Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

identity cards


firstship
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am annoyed that all EU countries with Identity Cards can use these as a passport for entry into the UK and yet UK citizens have to produce a Passport to leave and enter the UK.I am not suggesting we go to the expense of Identity Cards,but surely for any person from the EU to enter the UK they should have a passport

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have to say as a UK National and resident, I do not possess a Passport, yet I regularly travel within EU as part of my work and I only ever have to produce my Full UK driving Licence to do this. Only once was I asked if I had a Passport by Ryanair and when I stated no, they made a quick telephone and then allowed me to check in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I would get a kick in the rear from Alitalia, however, I NEVER stated that I travelled with all the airlines that fly to Europe, I have flown Ryanair, Air France and EasyJet without issue apart from the first time with Ryanair as stated above. As for the others, I have no idea. Though for anyone wishing to fly without a passport to Europe, I would recommend calling the relevant airline in advance to enquire if they would permit it, this way you do not encounter any problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
really is this possible fly to Europe only with driving licence ?

 

Perhaps I would get a kick in the rear from Alitalia, however, I NEVER stated that I travelled with all the airlines that fly to Europe, I have flown Ryanair, Air France and EasyJet without issue apart from the first time with Ryanair as stated above. As for the others, I have no idea. Though for anyone wishing to fly without a passport to Europe, I would recommend calling the relevant airline in advance to enquire if they would permit it, this way you do not encounter any problems.

 

It appears that you can, with some airlines, unless you are suggesting lightbulb117 is mistaken in their recollection of travelling on a driving licence.

I agree it would be wise to confirm it in advance with the airline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the issue will be proving you are a UK or EU national, which a driving licence does not do.

 

In the not too distant past you could easily travel back and forth to France on a ferry without once being asked for ID never mind an actual passport, which really bugged me after I'd paid out for emergency ones for my kids after booking a last minute holiday. We now have hours of queues at immigration (well, ten minutes at least!) whilst every passport is scanned and recorded, going both ways, and this is after providing ID info for both people and vehicles in advance.

 

If Ryanair or anyone else are really letting people travel on a driving licence, I for one find that quite worrying. I could have arrived in the UK yesterday (or any other EU country), swapped my licence for a UK/EU one next week and be freely travelling throughout the EU the week after if that were true.

 

How do you get around the advance passenger information thing? Doesn't that need a passport or identity card number?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I would get a kick in the rear from Alitalia, however, I NEVER stated that I travelled with all the airlines that fly to Europe, I have flown Ryanair, Air France and EasyJet without issue apart from the first time with Ryanair as stated above. As for the others, I have no idea. Though for anyone wishing to fly without a passport to Europe, I would recommend calling the relevant airline in advance to enquire if they would permit it, this way you do not encounter any problems.

 

Really???

 

International flights outside the EU - Valid passport only

International flights within the EU - Valid passport or national identity card *

Domestic flights (excluding UK) - Valid passport or national identity card *

Domestic flights UK - Valid passport or photographic I.D.

* not every country issues a national identity card

 

Please note: a driving licence does not represent a valid photographic ID, with the exception of UK domestic flights.

 

 

 

http://support.easyjet.com/case-4077

 

 

Im sorry lightbulb 117, but a uk driving licence is not suitable for travel within the EU, only on domestic flights staying within the uk. The uk NO longer has a national id card and a uk natioanl can NOT own a valid one as we do not make or issue them and any old ones are no longer valid, all we have is the passport.

 

 

 

As you can see below, we are opt outs and therefore, we require passports to travel. I would be VERY wary of travelling under the advice given by Lightbulb117. Im not saying he didnt, but it looks like that if stopped, you may have to produce or have a problem.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area

 

[/url]

Ireland and the United Kingdom were the only EU members which, prior to the 2004 enlargement, had not signed the Schengen Agreement. Both countries maintain a Common Travel Area with passport-free travel for their citizens between them and the three British Crown Dependencies of Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man, which are outside the European Union.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...