Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old GE money mortgage now Kensington - Arrears & Payment Arrangement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

since being in financial difficulty over the last few years

I have had dozens of £40 admin charges added to my account for making late payments.

I understand that I can claim these back

 

I have read other posts to see the procedure which is so helpful thank you,

 

Im just wondering how it would work as last year my account was taken over by Kensington Mortgages and if they refunded the admin charges where would the refund go

- woud it be sent to Kensignton to pay off the charges arrears balance?

 

Many thanks !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

you need to work out how much it all adds up to including interest on the charges (unlawful). If the debt was legally assigned to Kensington then you get the money from GE, it cant be just passed on to reduce your debt with another company although they will try that on if they even admit they owe you the refund

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I'm just starting a claim for £40 admin charges added over the years,

 

Ive been reading through threads tonight and just confused about the spreadsheet to use and what interest charge to put into the spreadsheet.

 

On the mortgage statements the interest rate varies from 2.95 up to 7.99% on the 2006 statements.

 

Also unclear if I should use the StatInt Sheet or the CISSheet.

 

At the end of each statement is says for example (annual statement 2009)

Interest Bearing Charges £1837.50

Additional Interest Incurred £213.88

Payment received towards these charges & Interest £125.54

 

So gathering from others posts and responses these additional charges are non reclaimable?

 

Sorry for posting when I'm sure this is all in here! Just want to make sure I get this right, as I usually get everything wrong! :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt you'll get penalty charges back out side of 6yrs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6yrs not months

you could try putting ALL of them on your sheet

see what they do??

 

stat int sheet [auto at 8%] as that will be more money than the CI at 2%

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Update: GE Money replied to me saying that since my mortgage was taken over by Kensington last year that they have closed the case and forwarded the complaint over Kensington.

 

I thought that as GE had charged the admin charges originally that the claim would be to them.

Question is do I trust that they have forwarded the claim to Kensington or do I resend the complaint again :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaxleeds,

the charges are for administration charges

- sometimes they charged £40 sometimes £50,

also some other charges like counselor visit?

 

I am advised these charges are way over the actual costs to them as a company and are therefore unlawful and can be reclaimed.

Probably better that one of the CAG experts explain it rather than me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

already tried but its not stuck in...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaxleeds, the charges are for administration charges - sometimes they charged £40 sometimes £50, also some other charges like counselor visit? I am advised these charges are way over the actual costs to them as a company and are therefore unlawful and can be reclaimed. Probably better that one of the CAG experts explain it rather than me!

 

 

Exactly the same situation as me then. Good luck!

 

 

dx - what have you tried to explain to me that 'hasn't stuck in' ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I have had a reply from Kensington in relation to my claim originally to GE Money (but then as the mortgage was taken over by Kensington the claim was redirected to Kensington).

 

They have offered as a gesture of goodwill to refund 9 Admin charges of £40.00 and one charge of £50.00. Totalling £410.00. There is no mention of compound interest but only am additional payment of £50 as they did not keep me informed of theprogress of the complaint as promised.

 

There are over 20 admin charges within the last 6 years of £40 and some £50, also a 'debt counselling' charge of £90.00, I need to put this all into the spreadsheet again but I think this adds up to with compound interest about £1400.00.

 

Can anyone advise me of the next action given that they have provided this response not including all unfair admin charges and not including and compound interest.

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

do as you've correctly stated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need for one

simply write back and demand the other charges back ONE line

inc spready

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do both

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Another reply from Kensington saying they have completed review of my complaint. Says their initial decision remains unchanged but they have amended the total fees which are to be refunded, "The additional fees and interest at 8% which you kindly detailed within your letter will not be considered"

 

I requested approx £1500 refund inc interest and they have offered £480 which they have already refunded to my account to reduce the arrears, also they have made a payment of £50 for distress and inconvenience into my bank account.

 

I'm not really happy with the response but i suppose its better than nothing as I suppose i am in arrears with them.

 

Anyway I just thought Id update this thread with the outcome, advice appreciated not sure if i should pursue this further

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd goto the FOS, you might not win but it will cost kennys a tidy sum in their investigation fee they get charged.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been following this as I had similar with Nemo and Rooftop etc, went to the FOS which was a complete waste of time as they basically told me that any charges like this are appropriate and acceptable.

 

was that an adjudicator or did you escalate to the ombudsman? As the charges arent appropriate or enforceable or even levied fairly. Thats why so many people are successful at reclaiming all of it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adjudicator dismissed my complaint initially about excessive charges

I

took advice from this excellent site and asked it to be sent to the Ombudsman who asked a few more questions and then agreed with the adjudicator.

 

I got the distinct impression that

a - they are swamped with complaints and

b-they don't really know what they are doing because of this.

 

Its only advice based on my issues but I wouldn't bother waiting the 18 months or so for the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...