Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cash Genie ongoing Saga


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4159 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, i have received a CCJ Claim form form Northampton County Court for a £150 payday loan i took out with Cash Genie which i could not afford to repay when it was due. I obviously owe the money and i want to sort it out but this claim form has large amounts of interest which take the amount due from £150 to £1052. The particulars on the claim form are:Deposited £150Charges £182Interest £720Payments £0Can they charge me this much interest when the term of the loan was only 30 days? Obviously i have a limited time to deal with this so any help would be greatly appreciated as i am unsure what to do next. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

nope they can only charge the loan sum [minus your repayments] + 1 months int

 

see the payday loans forum for posts by sillygirl1

 

the troops will be here tomorrow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies, how do i put up my POC in full? i have included the amounts quoted on it in my 1st post, what other info do you require? Am new to this and not particularly clever where computers are concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the specifics are the claimant is cash genie UK Limited. The total of the claim is £1052. The breakdown is Loan £150, Charges £182, Interest £720. Do you require any more information. Unfortunately i work nights so can only reply in the early hours. Some information on what i should do would be greatly appreciated as i need to reply to the claim form. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

d

 

should you wish to post them up

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Deeps.

 

Its not really needed, it just helps with the defence.

 

Firstly have you acknowledged the claim online, do so and tick you will be defending in full.

 

And then read and do the same as this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?315129-Bryan-Carter-and-PayDay-Express-court-papers%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

 

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi havinastella and thanks for your time. I have acknowledged receipt of the claim on line and in the defence box which allows for 122 words i have put "defending in full". Do i need to send a letter as per your link to Cash Genie? What happens next? Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done the CPR request and will post it recorded delivery on way home from work this morning. You have been a great help and feel a lot better that something has been done now. What happens next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, sorry for not posting recently but have been away. I have received a reply from the court saying the court is unable to treat my response as either a 'defence' or and 'admission' it says it has therefore been treated as and 'Acknowledgement of Service' which allows 28 days fromthe date of service for me to file a fully particulised defence. What am i to do now please???Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I recently posted a thread and received some very useful advice especially from havinastella. Thank you. Since my post i have received a letter from the court saying:

 

The court is unable to treat my response as either a 'defence' or and 'admission'.

 

My response has therefore been treatedas an 'acknowledgement of service' which allows 28 days from the date of service for you to file a fully particularised defence.

 

I have been away so am not sure how long i have to file a defence and what i should do next.

 

I would appreciate any help please.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence is as follows (this is a particularlised one as their claim is faulty, you don't need 'legal' stuff here - they have lost four times so far this year to CAG....

 

Number each paragraph when you cut and paste it.

 

I xxx, dob xxx am the defendant in this case. The particulars of claim are vague and misleading and cite no cause for legal action. I am a litigant in person with no recourse to legal help and any costs in this case should be borne by either side.

 

History of loan

On xxx date I borrowed XXX from XXX company, this company is a payday loan company and has a very high interest rate, the amount was due to be repaid on xxx.

 

I made xxx in 'rollover' payments, these being the required amount to let the loan be repaid at a later date. (List any repayments with dates of repayment and have your backup info in order).

 

On xxx date I communicated with the company and let them know I was experiencing financial difficulties and tried to come to an arrangement with them (list the correspondence trail - very important this)

 

The company were also sent a CPR letter on xxx date - although under Section 87 of the CCA Act they do not need to send a default letter as the loan has automatically defaulted by not being repaid at the end of the initial term. They have yet to respond.

 

The interest claim of XXX for a £150 loan does not make any sense, there is no interest rate quoted and their current terms and conditions cite an interest rate of XXX. This is way beyond the recognisded 'high' threshold of 35%. It is a short term loan and the company are trying to unjustly enrich themselves by this vexatious and litigatious claim.

 

I therefore request that this case goes to mediation to discuss the interest rate issue, and the fees loaded onto the account. There is no legal basis for them to charge this XXX in interest on such a small sum, the claim amount is enough for them to instigate bankruptcy should they wish, and is prejudicial to other creditors.

 

It is difficult to do a fully particularlised claim for this as the particulars give no cause for action, no letter before action has been received and I have been trying to communicate with the company to schedule a repayment program since xxx. There is little legislation available for this type of loan, and the main method of repayment is usually the original loan sum and one months interest.

 

I therefore ask the court to put this forward for mediation, or to strike the claim out on the grounds that the particulars of claim are vague and misleading and the interest claimed is unjust given the low initial sum.

 

Should the court require the company to amend their particulars of claim I wish to be able to amend this defence accordingly.

 

The above is a statement of truth by xxxxx.

 

That should do for a defence for this lot, the courts know you can't do a 'properly particularlised claim' for this anyway and as stated Cash Genie have caved in at mediation, they also have discontinued several cases and other cases have been struck out by the courts themselves once you point out the particulars are iffy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the defence to the court, do not bother about sending it to Cash Genie, you can send it to their legal lot - who is representing them by the way? Then sit back, the court will then transfer the case to a court nearer you and then allocation questionaires will go out, you fill yours out and send it back and I bet CG won't do theirs (it costs them £80 (I think)... not worth it for a £150 loan!).

 

Don't let them get judgement by default (which ought to be scrapped IMHO).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, update so far,

 

i received the CPR letter from Cash Genie on 9 Sep, their letter dated 7 Sep.

It states that as it is a small claims issue CPR Part 31 does not apply.

 

However in order to assist me in my defence they have enclosed the following:

 

My credit agreement, signed electronically,

a copy of their standard terms and conditions of business,

breakdown of my account and copy of default notice dated 28 July 2011.

 

I forwarded my defence to Northampton CC as kindly written by sillygirl1

and have now received documents from my local court which need returning ASAP.

 

It is an allocation questionnaire to be completed by myself basically asking:

A. Settlement - do i wish to use the free small claims mediation service provided by HMCS to help settle my claim with the other party.

B. Location of Hearing - Straightforward happy with that.

C. Track - Do i agree the small claims track is most suitable for claim - happy with that.

 

The rest of the form i am happy with too.

 

Do you think there is anything else i should do at this stage and am i going to have to pay all of the £1052 they are claiming for a £150 loan.

 

I am more than happy to pay the £150 and some small costs but the rest seems way excessive, getting bit nervous now.

 

Any advice from you good people out there?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As dx said in post #2, they can only claim the original loan, less any payments you have made and 1 months interest so forget about £1000 plus amounts.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes to mediation and Yes to the small claims. You won't have to pay anywhere nnear the amount they are asking, in other cases they have given up at this stage, or caved in during mediation, you don't file a fee for the AQ, get it back today if possible, and mention to the court they claim the CPR rules don't apply, they DO apply to small claims.

 

When you send the AQ to the court send a copy of the letter they sent you stating CPR rules don't apply - the court would be interested in this document, you don't need to send the other documents (although it might help if you do - ask the court if you need to).

 

Keep us informed of the progress.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sillygirl1 you have been an absolute star, cant thank you enough and everyone else who has helped here. All documents returned to my local court and now awaiting a reply. Will keep you updated and thanks again everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, just realised it was the AQ form you have done - I wouldn't mind betting that they do not file theirs in time - if at all (its been known in both instances).

 

If this happens ask the court for an automatic strike out on grounds of abuse of process by the claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...