Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check and if I still am,  I am going to discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Travel Lodge - Speculative Invoice - photograph TL had proved it wasnt me **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'd really appreciate an update too (even though the thread is a few monhs old)

 

My daughter has just received the same letter as you, for an alleged £400 worth of damage to a wall on a one night stay at TravelLodge.

She is worried sick and says there was no damage caused by her, her partner, or the previous occupants.

 

 

We really need to know where to go with this.

 

 

 

Tara, was responding to a post on another thread.

 

quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Gazzaboy viewpost-right.png

Hi all,

 

Hopefully you will notice this reply. i have had further correspondance from CRS regarding their initial claim.

 

The basics of the letter, what i read from it were this.

 

1. Because i did not reply to the initial letter, therefor i do NOT intend to deny liability.

 

2. if i do not respond to discuss this case then then our client will have no option but to issue proceedings. seek to recover court fees etc etc.

 

3. And unless they here from me with my proposals for settlement they are instructed to refer it back to their client to commence with proceedings WITHOUT further notice to me.

 

So.... where do i go from here? i am tempted to ignore it again and see if any court papers turn up. Either that or to send a simple letter saying i did not recieve the initial letter of claim to drag it out?

 

Any more help would be greatly appreciated guys.

 

Gary

 

Link for the post above - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...g+claim%2Ffine

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its ok, the matter is partially resolved now, but I'd still like to add the info:

 

My daughter has just called the TravelLodge branch, and was told that a photograph of the alleged damage was on file (a small hole in the wall)

She then asked for a copy of the photograph, and the lady she spoke to said "I will need to check with my Manager if I can do that" My daughter then lost her cool and blew her top, demanding the photo to be mailed to her.

 

She was then called back, to be told that the damage had been flagged 1st June and that she was not liable since her stay was on the 3rd.

 

Make of this what you will, but my daughter is hopping mad and swears she will never stay with them again (she stays with them nationwide regularly) She is going to make a full 'no holds barred' complaint also.

 

I have to say that I find the whole situation very worrying; I do not use TL's myself, but as I plan to holiday overseas soon, I will ask for my room to be visually inspected before I go in there, and as I leave. I will also take dated photos of the room before I leave as back up.

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its ok, the matter is partially resolved now, but I'd still like to add the info:

 

My daughter has just called the TravelLodge branch, and was told that a photograph of the alleged damage was on file (a small hole in the wall)

She then asked for a copy of the photograph, and the lady she spoke to said "I will need to check with my Manager if I can do that" My daughter then lost her cool and blew her top, demanding the photo to be mailed to her.

 

She was then called back, to be told that the damage had been flagged 1st June and that she was not liable since her stay was on the 3rd.

 

Make of this what you will, but my daughter is hopping mad and swears she will never stay with them again (she stays with them nationwide regularly) She is going to make a full 'no holds barred' complaint also.

 

I have to say that I find the whole situation very worrying; I do not use TL's myself, but as I plan to holiday overseas soon, I will ask for my room to be visually inspected before I go in there, and as I leave. I will also take dated photos of the room before I leave as back up.

 

This is disgraceful. I think you should be writing to the company Head office, they have caused no end of stress - someone has written what amounts to threatening letters demanding money. At the very least you want some compensation for the stress. And NO.. you dont want money off or free nights stay at Travel Lodge :)

 

I am pleased that this has been resolved.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

My hunch now, is that damage is logged, and occupants are contacted (with threatening letters) if they have stayed within a week or so time period after the damage is noticed.

 

Some will pay, some won't, and sometimes all will pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

My hunch now, is that damage is logged, and occupants are contacted (with threatening letters) if they have stayed within a week or so time period after the damage is noticed.

 

Some will pay, some won't, and sometimes all will pay.

 

 

I am wondering if there is a regulatory body that you can write to regarding this. It is extremely worrying, that's for sure.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice moey making exercise too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Even better go to the media and stick it to them as it does seen to be a money making exercise and to make this situation worse they had the nerve to accuse an innocent person of damage to there property that on offical travelodge record as being carried out by a previous occupant of that room.

 

Now this is me thinking aloud:

 

1. Travelodge accused and Innocent Party for damage done by a previous occupant of that room.

2. Travelodge had on record that this damage was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Due to the Incompetence of the Management of the Travelodge you stayed at you were accused of this damage.

4. Travelodge failed to contact you to discuss this damage and give you an opportunity to defend yourself especially since you were innocent.

5. Without informing you Travelodge immediately passed collections of these money owed for supposed damage to CRS to collect without once again informing you of this or your actual rights if you wish to appeal this as the first you knew of this was on the reciept of the CRS letter.

