Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pension advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there can you help with this please,

I have contacted a financial adviser to have a look at my existing plan with Scottish widows,

he told me that the plan i have is not very good as it is a with profits plan and is dead in the water,

he has advised me to switch it to another company which has a fully managed fund and would be better than what i have just now.

 

How can i be sure he is acting in my best interests and not his own,

 

thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could always get a second opinion with another financial advice company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Have you had a proper report from the adviser with an assessment of your current plan and reasons for switching?

 

We can't give investment advice here, but I would say to you that with profits and managed funds can be very different. You need to understand the risks and rewards involved and make an informed decision if you do change, otherwise you could be unhappy later.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

not had a proper report yet,

he is bringing that next week.

 

Would the fully managed one be better or about the same as the one i have?

 

He said the new one is based on my attitude to risk.

i suppose from that the new one is a bit of a risk,

but will decide when i see his paper work,

 

he said the one i have is not earning much and that i should switch

as S/W do not let you move to a new plan with them if you have an existing one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, not had a proper report yet, he is bringing that next week. Would the fully managed one be better or about the same as the one i have? He said the new one is based on my attitude to risk. So i suppose from that the new one is a bit of a risk, but will decide when i see his paper work, he said the one i have is not earning much and that i should switch as S/W do not let you move to a new plan with them if you have an existing one.

 

Hello again.

 

As I said, we're not authorised here to give investment advice. Personally I wouldn't have a meeting without seeing the report first and having time to consider it, but it's up to you.

 

I'll try to find you some reading, because managed funds and with profit funds don't behave the same way. Could you tell us if you have a ' unitised' with profits plan with Scottish Widows please?

 

I would also check out what you can and can't do with Scottish Widows about fund-switching if you think it's right for you, you can ring them yourself. And do you remember why you took out the plan at the time? Were you happy with it then?

 

The adviser should define what he means by 'not earning very much' so you can, as I said before, make an informed decision.

 

If I may say, you haven't been told enough to decide what is the best way for you to go and I'm not feeling very comfortable about how this is going so far. But I'm really pleased you've asked us. :)

 

Can you tell us which insurance/investment company is being suggested as an alternative to SWF, or haven't you been told yet?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also depends on your age and if you have company pension as well?

If below 40 you may be able to accept some risk on how the plan is managed and investments made.

As you know not many making profits at the moment, but who knows in 10years time?

Get a forecast from SW if do not alresdy have one.

Also new plans are usually weighted up front on management fees/costs.

LOt of info on line, suggest you do a bit of research!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry folks should have explained before, I have five years to go before I retire, the policy I have just now started in 1989 opted out of goverment state pension, not paid into it apart from tax & ins relief,

 

Hello again and thank you for elaborating.

 

With 5 years to go, you should definitely think hard about whether you want investments/funds that are volatile or stable and predictable, like with profits used to be or maybe still is.

 

Do you think you'll be able to do some research or talk to other advisers?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to jump in here, switching 5yrs before retirement is risky as any fees in switching have to be made up and also any loss incurred in those 5 yrs with risky funds also have to be made up.

 

Yes with profits funds are often very steady away and may not have performed amazingly well but also they will not offer very much risk.

 

I am concerned that the adviser mentioned said that you cant switch funds with Scottish Widows, this is simply not true as we do this for clients with Scottish Widows all the time. With the limited info I have and without wanting to presume anything you need to ask a few questions.

 

- How much is the fee to transfer over?

- Is the commission being taken upfront or over a time period (usually 4/5 yrs) The latter over a time period will end up costing you more.

- How much is the renewal fee on the pension plan?

 

You may also want to put in a call to Scottish Widows yourself and ask if you can switch funds if you want to just to confirm. and ask them what the fees for the plan are.

 

If the adviser is switching to generate fees then you want to be careful as you may be paying for something you dont need. Of course he may well be offering a much better cheaper plan which can only be done be switching pensions but so far I am dubious...

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you opted out,

your state pension will be reduced by a considerable amount for that.

 

I did that for a few years,

but was advised to opt back in asap as you would not make up what you loose.

( I lost £50/week for just a few years out )

 

I think it would unwise to switch now as the costs of setting up will be too high,

you doont want to take any risks this late in the day IMO.

 

In fact I would be looking at converting your annuity to a pension now

and looking at thise options, including taking the tax free cash element.

 

You realy do have to shop around to get the best deal.

 

Your IFA should be giving you these options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks thanks for all your comments gives me a lot of info to ask the FA.

