Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

twoofus v YB ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

'm fairly new on here and have been trying to take as much in as I can as regards banks mischarging, you will probably all laugh and call me a divvy but 'manual interventions' or 'manuals' as most seem to call them feature on the S.A.R.s request and I can't seem to find out what they are and what they will prove. Any explinations and mockery of my intelligence will be gladly accepted.

 

Thanks

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Do you mean that they can justify manual charges because they have to pay the wage of the manual operator as opposed to a computer generated charge that would obviously only cost minimal electrical usage??

 

Thanks for your reply

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

Yes it costs pence to send an automated letter so to justify their chrages they would have to PROVE that someone had acted in response to you exceeding your overdraft limit. Seems all quiet on the western front up to now!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you my friend, that was the last bit I wanted to know about before sending my S.A.R. Watch out First Direct and Yorkshire Bank, you are in my sights:razz:

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

was just wondering, I had, up until about 3 years ago, a joint account with my wife and have no account info that I can find. Will I be able to find out what the account number was just by phoning and asking them or is there some other path I have to take???:confused:

 

Thanks

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi , think all you need to do is send a DPA Letter to them , any banking info they have on you they will send , remember to include £10 postal order for it thou , template is on site for you to use

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right, the SAR covers all information no matter how many accounts you have. They may try and delay matters, but just send full names, current address and any change of address since closing the account. They have started saying that they need sort codes but this is ridiculous. You could put the branch you were with on if you like.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife and I currently have a Yorkshire bank account each of which we know the account number and we used to have a joint account but we don't know the old acc. no. to that one.

 

1) When we submit our SAR, should we do it separately ?

 

2) Will it be a problem not having the old joint account number, have heard Yorkshire Bank like to play games as regards things like this?

 

3) I have heard that they have to divulge all my banking history (even joint accounts) if I request a SAR for just my banking would we both have to sign it to get the joint account info??

 

Does anyone understand what I mean or am I just confusing the issue, basically what is the best way to approach 3 bank accounts by 2 of us when one was joint?

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there

 

NO i dint think your confusing, or at least i dint feel any more confused than usual.

 

Re the joint accounts, we have two accounts with Abbey, a joint and a sole account.

 

For simplicities sake i sent off two SARs one signed by both of us and the other signed by me alone.

 

I dint think the DPA considers joint applicants or if it does i dint recall seeing it. Anyway although in theory one of the signatory's can ask for the data I would send a letter from both of you for the joint account.

 

Re not having the old account number, they may ask for a form of ID, send them a recent utility bill or similar with your SAR and if you have moved since using the account confirm your old address too.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Glenn

 

Thats pretty much what I was planning to do mate but just wanted a bit of clarification and guidance as Yorkshire Bank are supposed to like to play games and delay as much as they can.

 

Again, thanks for you time

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

To reduce initial paperwork, do you think YB would accept a SAR with both mine and my wifes seperate account numbers on it but as we no longer have the account number of the old joint account simply state in the letter that we want this joint account info aswell and both sign it?

 

What does anyone think?

 

Once we have the statements we could then split them in to 3 accounts and go from there, couldn't we?:confused:

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its worth a try, and of course you can always send them a single tenner too.

 

If they reject it then you know where you stand. I did it differently but would be happy to see others move the process forward and then we can all learn something.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or you could try nipping into your local YB branch with some ID and asking them if they can search their records for yout joint account number. That way your SAR will be more complete and less likely to be mishandled.

 

Glenn's right, one crisp tenner will cover all three accounts.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE: Unknown joint account number.

 

 

My wife tried going in the branch with I.D. and asking today and was given varying excuses as to why they couldn't give her it. She was asked why she wanted it and said it was for private reasons so the guy said "If you can't tell me why then I can't give you it":o . He also informed her that they only keep records for 5years:confused: , that they will no longer have details as the account was closed, that all records are held in Leeds and that they do not have access to them, and that it will cost her money to find out the account number although he didn't know how much.

 

As you can see YB have covered every conceivable excuse in a 5 minute chat, apart from "the dog ate the number Miss":p .

 

She did kick off a bit and was told he would "Try his best to find it out" and ring her with it later, but I think this was just a ploy to keep her quiet and get her off the premisses. Guess what, no they never phoned:mad: .

 

Anyway, looks like I'll have to try and do the S.A.R. for this just stating the account holders full names and addresses with signatures from us both and hope they play ball.......you never know

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, modified this paragrath at the start of the S.A.R. to try and stop any YB wriggling, what do you think.......?

 

'Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my full banking history with your organisation, this includes a now closed joint account for which we do not have the account number, in the names of myself and my wife Mrs X. To assist you in retrieving the information on this account and to prevent any delays in this matter I am providing you with our previous address (see footnote) at which the account was held, and both mine and my wives signature as authorisation for the release of account details with both of our knowledge. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.'

 

Will that do the trick????

 

Thanks for your interest:-D

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

UNBELIEVABLE YB have just phoned me with that joint bank account number. Can't quite believe they have but the guy on the phone was very wary of giving us it, Do you think they know whats coming.:D :D :D :D

 

Damn, just realised i'll have to retype my S.A.R. letters, bloody awkward YB.lol.

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well myself and my wife have just taken our first steps along the long road of reclaiming our bank charges. My wife took 3 S.A.R.s into our branch today, the first one was for my current account, the second was for my wifes and the third was for an old joint account we had. This might be overkill but we didn't want to give them any delaying excuses, espeicially with regards to the joint account. We got a reciept for the letters so its just a case of waiting for our statements now, wish us look;).

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you! Don't forget to keep the forum posted on your progress. :)

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference, the SAR applies to the person so you only needed 2.

  • Confused 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Caro and thanks for your responce. I know what you are saying is right, but, after reading quite a few threads on this fantastic site, and hearing how many people have struggled getting joint information, including myself, out of the banks (mostly delay tactics i might add) I just thought I would hit them with all 3 accounts separated. I suppose I was just trying to cover all bases from the off.

 

Thanks

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I see your point, they have a legal obligation to comply, and I think it is better to make sure that they meet that obligation, rather than letting them keep control. As long as you make sure that you do everything by the book, you can safely expect them to do the same.

 

Don't let them bully you before you start. You are taking control of the situation now on your terms.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...