I do? Sorry I got a bit confused at that bit. If you could just clarify that for me that would be great.

Thanks again

Nadia Phillips

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Are you saying then, I only have to write to the first tier tribunal, giving client details and reference, requesting leave to appeal to the UT as FTT decision was erroneous in law. Without full details re errors etc or I do? Sorry I got a bit confused at that bit. If you could just clarify that for me that would be great.

Thanks again

Nadia Phillips

 

You need to write with full details of the errors of law you think have been made.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...