Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pension advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there can you help with this please,

I have contacted a financial adviser to have a look at my existing plan with Scottish widows,

he told me that the plan i have is not very good as it is a with profits plan and is dead in the water,

he has advised me to switch it to another company which has a fully managed fund and would be better than what i have just now.

 

How can i be sure he is acting in my best interests and not his own,

 

thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could always get a second opinion with another financial advice company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Have you had a proper report from the adviser with an assessment of your current plan and reasons for switching?

 

We can't give investment advice here, but I would say to you that with profits and managed funds can be very different. You need to understand the risks and rewards involved and make an informed decision if you do change, otherwise you could be unhappy later.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

not had a proper report yet,

he is bringing that next week.

 

Would the fully managed one be better or about the same as the one i have?

 

He said the new one is based on my attitude to risk.

i suppose from that the new one is a bit of a risk,

but will decide when i see his paper work,

 

he said the one i have is not earning much and that i should switch

as S/W do not let you move to a new plan with them if you have an existing one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, not had a proper report yet, he is bringing that next week. Would the fully managed one be better or about the same as the one i have? He said the new one is based on my attitude to risk. So i suppose from that the new one is a bit of a risk, but will decide when i see his paper work, he said the one i have is not earning much and that i should switch as S/W do not let you move to a new plan with them if you have an existing one.

 

Hello again.

 

As I said, we're not authorised here to give investment advice. Personally I wouldn't have a meeting without seeing the report first and having time to consider it, but it's up to you.

 

I'll try to find you some reading, because managed funds and with profit funds don't behave the same way. Could you tell us if you have a ' unitised' with profits plan with Scottish Widows please?

 

I would also check out what you can and can't do with Scottish Widows about fund-switching if you think it's right for you, you can ring them yourself. And do you remember why you took out the plan at the time? Were you happy with it then?

 

The adviser should define what he means by 'not earning very much' so you can, as I said before, make an informed decision.

 

If I may say, you haven't been told enough to decide what is the best way for you to go and I'm not feeling very comfortable about how this is going so far. But I'm really pleased you've asked us. :)

 

Can you tell us which insurance/investment company is being suggested as an alternative to SWF, or haven't you been told yet?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also depends on your age and if you have company pension as well?

If below 40 you may be able to accept some risk on how the plan is managed and investments made.

As you know not many making profits at the moment, but who knows in 10years time?

Get a forecast from SW if do not alresdy have one.

Also new plans are usually weighted up front on management fees/costs.

LOt of info on line, suggest you do a bit of research!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry folks should have explained before, I have five years to go before I retire, the policy I have just now started in 1989 opted out of goverment state pension, not paid into it apart from tax & ins relief,

 

Hello again and thank you for elaborating.

 

With 5 years to go, you should definitely think hard about whether you want investments/funds that are volatile or stable and predictable, like with profits used to be or maybe still is.

 

Do you think you'll be able to do some research or talk to other advisers?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to jump in here, switching 5yrs before retirement is risky as any fees in switching have to be made up and also any loss incurred in those 5 yrs with risky funds also have to be made up.

 

Yes with profits funds are often very steady away and may not have performed amazingly well but also they will not offer very much risk.

 

I am concerned that the adviser mentioned said that you cant switch funds with Scottish Widows, this is simply not true as we do this for clients with Scottish Widows all the time. With the limited info I have and without wanting to presume anything you need to ask a few questions.

 

- How much is the fee to transfer over?

- Is the commission being taken upfront or over a time period (usually 4/5 yrs) The latter over a time period will end up costing you more.

- How much is the renewal fee on the pension plan?

 

You may also want to put in a call to Scottish Widows yourself and ask if you can switch funds if you want to just to confirm. and ask them what the fees for the plan are.

 

If the adviser is switching to generate fees then you want to be careful as you may be paying for something you dont need. Of course he may well be offering a much better cheaper plan which can only be done be switching pensions but so far I am dubious...

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you opted out,

your state pension will be reduced by a considerable amount for that.

 

I did that for a few years,

but was advised to opt back in asap as you would not make up what you loose.

( I lost £50/week for just a few years out )

 

I think it would unwise to switch now as the costs of setting up will be too high,

you doont want to take any risks this late in the day IMO.

 

In fact I would be looking at converting your annuity to a pension now

and looking at thise options, including taking the tax free cash element.

 

You realy do have to shop around to get the best deal.

 

Your IFA should be giving you these options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks thanks for all your comments gives me a lot of info to ask the FA.