 

I did speak to S/ widows who said that I could keep my pension with them

but move it to a new plan with them

will have to sort that out with thr FA

and ask why he said I could not do this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my meeting with F/A today,

the fee to transfer over is £925.00,

the renewal fee is half a percent.

 

After talking to S/W last week the person i spoke to did say the plan i have at the moment was dead in the water

and that i could not put any funds into this plan

and offered a stakeholder pension,

and if i wanted to move to something else i would have to use a F/A as the pension pot is over £10,000.

 

On paper the plan being offered looks better than what i have at the moment, the new plan is with Scottish Life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I'm not totally sure of what's going on here, but please bear in mind that we're not authorised to give advice here. I'm confused about what Scottish Widows have said, I have to say.

 

My inclination would be to get at least one more independent opinion.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have I see in a post 5 years to go -forget it those funds take years to be any good, do not make my mistake years ago, managed funds seem in the past o.k. if a very long time to run, not short time. and you may have a written guarantee written in yours at the moment,

 

Give you an idea, my pension ex company was a section 32, after 1st 3 years no annual funds added due to the economy, so the asset stayed the same for 20+ years, luckily I had it written in the contracT (make sure if you have = a guarantee), and the Insurance company had to honour the pension amount, otherwise it would be about half of what it is now I understand.

 

 

Be careful here. Just a warning, to be honest I wish I never left the old company pension scheme as I would be better off and allowed to retire earlier than I did.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my meeting with F/A today, the fee to transfer over is £925.00, the renewal fee is half a percent. After talking to S/W last week the person i spoke to did say the plan i have at the moment was dead in the water and that i could not put any funds into this plan and offered a stakeholder pension, and if i wanted to move to something else i would have to use a F/A as the pension pot is over £10,000. On paper the plan being offered looks better than what i have at the moment, the new plan is with Scottish Life.

 

 

Stakeholder, once you hit 55 years old I found I could not increase pension payments to a fund I was contributing to, but could take out a stakeholder pension for say £10.00 a month the figure I wanted to increase the old pension,, (Gordon Browns idea that one)

 

Great I get £111.00 less tax every 6 months. It is a minefield, and seems to me that the only people winning are the suppliers and advisers.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I have a private pension that i'm looking to get access to this year,

I had a financial adviser set this up for me a few years back and they have contacted me to give advice on how best to deal with it to my benefit,

I have been told this will cost around £1,500 for the privilege,

would this be the going rate or should I shop around,

 

Any advice welcome thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try talking to TPAS, the free pensions advice service.

I believe they merged with Pensions Wise, who I would also have suggested.

 

Hopefully they can tell you if your case is complicated enough to warrant spending £1500 on advice.

 

If you decide to shop around after that, there's a website that helps you find IFAs, independent advisors locally.

 

Maybe speak to TPAS and let us know how it goes?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged...

you are over 60yrs now?, there should be no penalty or need to pay anyone anything?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension??

only deal with the state pension,

 

Thanks DX,

Would that include the financial adviser I spoke to?

as he is freelance,

or is he exempt from that rule.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension?? only deal with the state pension,

 

did you try TPAS honeybee suggested. are they limited to gov pensions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension?? only deal with the state pension,

 

Thanks DX, Would that include the financial adviser I spoke to? as he is freelance, or is he exempt from that rule.

 

Thanks

 

what rule?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you try TPAS honeybee suggested. are they limited to gov pensions?

i see they are together.

they dont seem to be limited to state pensions though, according to their site. '...We help resolve issues that you may have with public or private pension schemes or policies...' etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends on the size of the pot and what you intend to do about things.

 

If you go for a traditional pension at this point then you wont need to pay anyone anything.

 

If you want to take it out as cash the govt regs say that you should take advice if the pot is over £50k

but it is not compulsory to do so and different funds view this in different ways.

 

If it is your FA telling you this

then you are still being led a merry dance by someone who has profited from you for years.

 

Who is the pension co,

how big is the pot and waht do you want to do with the money.

 

The TPAS can advise on whether the rues of the scheme have been properly applied and whether you have paid the correct management fees

( your original posts made me wonder whether all this was spelt out properly at the time by your FA)

and also help resolve any issues that then arise should the advice you have been given over the years by the FA or any company you had money with be duff.

 

I have a private pension that i'm looking to get access to this year,

I had a financial adviser set this up for me a few years back and they have contacted me to give advice on how best to deal with it to my benefit,

I have been told this will cost around £1,500 for the privilege,

would this be the going rate or should I shop around,

 

Any advice welcome thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...