Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MINT CCA - Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Just a quick query. I requested a CCA from MINT. I finally received it after waiting over month (well outside the 12 working days). They have sent me a copy of my last statement and a copy of the credit agreement which was in place when I opened the account. Should they have sent me a copy of my application also, or would this be included in the SAR. Reason I ask is that the credit agreement discusses travel insurance and PPI, however I do not know if I had these. I was also charged stamp duty last month; can anyone advise what this is for? Sorry for all of the questions! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused about this too! U sent a SAR request a couple of weeks ago so I'll see wht it turns up! I entered a payment plan with themso I'm guessing if I had anything it would have been removed. I've less than £100 outstanding so am hoping any charges and/or ppi will close this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I received my "non" sar from mint today. They have returned my cheque and provided a list if charges which gave been applied over the last 6 years. Data missing is 2004-2006 plus all other documentation they have in me! My question is regrading next steps. Do I just claim for the charges 2007 to date or pursue for other data? It's unlikely there are many charfes 2004-2006 ; could I guesstimate these based on average from 2007 to present day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re submit the SAR with the failed SAR letter from the CAG library.

 

Tell them that you are enclosing both letters because they are in clear breach of the DPA by not giving you your data as requested in the original request and that their 40 days is still ticking. If the 40 days are up give them 14 to comply or you will report to the ICO and consider legal action to force compliance.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ims. They have basically supplied the list of charges from April 2006 until today FOC. I am missing 2004-2006, I have a feeling this is because they are going by the 6-year rule. I don't think that I had PPI on this card (have a few random statements and cant see it). Should I return my original cheque back to them also? I was also wondering if it was worthwhile giving them a call. The account should be closed this month (woo hoo!!! :) one debt paid off!), so they may possibly still deal with me whilst its still active. I put the charges I do have into your spreadsheet and used the compounded interest rate of 24.9% (is this correct), in total the spreadsheet says I could be due circa £793! The credit limit on the card was only £500 :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhhh, I have had a look at the letter I sent to MINT and I have made a mjor error :( I have not sent a SAR request at all, I only rewuested charges for late payments etc for the last 6 years :( !!!! I am such an idiot! I have done the same for MBNA, but that was only opened in 2007 so I should be fine!!! Rats, back to the drawing board for me :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hey,

Again looking for advice. I sent off my bank charges request and have not heard anything back. I took my eye off the ball and never followed through with this. Its been a couple of months since I sent the claim for charges; should i just resubmit or send a LBA?

Thanks. If LBA, is there a template for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...