Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ESA Assessment? So soon after being given Indefinite


Deb T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

3yr Incapacity/Severe Disablement was up in December last year. The original decision to first get that 3yr entitlement was first to not grant it, then it went to appeal and it given on appeal.

 

The three years were up in December 2011, and after a letter from the GP and a new form filled in it was given as 'Indefinite' in February this year.

 

What has now been received last week Sept 24th is an assessment for Employment and Support Allowance letter where they first want to call to 'talk' about how the changes will affect the claimant and then they want to send a questionnaire called Limited Capability for Work.

 

I assume this is the prequel to an ATOS medical etc?

 

Am I right to think that A/ It's pot luck who gets 'assessed' for ESA first? Just seems a bit odd that less than 8 months after being granted Indefinite re disability that they are now having to go through what appears like it all over again but with a different set of questions/criteria and ones which seem steeped against the individual.

 

Is the above unusual or standard?

 

--

 

Also, they want to speak to the claimant on the phone, this is something the claimant won't do, they don't talk on the phone at any point, one part of their illness is extreme issues where others are concerned, is there a way around this? I don't see the claimant ever speaking to them on the phone, what would be the next step?

 

More to come but for now this is it.

 

PS: Recently had to apply for a Blue Badge, this involved having to send a rather elongated form in (most of which did not require filling in due to Higher Rate Mobility aware, but still they wanted a plethora of 'documents' . Finally awarded at a cost of £10 ...

 

Any clues/ideas/way forward would be much appreciated.

Edited by Deb T
spelling

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deb T:

 

Eighteen months into incapacity/severe disablement reassessment it appears that Jobcentreplus have neither rhyme nor reason as to their priorities for reassessment. Some claimants are being called at the end of a recommended period before reassessment. For the rest it is indeed pot luck.

 

Practicalities;

 

No-one, the claimant, you or anyone else, has to take a phone call from Jobcentreplus if they don't want to. Tis my personal choice to only speak to them on the phone when it suits me, and that's not very often! In your particular circumstances they'll try once or twice before giving up and sending an ESA50 questionnaire. Atos may want to arrange a face to face assessment by phone. Again, if you don't answer they'll simply give up and write to you instead.

 

Among the stickies on the benefit forum there's an excellent guide by :leemack: to completing the first part of an ESA50 form. Unfortunately, :leemack: wasn't able to complete the second part but Rethink's site has a guide to coping with the questions about cognition and mental health.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Margaret, thankyou for that,

 

So, let me try to clarify, there is no obligation for a person to speak with Atos/Jobcentre Plus on the phone and by not doing so they're not damaging any future assessment? (ok, as far as can be ascertained that is) and notwithstanding that simply by virtue of them not speaking to ATOS/Jobcentre they will simply send the form which out.

 

I have no idea as to why they'd want to speak to a claimant on the phone other than A/ To check they have a contact/route in to the claimant and B/ Because they have supposed stress monitors/lie detecting equipment (flawed as they are, I know because I've watched Jeremy Kyle haha) and want to try and fail the claimant even before it gets to the assessment stage.

 

It is on file with docs/ psychiatrist/ that the claimant has a problem, a real problem with phones, this was documented way before any claim for any benefits was ever made?

 

and it's been just 8 months, not 18 months since a reassessment for disabilty took place and where indefinite was granted.

Edited by Deb T

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Hiya Deb T:

 

No obligation whatsoever for anyone to take a call from Atos or Jobcentreplus. :biggrin: I'm in the middle of reassessment. Two days after I'd ignored a second call an ESA50 questionnaire dropped through the letterbox. Just look out for the ESA50 in case it gets lost by Royal Mail.

 

Officially, the reason for phone calls is a new caring, sharing, face from Jobcentreplus. Make of that what you wish. Some claimants are happy, but many aren't, to accept the decision about their entitlement to employment and support allowance via phone because decision makers sometimes ask if there's any extra info to be submitted in support of the claim. Ignore the decision maker? If there's a real chance of extra evidence affecting the outcome of a claim Jobcentreplus will send a letter (think it's an IBM270) asking for it.

 

Was the February 12 reassessment for disability living allowance rather than incapacity/severe disablement?

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Margaret, Now you've mentioned it and after checking yes the Feb 12 was for DLA the rest just continued on from the original claim made 3 years 8 months ago.

 

Can you clarify what you mean by decisions made over the phone etc? Jobcentreplus phone you to 'identify you' but nothing in that phone call will stop them from sending you the ESA50 form will it?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deb T:

 

Was talking about the eventual decision to award, or not award, employment and support allowance being notified to the claimant by phone before Jobcentreplus sends written confirmation.

 

Almost all reassessment claimants, whether or not, the initial phone call is answered get sent an ESA50, unless there's a change of circumstances; hospital inpatient, terminal illness, etcetera, for which alternative documentation is required.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Couple of quick questions.

 

 

 

1:/ They give a date to send the form back by, it will be a few days late and I mean a few. Due tomorrow but wont be able to send it until Monday due to the person having a few rough days of late and not really up for going through the last part of the form. Will a few days late mean they'll get snotty? really don't fancy phoning them up having to explain to them.

 

2:/ Also, is it worth enclosing a letter from a Consultant Psychiatrist who in their opinion deems the patient unfit for work for the foreseeable future (doctor has been away abroad so have been unable to contact them to do the same...which they would if they were available) Or should the Shrinks letter be held back ...I base this on the notion that they appear not to even read the form sent in but simply head straight to the 'medical assessement' route almost by default.

 

3:/ I have read Leemacks excellent guide to filling the form in, was there another part to come as in the mental health part or did something happen? also, is Leemacks guide still applicable?

 

Also, the declaration is a bit 'catch all' isn't it? almost as if they want you to give them the ability to contact anyone at any time and for any reason and that anything you send them they can farm out to whomever.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of quick questions.

 

 

 

1:/ They give a date to send the form back by, it will be a few days late and I mean a few. Due tomorrow but wont be able to send it until Monday due to the person having a few rough days of late and not really up for going through the last part of the form. Will a few days late mean they'll get snotty? really don't fancy phoning them up having to explain to them.

 

Firstly, from what you say later, the claim is in relation to mental health in which case there is no comeback if the form is not returned at all. In any case, by the time ATOS realise it hasn't been returned and let the DWP know and then the DWP get around to do something about it, it will have been returned so no problem again.

 

2:/ Also, is it worth enclosing a letter from a Consultant Psychiatrist who in their opinion deems the patient unfit for work for the foreseeable future (doctor has been away abroad so have been unable to contact them to do the same...which they would if they were available) Or should the Shrinks letter be held back ...I base this on the notion that they appear not to even read the form sent in but simply head straight to the 'medical assessement' route almost by default.

Any medical evidence you already have should be enclosed with the form though you're right in that it probably won't be read. They don't even appear to read the bit about special arrangements you might need to attend the assessment. However, don't delay sending back the form waiting for evidence as it can always be taken to the assessment where it's possibly more likely to be read.

 

3:/ I have read Leemacks excellent guide to filling the form in, was there another part to come as in the mental health part or did something happen? also, is Leemacks guide still applicable?

The guide is still applicable. Unfortunately the mental health part is on hold due to illness.

 

Also, the declaration is a bit 'catch all' isn't it? almost as if they want you to give them the ability to contact anyone at any time and for any reason and that anything you send them they can farm out to whomever.

 

Hope this helps.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: DebT:

 

Rethink's site has a useful factsheet about the work capability assessments. Includes the descriptors for mental health issues and a guide to answering the questions for activities 11 - 17 on an ESA50.

 

The space for explaining a late return is on page 19.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...