6. As this damage was already on Offical Travelodge Records as caused by a previous occupant and accusing you of the damage and to pay up this may be seen as possible fraud. (getting two people or in fact how many other people got the same letter to pay for the same damage. Can you be sure this was a one off incident).

 

Now what do I see here:

 

1. False accusation made by Travelodge against you and innocent party.

2. Travelodge Management negligence by accusing an innocent party of damage already held on record by Travelodge that was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Mental stress placed upon an innocent party due to Travelodges Negligence.

 

I certainly would not let Travelodge away with this due to the Negligence as they falsely accused you an innocent party of damage held on Record by Travelodge that a previous occupant had caused.

  • Haha 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Even better go to the media and stick it to them as it does seen to be a money making exercise and to make this situation worse they had the nerve to accuse an innocent person of damage to there property that on offical travelodge record as being carried out by a previous occupant of that room.

 

Now this is me thinking aloud:

 

1. Travelodge accused and Innocent Party for damage done by a previous occupant of that room.

2. Travelodge had on record that this damage was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Due to the Incompetence of the Management of the Travelodge you stayed at you were accused of this damage.

4. Travelodge failed to contact you to discuss this damage and give you an opportunity to defend yourself especially since you were innocent.

5. Without informing you Travelodge immediately passed collections of these money owed for supposed damage to CRS to collect without once again informing you of this or your actual rights if you wish to appeal this as the first you knew of this was on the reciept of the CRS letter.

6. As this damage was already on Offical Travelodge Records as caused by a previous occupant and accusing you of the damage and to pay up this may be seen as possible fraud. (getting two people or in fact how many other people got the same letter to pay for the same damage. Can you be sure this was a one off incident).

 

Now what do I see here:

 

1. False accusation made by Travelodge against you and innocent party.

2. Travelodge Management negligence by accusing an innocent party of damage already held on record by Travelodge that was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Mental stress placed upon an innocent party due to Travelodges Negligence.

 

I certainly would not let Travelodge away with this due to the Negligence as they falsely accused you an innocent party of damage held on Record by Travelodge that a previous occupant had caused.

 

 

 

Many thanks for taking the time to write (and thanks to the other respondents too :-))

 

I am encouraging my daughter to take some form of action about the treatment she received, and will post back with any updates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi

 

Even better go to the media and stick it to them as it does seen to be a money making exercise and to make this situation worse they had the nerve to accuse an innocent person of damage to there property that on offical travelodge record as being carried out by a previous occupant of that room.

 

Now this is me thinking aloud:

 

1. Travelodge accused and Innocent Party for damage done by a previous occupant of that room.

2. Travelodge had on record that this damage was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Due to the Incompetence of the Management of the Travelodge you stayed at you were accused of this damage.

4. Travelodge failed to contact you to discuss this damage and give you an opportunity to defend yourself especially since you were innocent.

5. Without informing you Travelodge immediately passed collections of these money owed for supposed damage to CRS to collect without once again informing you of this or your actual rights if you wish to appeal this as the first you knew of this was on the reciept of the CRS letter.

6. As this damage was already on Offical Travelodge Records as caused by a previous occupant and accusing you of the damage and to pay up this may be seen as possible fraud. (getting two people or in fact how many other people got the same letter to pay for the same damage. Can you be sure this was a one off incident).

 

Now what do I see here:

 

1. False accusation made by Travelodge against you and innocent party.

2. Travelodge Management negligence by accusing an innocent party of damage already held on record by Travelodge that was caused by a previous occupant.

3. Mental stress placed upon an innocent party due to Travelodges Negligence.

 

I certainly would not let Travelodge away with this due to the Negligence as they falsely accused you an innocent party of damage held on Record by Travelodge that a previous occupant had caused.

 

 

 

Hello

 

I just wanted to add a brief update to let any interested parties know that my daughter wrote to Ali Burns (PA to the Chief Executive of TravelLodge) and the matter has been resolved to her satisfaction.

A full investigation is also taking place, so that hopefully, this scenario won't happen to other innocent folks in the future.

 

I want to say a special "Thank you" to you stu007, as your post in particular really helped my daughter put her emotions and feelings into words :-)

 

Many thanks

Tara

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always get her to submit a fresh complaint, stating the room they gave her was terrible, as by their own admission it had £400 worth of damage! :D :D :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tara100

 

I am so glad that it has been resolved to your daughters satisfation although it should never have happened in the first place.

 

It was a pleasure to be able to help.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

"You could always get her to submit a fresh complaint, stating the room they gave her was terrible, as by their own admission it had £400 worth of damage!"

 

A year and a half later and I now demand £bo$$ocks from you for damage to my screen from spitting out my coffee !

 

(well done sir):whoo:

Edited by dadtaxi
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...