 

I did speak to S/ widows who said that I could keep my pension with them

but move it to a new plan with them

will have to sort that out with thr FA

and ask why he said I could not do this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my meeting with F/A today,

the fee to transfer over is £925.00,

the renewal fee is half a percent.

 

After talking to S/W last week the person i spoke to did say the plan i have at the moment was dead in the water

and that i could not put any funds into this plan

and offered a stakeholder pension,

and if i wanted to move to something else i would have to use a F/A as the pension pot is over £10,000.

 

On paper the plan being offered looks better than what i have at the moment, the new plan is with Scottish Life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I'm not totally sure of what's going on here, but please bear in mind that we're not authorised to give advice here. I'm confused about what Scottish Widows have said, I have to say.

 

My inclination would be to get at least one more independent opinion.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have I see in a post 5 years to go -forget it those funds take years to be any good, do not make my mistake years ago, managed funds seem in the past o.k. if a very long time to run, not short time. and you may have a written guarantee written in yours at the moment,

 

Give you an idea, my pension ex company was a section 32, after 1st 3 years no annual funds added due to the economy, so the asset stayed the same for 20+ years, luckily I had it written in the contracT (make sure if you have = a guarantee), and the Insurance company had to honour the pension amount, otherwise it would be about half of what it is now I understand.

 

 

Be careful here. Just a warning, to be honest I wish I never left the old company pension scheme as I would be better off and allowed to retire earlier than I did.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my meeting with F/A today, the fee to transfer over is £925.00, the renewal fee is half a percent. After talking to S/W last week the person i spoke to did say the plan i have at the moment was dead in the water and that i could not put any funds into this plan and offered a stakeholder pension, and if i wanted to move to something else i would have to use a F/A as the pension pot is over £10,000. On paper the plan being offered looks better than what i have at the moment, the new plan is with Scottish Life.

 

 

Stakeholder, once you hit 55 years old I found I could not increase pension payments to a fund I was contributing to, but could take out a stakeholder pension for say £10.00 a month the figure I wanted to increase the old pension,, (Gordon Browns idea that one)

 

Great I get £111.00 less tax every 6 months. It is a minefield, and seems to me that the only people winning are the suppliers and advisers.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I have a private pension that i'm looking to get access to this year,

I had a financial adviser set this up for me a few years back and they have contacted me to give advice on how best to deal with it to my benefit,

I have been told this will cost around £1,500 for the privilege,

would this be the going rate or should I shop around,

 

Any advice welcome thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try talking to TPAS, the free pensions advice service.

I believe they merged with Pensions Wise, who I would also have suggested.

 

Hopefully they can tell you if your case is complicated enough to warrant spending £1500 on advice.

 

If you decide to shop around after that, there's a website that helps you find IFAs, independent advisors locally.

 

Maybe speak to TPAS and let us know how it goes?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged...

you are over 60yrs now?, there should be no penalty or need to pay anyone anything?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension??

only deal with the state pension,

 

Thanks DX,

Would that include the financial adviser I spoke to?

as he is freelance,

or is he exempt from that rule.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension?? only deal with the state pension,

 

did you try TPAS honeybee suggested. are they limited to gov pensions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I have spoken to pension wise they said they could not give advice on private pension?? only deal with the state pension,

 

Thanks DX, Would that include the financial adviser I spoke to? as he is freelance, or is he exempt from that rule.

 

Thanks

 

what rule?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you try TPAS honeybee suggested. are they limited to gov pensions?

i see they are together.

they dont seem to be limited to state pensions though, according to their site. '...We help resolve issues that you may have with public or private pension schemes or policies...' etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends on the size of the pot and what you intend to do about things.

 

If you go for a traditional pension at this point then you wont need to pay anyone anything.

 

If you want to take it out as cash the govt regs say that you should take advice if the pot is over £50k

but it is not compulsory to do so and different funds view this in different ways.

 

If it is your FA telling you this

then you are still being led a merry dance by someone who has profited from you for years.

 

Who is the pension co,

how big is the pot and waht do you want to do with the money.

 

The TPAS can advise on whether the rues of the scheme have been properly applied and whether you have paid the correct management fees

( your original posts made me wonder whether all this was spelt out properly at the time by your FA)

and also help resolve any issues that then arise should the advice you have been given over the years by the FA or any company you had money with be duff.

 

I have a private pension that i'm looking to get access to this year,

I had a financial adviser set this up for me a few years back and they have contacted me to give advice on how best to deal with it to my benefit,

I have been told this will cost around £1,500 for the privilege,

would this be the going rate or should I shop around,

 

Any advice welcome thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...