Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Prospero v RBoS (Bank Accounts)


Prospero
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After sending the initial letter on 19th September I have received the usual refusal to refund letter from Tommy McLean. Am now sending LBA based on the standard material with this added at the top:

 

"I write in response to your standard letter refusing my request for a refund of bank charges. Given the serious nature of the matter I had hoped you would be able to address my situation personally, but I understand that currently you must be inundated with claims of a similar nature. Surely then the best policy would be to settle the matter promptly, but if you are not prepared to do this I shall be happy to go through the steps of the ritual dance with you.

 

Contrary to your assertion, I have every confidence that you will be refunding all the charges I refer to in my previous letter. You may be interested to know that you have become quite a star in the Consumer Action Group forum on the Internet, where it appears that you and your colleagues have repeatedly settled hundreds of claims in full rather than allow them to reach any court where a precedent might be set. If you are so sure of your position then with all the power of your lawyers we could have reasonably expected to see a test case by now, but for some reason this has not happened. Instead you prefer to engage in delaying tactics while refusing to let the matter be settled once and for all. I can only assume that this is because you have as much contempt for the UK courts and the law governing your business as you do for your customers, who you clearly hope will give up before you are forced to repay them the charges illegally deducted from their accounts. I sincerely hope that when a test case does finally get through the court will take your attitude into account in determining how best your customers should be compensated for their losses.

 

I would like to assure you that I shall not be giving up on my claim against the bank and would be delighted to have the opportunity of facing your lawyers in court, where we would surely have a considerable audience. However, I am duty bound to try and resolve this matter before it reaches court, and I wish to give you every opportunity to do this. To that end I am prepared to give you a further 14 days from the date of this letter to reflect on your position, after which I shall be raising a claim against the bank in my local court."

 

Let's see what he makes of that.

RBS Current Accounts £3868 claimed, settled in full before court

BoS Visa Card £350.58 claimed, settled in full before court action

Capital One Visa £1356.79 claimed, court claim issued, agreed to settle for £1127.46

 

HFC Bank Marbles £408.85 claimed, promised to settle before court, still waiting for cheque

Barclaycard £552.66 claimed, offered £152, AQ filed

Lloyds TSB MoreThan card £312.70 claimed, AQ filed

MBNA Visa £2744.22 claimed, £1250.51 paid, AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

after speaking to mr mclean on the phone today he is really a nice person and you have to remember that he personally hasnt got your money. dont wish to seem rude but a more forceful aproach may not help your claim with him. after speaking to him today he has thanked me for ringing and assured me that every effort will be made by him to resove my claim by the deadline on friday. watch my thread to see the result.he also told me that they have taken on more recrutes as the demand from people claiming has been too much for them to cope with, but now with the additional staff they are dealing with matters more quickly. but good luck with your claim. and hope i havent spoken out of turn...

rbos prem letter sent 25th aug 06

give me 10 more days letter received 2nd sept 06

lba sent 7th sept 06

settled in full 7/10/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all - thanks for the advice. I have no intention of being rude, but I do believe the banks need to get the message that they cannot carry on treating customers the way they have. Their initial approach of trying to fob us off with a standard letter is an insult. I'm sure Mr McLean is only doing his job and probably acting under instructions from above. In that case I hope he will carry back the sentiments behind our letters to those that matter.

RBS Current Accounts £3868 claimed, settled in full before court

BoS Visa Card £350.58 claimed, settled in full before court action

Capital One Visa £1356.79 claimed, court claim issued, agreed to settle for £1127.46

 

HFC Bank Marbles £408.85 claimed, promised to settle before court, still waiting for cheque

Barclaycard £552.66 claimed, offered £152, AQ filed

Lloyds TSB MoreThan card £312.70 claimed, AQ filed

MBNA Visa £2744.22 claimed, £1250.51 paid, AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say, I do tend to agree with Susanne and it might be wise to make sure when you say 'you' in your letter you maybe say 'RBS Group' or something, so then it won't sound so personal to the Man himself! Don't forget we are sending and replying with standard letters as well as them ;) Its just a shame that the 'ritual dance' is such a long one and RBS are using delaying tactics as much as possible - in the end they're only costing themselves more.

 

Best of luck with your claim... lets hope they hang up their dancing shoes soon:)

~

:p I'm a lover, not a fighter... well, most of the time :razz: ~

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, after my LBA things have moved quickly. On 9th October RBoS offered to settle for around 50%, which I promptly rejected, telling them that I would be starting court action today, 18th October. This morning I received a letter from Tommy McLean offering "exceptionally" to settle in full as they prefer to do this directly (i.e keep the matter out of the courts) - I bet they do!

 

Now I shall send them a carefully worded acceptance letter and concentrate my efforts on Barclaycard and the others.

RBS Current Accounts £3868 claimed, settled in full before court

BoS Visa Card £350.58 claimed, settled in full before court action

Capital One Visa £1356.79 claimed, court claim issued, agreed to settle for £1127.46

 

HFC Bank Marbles £408.85 claimed, promised to settle before court, still waiting for cheque

Barclaycard £552.66 claimed, offered £152, AQ filed

Lloyds TSB MoreThan card £312.70 claimed, AQ filed

MBNA Visa £2744.22 claimed, £1250.51 paid, AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!! It does seem as though RBS are settling more often at LBA stage now. That has to be a good thing, although I wouldnt mind getting the interest as well;)

 

Dont spend it all in one bank - sorry - shop!:D

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - checked account this morning and the money has arrived. Now I'll go after them for the RBoS Mastercard charges. . .

RBS Current Accounts £3868 claimed, settled in full before court

BoS Visa Card £350.58 claimed, settled in full before court action

Capital One Visa £1356.79 claimed, court claim issued, agreed to settle for £1127.46

 

HFC Bank Marbles £408.85 claimed, promised to settle before court, still waiting for cheque

Barclaycard £552.66 claimed, offered £152, AQ filed

Lloyds TSB MoreThan card £312.70 claimed, AQ filed

MBNA Visa £2744.22 claimed, £1250.51 paid, AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...