Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
    • That may be your personal claimed experience I said i didn't want smart meters - you jumped in to recommend smart meters I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest paying what I owe every month I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest a variable tariff - even if its one that only varies on a daily basis rather than half/hourly - with prices higher in winter when you need it and lowest in summer when you need it least   politeness ends with: - I'm NOT interested in any smart tariff I see, You are pushing your smart meter + variable tariffs in the wrong place - try pushing them somewhere 'nearer to home'  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creation Car finance agreement - dealer forged my sig, was cabot now lowells chasing


angelai
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2521 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am looking for some advice/opinions...

 

In January 2011 I purchased a car with finance provided by creation.

The price of the car was £2995, I paid a cash deposit of £800.

I was made aware of charges/fees totalling £450 (ish), which would be added to the finance agreement.

 

All was going fine until around 6 months ago, when a change of bank account led me to registering for online account management (so that I could arrange continuing payments).

 

The amount outstanding didn't appear to be correct so I contacted the company and requested all of the relevant figures.

It turned out that the set-up/admin fees had been added twice,

the representative I spoke to said that the dealer was wrong to add these fees at the point of sale as they are always added afterwards.

 

A rather in-depth conversation led to me being informed that creation don't actually hold any physical paperwork, and that they would be unable to amend the loan amount without notification from the dealer.

 

After some detective work I managed to locate the dealer

(who had now leased his forecourt to someone else, but I found him in the end!).

 

I explained the situation, and asked for a copy of our original sales document.

A week of telephone calls and me harrassing him brought no joy.

 

He told me that all of his paperwork was in storage and that he'd been unable to locate the document.

Well, of course he couldn't find it

- it would prove that he had actually received £450 more than he should have from creation, which they would obviously want back!

For me, the actual cost of the £450 would be much greater due to the associated interest.

 

Fortunately,

I did find my copy of the sales document, and emailed creation again,

informing them that I had a physical, SIGNED document showing the correct amount.

 

I explained that I would be happy to send them a COPY, not the original

- this was all the proof I had, it wasn't going to be lost in the post!

They did not reply.

 

On to the more pressing concern now...

during all of this I noticed that creation had the wrong registration number for the vehicle.

 

I informed them of this, without giving them the correct number.

Again, they were unable to amend the details without verification from the dealer.

 

I sent a final email informing them that this needed to be corrected (as did the loan amount) as I was hoping to sell the vehicle, with their permission of course.

 

I was hoping that this would set alarm bells ringing for them

- the vehicle did technically belong to them.

No joy.

 

after a couple more months,

it became apparent that the car was going to need a lot of money spent on it

- which I didn't have.

 

I did a hpi check and, surprise, it showed no outstanding finance.

So I traded it for another car at a local dealership.

 

I now find myself in no position to continue with repayments

- I am just setting up a debt managemnt plan,

and have just been visited by bailiffs

and had to agree a repayment plan with them

(which I can't afford, but will have to find if I want to keep my possessions obviously!).

 

I am in this position through my own actions

- I was earning a good salary until a year ago but had to give up the job.

This really is no-one's fault but my own.

 

My question is this - what can creation do to me?

I no longer have the car so they can't repossess it.

 

Actually, I NEVER had the car with the registration number they hold,

although the make and model are correct.

 

I am willing to come to some arrangement with them if they will accept a much reduced payment,

my concern is that they won't accept it and I have sold a car which didn't belong to me

. But then, it didn't belong to them either maybe?

 

I know I shouldn't have sold the car, but in my defence I did inform them of the mistakes with the agreement.

The only document I have ever signed is the original purchase order with the dealer (which he can't find).

 

Any ideas?!

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi, can someone please help - I don't know what steps I should take next:

 

I sent a CCA request regarding an old agreement.

A copy of the 'original' agreement has arrived today

- with a forged signature!

It is most definitely NOT my signature, although it is a good attempt.

 

I never signed a credit agreement, that is why I sent the CCA request.

 

There are other issues

- the registration number of the vehicle I bought is incorrect,

as is the purchase price

- both issues were reported to the finance company at the time.

 

At this point, though,

I am more concerned with the fact that someone has had the audacity to forge my signature!

 

There must be a process I need to follow,

but I have no idea where to start.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

merged with you old thread from 2012.

 

so the dealer forged your sig then,

this must be close to being SB'd too!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what prompted the sending of the CCA request

 

 

have cabot been sending threat-o-grams then?

 

 

tell us what has happened between your 1st post and today that has prompted you to CCA?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account is now with Lowells Solicitors

- they sent a 'final notice before court action' type letter..

. There may have been many other letters which were never opened (head buried in sand moments).

 

I haven't been paying this debt,

and I haven't acknowledged it.

 

 

Because of the issues with the account

(as my original post - incorrect details, no satisfactory response from Creation regarding these details)

I just didn't pay it

- I know that's not the best course of action,

but I've had many other things to worry about over the last 5 years.

 

I think the problem was always the cowboy that sold me the car.

He was more than a little surprised when I found him in 2012!

Funnily enough, I've seen a FB post very recently about him, and it wasn't a good review.

 

In summary

- I am in possession of the original purchase order,

showing the correct vehicle registration number and purchase price.

 

 

I have not made a payment on this account since 2012

(according to the statement I received today

- I'm sure it was longer ago than that, though).

 

 

I have not opened any letters about this account for years

- but that's not to say I didn't get any.

 

 

I am angry that I seem to have been 'done', and yes,

I'm trying to not pay it for that reason.

 

 

The CCA request was made because I KNEW they did not hold a signed agreement,

because I never signed one,

and I need to show I have tried to resolve this before it goes to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like the OP paid until about feb 2012 [1st post]

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and you did the very best thing by not paying!!

 

pers i'd let this run

 

if you do get a claimform

then comeback here.

if casbot has sold it to lowells.

 

that means its definitely a lemon debt.

 

cabot are bottom feeders

Lowell don't usually deal in debts cabot has had

so i'd sit on your hand

which might have been a better thing to do

unless you've moved since you took this out

then the CCA was a good Idea as they now have the correct address

and cant get a backdoor CCJ.

 

the fact that its fraud and you have proof will KILL any court claim dead.

 

don't worry

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your input, it is appreciated!

 

Yes, I have moved - and changed my name (first name by deed poll, surname by marriage). Letters are still addressed in my old name. They found me somehow - not sure how? I had already changed my name by the time I moved...

 

Do I need to do anything about this fraudulent signature? Should I respond, pointing that out? Report it somewhere?

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go read post 10

 

 

as long as you've CCA'd from your current address you do nothing more

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...