Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Comet LG TV problem


Hugster Alive
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi people,

Hoping you could offer me some advice. Anything appreciated.

I discovered on Friday that my 50” Plasma LG 50PJ550 purchased from a Comet store 18 months ago was no longer working. It has the following problem:

When I tried to switch the LG 50PJ550 on with either the remote control ormanually on the LG 50PJ550 itself the red standby light goes outand the LG 50PJ550 tries to illuminate briefly then goesback to standby mode and then tries to switch on again then switches off. There is also some loud clicking when this ishappening therefore I believe the unit as faulty.

Just going on random AV forums would suggest there is an inherrent problem with this model and the exact same symptons and diagnosis. LG support believes the unitis faulty and their diagnosis based on our transcript leads them to believe itis the power supply board within the TV. Coincidentally, this was also Comet's diagnosis over the phone yesterday. LG also stated in transcript that from asupport perspective they have had this very same issue reported previously. Given that both LG and Comet's initialanalysis suggests a problem within the TV I would want this problemdealt with by the retailer.

LG also stated that as it was out of warranty by 6 months that it would be at a chargeable cost. I have directly approached Comet and said that under the Sale of GoodsAct 1979 makes it an implied term that goods be as described, of satisfactoryquality, free of flaws and made from durable materials to last a reasonablelength of time. As they are in breach of thisI am entitled by my statutory rights to have the LG 50PJ550 repaired at no cost,replaced or a full refund given.

They have responded by saying that they would inspect it at a cost of £69.00 as in agreement with Trading Standards. Citizens Advice state that my statutory rights are such that I should have it repaired at no cost.

I'm not sure where to go with this but am mooting the idea of small claims court. Any suggestions? I have sent them a recorded letter today with 14 days response required as to their actions.

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to the site.

As you will have read,Comet have a shocking history of dealing with customer complaints.

The AV forums are a good authority for identifying whether there are common faults.

Funnily enough I had an older set to yours and also had exactly the same problem.

I ended up replacing the PCB myself since I bought the TV cheap second hand-it was worth fixing.

If you are up for a small claims action,then wait and see how they respond to your LBA.

Get together all supporting papertrail etc.

It will not be a complex or expensive route to go down.

Comet need to be shown that they cannot continue to get away with this treatment of consumers.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Soga. Use it , love it.

 

If they dont adhere to statute law, then its time to take them to court.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although you shouldn’t have to do this but it might save you a lot of time, money and the hassle of dealing with Comet by repairing it yourself if you’re confident with a soldering iron. I’m not 100% sure but I think the issue with the PJ550 series TV’s was down to either one or two failed resistors on the power supply board. There is a thread on the av forums site which goes into detail about this issue and a number of people have repaired it themselves for as little as a couple of quid. You could even try an independent TV repairer if you don’t feel confident.

 

I had a nasty experience myself with Comet a couple of years ago before they got into difficulty and my TV was in warrantee. I would brace yourself for a fight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no real need to do it yourself, when statute law says that Comet must refund or replace it, no questions asked.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then take legal action and get compensation too. Plus press coverage. Could always notify watchdog too. I'm pretty sure theyd be interested when they investigate and find that hundreds, if not thousands of people are being missold policies and comet are ignoring the law.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sale of Goods Act 1974(as amended) states that for the first six months after purchase, if anything goes wrong then that fault is assumed to have been there at purchase and it is up to the seller to prove otherwise.

After six months, it is then up to the buyer to prove there was an inherent fault with it. You can only do this by paying for an engineers report. If that report show there is an inherent fault, then the seller must repair or replace at his discretion and refund the engineers report.

 

You should get an independent to examin it and not the seller, especially if that is Comet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hug ,

 

I agree with Conniff here an independent report will show the issue is an inherent fault as in the Components failing in the Power Supply which johny mentions in his post as being the cause of the fault with the Tv which he is 100% correct .

 

Best leaving this repair to the experts and hopefully COMET will stump up one way or another after the Tv has been examined independently .

 

 

Regarding the post from rene ,

 

when statute law says that Comet must refund or replace it, no questions asked

 

 

That may well be the theory but the practice would show this does not happen going by the number of unresolved posts in the COMET Threads here on CAG that would confirm this .

Edited by GorgieBoy

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies people

 

A question then on soga. Comet responded today after I quoted soga by stating they would examine the TV for any defects at a cost of £69.00 as in agreement with Trading Standards. This charge seems to be the norm with Comet. Is this reasonable or should I stick with my soga stance which is basically 'You're in the wrong by law, the unit hasn't lasted a reasoble length of time and I'm not paying a penny for something that cost a fortune and lasted 6 months past it's warranty period'

 

Or should I pay the £69.00, leave it in their hands? Citizens Advice suggested I pay the £69.00 and claim back but it kind of feels like I'm giving into their demands in a way.

 

Just how are my kids going to get their daily dose of In The Night Garden???

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up yo you.

If you are prepared to pay the fee and wait.

Make sure that you put it in writing that you will be claiming the fee back along with associated costs later.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay for it ?

There is no time limit on a s75 claim.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok.

There was a case a while ago similar to yours but I think it was a laptop.

Comet would not budge.The OP ended up getting a written repair estimate which I think cost about £20 as it was an expert witness one.

In that case also Comet had wanted him to pay £55 I think.

In the end they caved in and sorted it and also paid the £20 he had paid for the report.

It was a hairsbreadth away from an N1.

Will see if I can find it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin very helpful,

I have rung around local TV repair shops and I have been quoted £25.00 for an independant Engineers report to identify the fault. Now Comet want £69.00 for their own engineers report. Would it then make sense to go with my option and then present it to Comet or would they still insist on their own analysis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it your way.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they will insist on following "Their own Policy"

Obtaining your own report would obviously be more favourable to you in the event that you filed a small clams action.(Which would be a route if they were presented with your own report and failed to resolve matters)

It is reasonable to assume that a report done by them would have some vested interest if you see what I mean ?

 

Before filing a claim,you would be expected to have given them the op to resolve your complaint.

It would seem to be the right course to get an indi report for £25 and put it to them.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like others have said it would be better to have the TV inspected by an independent rather than Comet or whoever they want to look at it. £69 is quite steep for a written report and there is a good chance it will state the fault is down to “wear and tear” and not a manufacturing defect. Then you’re down another £69 and still no further forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi There,

 

Reading your story and found it very interesting and am wondering where you have got to and whether your TV is now fixed.

 

My TV,exact same model seems to have the same issues,it tries to switch on,clicks,the red LED goes on and then it switches off. V frustrating.

 

I'm thinking the best and quickest solution will be to contact a local TV engineer.

 

What do you think and where have you got too??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...